It is always a toss-up for Federal Judges to rule on what the meaning of “...Shall Not Be Infringed” actually means.
posted on 06/27/2014 1:26:39 AM PDT
(I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
"After a two-week civil trial, U.S. District Chief Judge Marcia Krieger ruled the lawsuit lacked standing and said no evidence had been produced which showed limiting magazines to 15 rounds seriously diminished the ability to defend oneself."
Because it is RIGHTS of the Constitution we are discussing here, the intent has been distorted. It should be that "There is no evidence that proves that it is the 16th or greater bullet that poses the threat to innocent life." Therefore this limitation on magazine count is unproven, invalid and moot.
posted on 06/27/2014 2:50:06 AM PDT
by USCG SimTech
(Honored to serve since '71)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson