Posted on 06/23/2014 4:56:37 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
I told you so. Elizabeth Warren’s repeated supposed refusals to run for President always were framed in the present tense: I am not running for President.
That, of course, technically was correct. I don’t think anyone of note “is” running for President yet, but many are seriously considering it and likely will run.
Nothing makes Warren’s word games more clear than her interview with (my law school classmate) Ruth Marcus of The Washington Post:
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
Jerry Brown might do it too. He’s old, but he could pull it off.
Warren is pushing socialism and redistribution as a "good thing". Sort of like a nightmare nanny-state version of Martha Stewart with the power of FedGov.
smoke signals say she need heap big wampum.
It takes an Indian to hunt a buffalo.
The same faction that brought out a 2-year senator Obama to challenge Ms Inevitable-2008 probably already has someone to step up to challenge Ms Inevitable-2016, if Hillary does run.
The Clintons score high in personality polls because those pols are usually from LIVs — many of whom still get a thrill from ole BJ. The book tour reveals how little the public really cares for Hillary, however.
Unlike the Pubbies who will flood the primary debates stages with a dozen faux-conservatives and a few real conservatives to dilute the pool for the GOPelite selectee, the Dems will have one major challenger for Hillary.
Those “high cheekbones” are very presidential.
I’ve noticed that all my Dem friends will allow criticism of Hillary now but they will not tolerate criticism of Warren. That tells me that she is the one.
Fake Redskin.
Washington Warrens.
Warren better stay out of any DC parks.....
Oh, please let this crazy b- run.
That would be so great.
I've noticed the same thing. A lot of Dem criticism of Hillary centers around her time as a Walmart director. Many lefties see her as a shill for big-money corporations. And there is truth in that.
But just try bringing up Warren's faults. The bogus (and insulting) Indian claim, her lack of ANY experience, etc. You'll get shouted down fast.
As of now, Hillary is still the favorite, IMHO. She's got the money, and the name recognition. But the grass-roots Dems want Warren.
Bring up Warren’s money and they really come unglued.
Elizabeth Warren was born in 1949. She is 65. Where is the next generation of Democrats? Hopefully, in four or five years they’ll all be too old to run.
Jerry Brown (Governor of California) was born in 1938. He is 76. You’d think if they had younger people they’d start putting them forward. But no, it’s all about power. Personal power. Right on, Lefties!
Now that the demonrats have US stirred things up, her continually using the faux indian persona to game the system is far more offensive than the name Washington "Redskins" is.
As such, she'd be a fine sacrificial communist lamb for the growing grass roots/silent majority/TEA party anger to focus on.
Vaginacrats.
*** and for once having been a Native American.***
Don’t laugh! Bill is an “Honorary” Cherokee. Maybe we will see some Inter-Tribal warfare soon. United Keetoowah Band.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Keetoowah_Band_of_Cherokee_Indians
“Beginning in the 1970s, the UKB made some people honorary associate members, to recognize their services to the nation. Such memberships did not entitle the persons to voting or any other tribal rights, and had nothing to do with claims of Cherokee ancestry.”
” Ward Churchill, a former Professor of Ethnic Studies at the University of Colorado, is an honorary associate member in the UKB.[11] Former President Bill Clinton is a notable associate member.”
Fauxcahontas is the straw candidate. Obama and Hillary do not get along.
Obama behind the scenes will help the Squaw to bleed off votes for Clinton.
Look for another candidate to slip in behind these two for the nomination. Who that will be I have no idea.....
Be careful what you wish for. I never thought anyone with the name Barack Hussein Obama would ever be elected so soon after 9/11.
Consider this: If cultural populist Sarah Palin and economic populist Elizabeth Warren were to run together on a populist platform, they would win 70% of the popular vote and close to 100% of the electoral votes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.