Skip to comments.There is No Such Thing as a “Pro-Choice” Christian
Posted on 06/24/2014 6:32:06 AM PDT by wagglebee
What if I told you that I believe its OK to physically abuse your household pets?
Hold on. Dont jump on my case about it. Im saying its acceptable to torture and torment pets but only pets. And only your own pets. You certainly cant go around drop kicking, headbutting, or piledriving your neighbors dog, but your dog is a different story.
And you can only punch, pistol whip, and karate chop your gerbils, cats, puppies, parrots, etc, up until a certain age. And only in the most humane way possible.
Thats all. Im not some kind of psycho animal hater Ive never even assaulted my own cat, and I dont think I ever will I just happen to think you should have that right, should the need or desire ever arise.
But, beyond this one admittedly unique viewpoint, my overall ideology is pretty mainstream. I mean, I think its important to recycle and eat healthy and be nice to people and all that stuff.
Now, what if I told you that I also consider myself an animal rights activist?
Do you think the other animal rights activists will embrace me as their own? Will they allow the title animal rights activist to be bent and broadened to the extent that it also includes maniacs who think we ought to vociferously defend a persons right to smack their pets around?
Alright, maybe this is a bad example. PETA kills thousands of animals every year, yet they seem to be celebrated in the animal rights community.
Still, you get my point. And in case you dont, Ill spell it out:
Our beliefs are not packaged, sealed, and sold separately. We dont formulate our personal philosophy in a vacuum. Your views on one subject will be colored, or clarified, by your views on everything else.
If you think you live in a world where it is morally acceptable to do X, then your opinion on Y must be understood in the context of a world where X is considered righteous.
So this is why you cant, for instance, advocate for slavery while also being a proponent of civil rights. Either youre lying about your civil rights stance, or else you have an understanding of civil rights which does not include a right to be free from enslavement. If thats the case, then you are not a believer in civil rights at all, no matter how loudly you insist otherwise.
For very similar reasons, you simply cannot be Christian and pro-abortion.
In order to be both, youd have to change Christianity into a religion that does not and would not condemn the murder of human children. Youd have to turn Christ into a Savior who embraces infanticide, and God into a Father who creates children but does not necessarily expect us or command us to refrain from violently destroying them.
What you are left with is something that bears no resemblance to Christianity. In fact, youre left with something that is, in every way, exactly the opposite.
You are the pro-animal abuse animal rights activist, the pro-slavery civil rights proponent, the circular square, the north south. You are attempting to be two diametrically opposed things simultaneously. Youre trying to do something that is not only theologically impossible, but scientifically impossible as well.
If churches in America had any guts, this message would be proclaimed from the pulpit at least once a month. Especially this week, after that revolting story about a Christian abortionist.
This man a mercenary killer of infants insists that his faith calls him to decapitate babies. Dr. Willie Parker says that abortion became this conviction of compassion in a spiritual sense of the deepest level of love that you can have for another person, that you can have compassion for their suffering and you can act to relieve it.
Hes right when he says that Christianity is a religion of love and compassion. But he understands (or claims to understand) love and compassion to include the extermination of 50 million children worldwide each year. His version of love leaves the ground scattered with the corpses of slaughtered babies. Christs love called us all to protect and love children, and warned us that wed be better off with a stone around our neck, drowning in the sea, than defying that commandment.
Willies concept of love, then, isnt just incompatible with Christian love its the precise opposite of it.
But Willie The Child Killing Quack is not alone. Even Planned Parenthood has a clergy advisory board composed of fake clergy, peddling fake Christianity, in order to sell and promote infanticide. Meanwhile, the polls continue to show that a vast number of Christians agree with abortion, to some extent or another.
Now, I almost hesitate to point out the numerous Bible verses that clearly and unequivocally condemn all abortion, at any stage, for any reason. I hesitate because I dont want to reinforce the popular but horribly misconstrued notion that the Bible only teaches against or for a certain act if it somewhere explicitly mentions that act by name.
Scripture must be studied as a whole, in its entirety not in disconnected pieces. From that view, we see a religion which preaches a message that is, in every facet, from every angle, from every vantage point, completely opposed to the killing of innocent children. It doesnt need to say hey, by the way, dont kill innocent children in the womb, in order for its anti-murdering-innocent-children-in-the-womb stance to be clear.
In any case, conveniently enough, the Bible is pretty explicit about abortion.
Shall we count the ways?
Lets begin with the Bibles constant and consistent message condemning the taking of innocent life. Exodus, Deuteronomy, Psalms, Revelation, Matthew all of these books engrave this truth into stone. Psalms, in particular, has a very relevant verse: They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons, and they shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and their daughters desecrating the land with bloodshed.
Question: is abortion the taking of a life? Yes. Call it a fetus, call it an embryo, call it a moose if you like. What you cant call it is inanimate matter. Therefore, it is a life.
Another question: is that life innocent? Yes. And I shudder to think that anyone would suggest otherwise.
The Bible repeatedly condemns the killing of innocents, but abortion kills the innocent.
Who is still confused?
My favorite pro-life verse is that obscure passage that reads: Thou shalt not kill.
Yes, kill must be understood as murder, and murder cant be understood to include justified and righteous killing like self-defense, or the defense of a loved one. It is not hard for me to understand thou shalt not kill (except in matters of self-defense and just warfare). But it is a little difficult to comprehend this version: thou shalt not kill (unless youre killing your young child).
The Bible also teaches that God specifically commanded the human race to be fruitful and multiply. Abortion would seem to fall short of that directive.
Scripture says that life is sacred (I came that they may have life John 10 There shall be no more death Revelation 21 Thanks be to God who gives us victory over death 1 Corinthians 15 He will destroy death forever Isaiah 25) and that children are a gift from God (Psalm 127).
Most compellingly, the Bible repeatedly says that God creates and forms every human being (God created man in His image Genesis Before I formed you in the womb I knew you Jeremiah). Unless you believe in a flawed and clumsy Lord, you must not think that any life can be accidental, or that God wishes for any of the beings made in His image to be exterminated before they even emerge from the womb. God has a plan for all of us, and our job as parents is to guide our children in following and understanding that plan.
Further, Jesus makes it clear that whatever we do or fail to do for the least of His brothers we did or failed to do for Him (Matthew 25). When we abort a child, we are therefore aborting Christ.
I feel sick even typing that sentence, but there is no other way to interpret the matter.
But the most shocking Biblical attacks against abortion cannot be boiled down to one or two sentences. The central point the Ultimate Moment of Christianity is, among other things, a stunning rebuke against abortion. Indeed, if there is one issue today that most offends and desecrates the Christian Message, it is abortion.
Think about it: Jesus was miraculously conceived in the womb. He spent his first nine months on Earth as a fetus. If abortion wasnt a grave sin up until that point (even though it was), it would have become the gravest of sins afterwards. Jesus elevated all of mankind when he became one of us. And He became one of us through every stage, so every stage was elevated and sanctified.
Let me repeat this: if you are a Christian then you believe that CHRIST HIMSELF was a fetus. How can the fetus be anything other than sacred life after such an event?
Just a glob of cells? Is that what a Christian would say of his Savior?
We dont know what Christ looked like exactly, but we know he once looked something like this:
And how did Jesus life end? He sacrificed Himself for the our sake.
Christianity is a religion of sacrifice, while abortion is a sacrament for those who wish to avoid it.
Sacrifice. Love. Life.
Abortion stands opposed to all of these things, and so it stands opposed to God, and so it stands opposed to Christianity.
That doesnt mean that pro-choice people can never be Christian, and it certainly doesnt mean that post-abortive mothers arent welcome. Far from it. Christianity is also a religion of forgiveness, and thank God for that, because I am in constant need of Gods eternal mercy.
Christianity is a faith for all people, but it is not a faith for all notions and ideas. You cannot simultaneously profess the Faith while also defending the murder of the innocent. You are welcome into the church, but your belief in baby-murder is not. You cannot carry the cross and a Planned Parenthood banner at the same time.
You have to drop the one, and pick up the other.
I hope you do. I hope you start today. Now. This moment.
But until then, you cannot follow Christ while you still support the murder of His children.
You cannot be both.
You cannot be Christian and pro-choice.
LifeNews Note: Matt Walsh is a blogger and talk radio host. Hes also a father of twins and a writer of haikus. This article was first published on The Matt Walsh Blog and is reprinted with permission.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
abortion is murder
abortion is legal
that doesn’t mean that it is right
Absolutely agree with the title.
I will allow the person a chance to become knowledgeable about the subject.
Most of our teens are so under-informed that they know little about anything. I’m surprised they know their own names.
Excellent, thanks for posting.
“What is taking place in America,” she said, “is a war against the child. And if we accept that the mother can kill her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another.”
Those “Christian” churches that have embraced abortion have devolved into secular humanist entities that embrace neo pagan decadence. Their “clergy” do not believe in the divinity of Christ.
Simple yet powerful commentary.
I have been saying this for years, one cannot proclaim Jesus and support the murder of the unborn.
So, the fact of the matter is this, supporters of abortion are Satanic plain and simple.
And those who vote for pro-choice pols are not christian’s either.
We need to call pro-choice people what they are, murderers, not low information voters.
“Their clergy do not believe in the divinity of Christ.”
Well, can you blame them? They have got to be desperate to avoid accountability for their actions.
EXCELLENT! The sad thing about abortion is that the person who should be the blood avenger (according to Genesis) for the crime is the mother/father, who are usually both complicit in the act.
This is a great article, and the comments are perfect.
Allow me to add some controversy. There is a general acceptance of artificial contraception in this country. It is found across people of all religions, regardless of whether it is accepted or not by a particular religion.
Artificial contraception is a convenient way to enjoy sex, without having the concern of pregnancy.
As married Christians, is that what we are called to do? Are we called to divorce our reproductive capability from actual fertility?
Since sex has generally been divorced procreation in a broad cultural sense, does this belief make abortion easier to tolerate?
If we are able to reduce marital love and the beauty of life to just a roll in the hay, are we supporting the culture of life or just criticizing those things we find offensive?
Yes. Excellent article.