Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eurofighter: new aerodynamics set for 2014 test flight
Flightglobal.com ^ | 25 June 2014 | DAN THISDELL

Posted on 06/25/2014 9:43:56 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Eurofighter will by year-end make is final proof-of-concept test flight on an aerodynamic modification kit that promises to improve the combat aircraft’s subsonic turn rate by 15%.

Adding leading edge root extensions and extended trailing edge flaps, and reshaping the side-of-cockpit ILS antennae covers as 70° delta strakes should improve the aircraft’s agility for close-quarters combat.

Laurie Hilditch, head of future capabilities at Eurofighter, says the modification kit should give the aircraft the sort of “knife-fight in a phone box” turning capability enjoyed by rivals such as Boeing’s F/A-18E/F or the Lockheed Martin F-16, without sacrificing the transonic and supersonic high-energy agility inherent to its delta wing-canard configuration.

Speaking at Airbus Defence & Space's Manching Eurofighter final assembly and maintenance facility near Munich, Hilditch says the root extensions – or LERX – have already flown and show significant improvement in the subsonic airflow over the wings. And, changing the shape of the ILS antennae cover to resemble a delta strake does the same for the vertical tail fin. The canards, he adds, act as strakes but not throughout their range of movement.

By: DAN THISDELLMUNICH Source: Flightglobal.com 13 hours ago Eurofighter will by year-end make is final proof-of-concept test flight on an aerodynamic modification kit that promises to improve the combat aircraft’s subsonic turn rate by 15%.

Adding leading edge root extensions and extended trailing edge flaps, and reshaping the side-of-cockpit ILS antennae covers as 70° delta strakes should improve the aircraft’s agility for close-quarters combat.

Laurie Hilditch, head of future capabilities at Eurofighter, says the modification kit should give the aircraft the sort of “knife-fight in a phone box” turning capability enjoyed by rivals such as Boeing’s F/A-18E/F or the Lockheed Martin F-16, without sacrificing the transonic and supersonic high-energy agility inherent to its delta wing-canard configuration.

Speaking at Airbus Defence & Space's Manching Eurofighter final assembly and maintenance facility near Munich, Hilditch says the root extensions – or LERX – have already flown and show significant improvement in the subsonic airflow over the wings. And, changing the shape of the ILS antennae cover to resemble a delta strake does the same for the vertical tail fin. The canards, he adds, act as strakes but not throughout their range of movement.

Dan Kemsley/Eurofighter

A further boost to agility could also come from the addition of thrust vectoring, which Hilditch likens to an extra control surface. Eurofighter, he says, has done quite a bit of work on the concept and could move forward with customer interest.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aerospace; eurofighter; lerx

1 posted on 06/25/2014 9:43:57 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Coat of wax will make it go 15mph faster.


2 posted on 06/25/2014 9:53:50 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I remember a line like that out of ba ba black sheep.


3 posted on 06/25/2014 10:31:03 PM PDT by BBell (The Blue Dog is Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Laurie Hilditch, head of future capabilities at Eurofighter, says the modification kit should give the aircraft the sort of “knife-fight in a phone box” turning capability enjoyed by rivals such as Boeing’s F/A-18E/F or the Lockheed Martin F-16,

The Euros have caught up to the 1970's.

4 posted on 06/25/2014 10:34:20 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Been racking my swiss cheese memory for what the drawback to canards is on fighter aircraft. I know the Russians have introduced them in the newest Su-27 descendents, but they are very rare other than the Typhoon.

Seems they have some drawback that counters their advantages, but it escapes me. They look like they could open up a lot of options to control airflow over the wings in extreme angle of attack flight where a stall might occur otherwise.

5 posted on 06/25/2014 11:26:54 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
Been racking my swiss cheese memory for what the drawback to canards is on fighter aircraft. I know the Russians have introduced them in the newest Su-27 descendents, but they are very rare other than the Typhoon. and the Rafale and the JAS-39 Gripen, AND the Chengdu J-10 AND the Chengdu J-20 AND the Shenyang J-15. (to mention just the current ones)

Drawback seen by US designers: NIH.

6 posted on 06/26/2014 12:05:41 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Wikipedia is wrong. who knew?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

“Drawback seen by US designers: NIH.”

BTW, German Air Force checked the MiG29 after unification and they were surprised of the missiles. That did lead to the development of the IRIS-T missile with a lock-on-after-launch capability.

So dog fight is just necessary for the use of the cannon. The IRIS-T can get a firing solution via the radar warner at the back of the Eurofighter and the missile is fired other the “shoulder”.

A sub type of this missile IDAS is used protect submarines against helicopter. The missile starts from a submerged submarine out of the a normal torpedo tube. At first the missile is locked on the active sonar of the helicopter. 4 missiles fit in the place of one torpedo.


7 posted on 06/26/2014 12:28:21 AM PDT by MHalblaub ("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BBell

“I remember a line like that out of ba ba black sheep.”

Wow, blast from the past. I was a kid and loved that show.


8 posted on 06/26/2014 1:13:37 AM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PastorBooks

F4U was one heck of a bird - inverted gullwings, huge prop, ...


9 posted on 06/26/2014 3:09:54 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Yes they’re socialists. Our local library is calling for a computer lab saying, “We want to remain cutting edge.” Didn’t HS in the 80s have computer labs?

Socialists have very low expectations.


10 posted on 06/26/2014 10:30:14 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jamaksin

“F4U was one heck of a bird...”

No kidding! As a kid I would watch “Blacksheep” and fell in love with that elegantly-shaped aircraft. I don’t know how many crayons I expended drawing Corsairs over and over and over.

I wonder how many are still around and flyable.


11 posted on 06/26/2014 11:40:25 AM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PastorBooks

Maybe a couple dozen. But not even close to the number of flyable P-51s


12 posted on 06/26/2014 11:44:07 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

One issue is that the make the aircraft more unstable. Consider what happens when you let loose an arrow with the feathers in the front, not the back.

This is counteracted in modern fighters through computer controlled fly by wire that make massive numbers of control inputs/corrections every second.


13 posted on 06/26/2014 11:47:27 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
I hear you, makes sense.

Still seems like there was some other drawback to maneuvering in combat that canards limited things. Maybe not.

They have been around a long time. While not a fighter, the B-70 bomber had them in the early 60's.

14 posted on 06/26/2014 12:03:33 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
They have been around a long time

1903 actually

15 posted on 06/26/2014 6:33:16 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Wikipedia is wrong. who knew?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PastorBooks
Worldwide there are a few dozen in "static" displays. In the US, and other countries, there are maybe less than a dozen with current airworthiness certifications.

Generally the Air Races held annually at Reno sees one or two, and the OshGosh Fly-In often has one. Very expensive toy to keep flyable - keeping the radials engines operating - big bucks.

The last variants were built by Goodyear (e.g., FGs) and I believe Breswter (IIRC F3As).

16 posted on 06/27/2014 4:53:04 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson