Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge upholds Colorado gun laws, dismisses lawsuit
MSN ^ | June 27, 2014 | Reuters

Posted on 06/27/2014 1:20:23 AM PDT by Innovative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
They keep chipping away at our constitutional rights...
1 posted on 06/27/2014 1:20:24 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative

It is always a toss-up for Federal Judges to rule on what the meaning of “...Shall Not Be Infringed” actually means.


2 posted on 06/27/2014 1:26:39 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

A Dubya appointee !

Krieger, Marcia S. Born 1954 in Denver, CO

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
Nominated by George W. Bush on September 10, 2001, to a seat vacated by Daniel B. Sparr. Confirmed by the Senate on January 25, 2002, and received commission on January 30, 2002. Served as chief judge, 2013-present.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge, District of Colorado, 1994-2002

Education:
Lewis and Clark College, B.A., 1975
University of Colorado Law School, J.D., 1979

Professional Career:
Private practice, Colorado, 1976-1994
Adjunct lecturer, University of Colorado, 1999-2001


3 posted on 06/27/2014 1:31:23 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Simple. Don’t comply.

2A trumps it.


4 posted on 06/27/2014 1:34:11 AM PDT by Crazieman (Are you naive enough to think VOTING will fix this entrenched system?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

“A Dubya appointee !”

I just looked it up myself.

I guess Bush has no way of knowing her real attitudes, as she served on a bankruptcy court before.

“Prior to her appointment in 2002, she served on the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado, and as its Chief Judge from 2000 to 2002.”

http://cle.cobar.org/Home/FacultyAuthorDirectory/Info.aspx?CUSTOMERCD=8595


5 posted on 06/27/2014 1:35:27 AM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Appointed September 10, 2001, no less....


6 posted on 06/27/2014 1:42:22 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Drop her off out East Colfax some hot Saturday night without a cell phone, money, or ID and see how many rounds she’d want in her magazine...


7 posted on 06/27/2014 1:45:23 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

The Bankruptcy Court appointment would’ve been Presidential, so that earlier position would’ve made her a Clintonista in 1994.


8 posted on 06/27/2014 2:15:55 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
-- The Bankruptcy Court appointment would've been Presidential, so that earlier position would've made her a Clintonista in 1994. --

Not a presidential appointment, not even a presidential nomination. Bankruptcy judges are selected by judges already in the federal court system. 28 USC 152 - Appointment of bankruptcy judges.

As a group, judges are one of the most hostile toward the right to keep and bear arms, and judges (as a group) are also blatantly dishonest in rendering their decisions and opinions. But, even though they are as corrupt as the Mafia, they are also as powerful.

9 posted on 06/27/2014 2:40:12 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

"After a two-week civil trial, U.S. District Chief Judge Marcia Krieger ruled the lawsuit lacked standing and said no evidence had been produced which showed limiting magazines to 15 rounds seriously diminished the ability to defend oneself."

Because it is RIGHTS of the Constitution we are discussing here, the intent has been distorted. It should be that "There is no evidence that proves that it is the 16th or greater bullet that poses the threat to innocent life." Therefore this limitation on magazine count is unproven, invalid and moot.

10 posted on 06/27/2014 2:50:06 AM PDT by USCG SimTech (Honored to serve since '71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Really, what difference does it make who appointed her? All judges today are products of a corrupt education system.


11 posted on 06/27/2014 2:56:53 AM PDT by raybbr (Obamacare needs a death panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Federal judges now act as Roman governors, overseeing the local kingdoms. They act as potentates of the emperor reigning in the locals to prevent them from straying to far away from the emperor’s agenda.


12 posted on 06/27/2014 3:18:36 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

There should be no limit on an individual’s right to defend himself from a tyrannical government!


13 posted on 06/27/2014 3:22:49 AM PDT by ImNotLying (The Right To Bear Arms: Making good people helpless won't make bad people harmless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImNotLying

Or against tyrannical judges?


14 posted on 06/27/2014 3:34:38 AM PDT by x1stcav ("The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Let’s play the Marcia Krieger game!

‘Marcia Krieger is a _ _ _ _!’

(Fill in the blanks)


15 posted on 06/27/2014 3:37:39 AM PDT by x1stcav ("The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

... in case you were wondering ...

http://www.magpul.com/move


16 posted on 06/27/2014 3:40:18 AM PDT by KingLudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanks for the clarification on the selection method. You’re quite right about the judiciary, one reason why they need to be made far more accountable for their actions (and that there should be avenues to overturn their blatantly unconstitutional rulings when necessary).


17 posted on 06/27/2014 3:45:49 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Can they appeal?


18 posted on 06/27/2014 3:53:36 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

Looks more and more likely that civil disobedence is going to become very popular.


19 posted on 06/27/2014 4:06:14 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
-- there should be avenues to overturn their blatantly unconstitutional rulings when necessary --

The established system is supposed to do that, but congress if feckless. Massive, peaceful civil disobedience can work. See Ghandi. The vast majority of people keep order without being hemmed in by laws.

20 posted on 06/27/2014 4:23:35 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson