Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dark Funding Fueling Climate Change Propaganda
www.mainstreet.com/vanity ^ | June 20, 2014 | Laura Kiesel

Posted on 06/28/2014 3:52:44 PM PDT by publius911

NEW YORK (MainStreet) — This spring, new research out of Canada's McGill University that reviewed historical temperature records and geological data (ice cores, tree rings and lake sediments) concluded with 99% certainty that our current climate change predicament cannot be ascribed to natural cycles.

But many are still dubious that man-made climate change is real. What's more, some skeptics even claim climate change is a money-making scam. In reality, you can follow the "dark money" to see how targeted funding is perpetuating these misconceptions -- even as climate change awareness and research groups lose funding.

The article attempts to attack "skeptic" propaganda, while presenting a one sided "expose" of "Dark Funding."
They accidentally forgot to mention that both sides of the issue is driven by Dark Funding, with one crucial huge difference :

The "Deniers" are funded by private foundations and individuals, while the no-science no-information Pro-Climate Warming scamsters are funded mostly by government taxpayer seized money funneled through impressive sounding University research run by undergraduate students and hairdressers, too many of whom are immature ethically challenged wannabe criminals.

The bottom line of the article?
Global warming scamsters good; Global warming deniers bad.

The global warming scam has been exposed to be duplicitous, dishonest and conspiratorial. The evidence of Climate Warming is shaky, beginning with the deliberate confounding of weather for climate, and ending with faked historical records manipulated always to yield the "desired" result.

The most blatant and embarrassing criminal conspiracy was the years-long search for the scamsters to find a convincing way to "get rid of the medieval warm period," by fraud, if necessary. Fortunately, history does not favor the revisionists of widely recorded historical events.

(Excerpt) Read more at mainstreet.com ...


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: climatechange; conspiracytheory; fraud; funding; globalwarmingscare; thebiglie
I had to post this propaganda attack on Climate Skeptics because of its remarkable Chutzpah.

1 posted on 06/28/2014 3:52:44 PM PDT by publius911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: publius911

This article was hysterically and astonishingly misleading.

The watermelons have no contact with reality. Truth, decency and honor are their enemies.

A jaw-dropping excursion into the progressive reality-distortion field.

Just. Wow.


2 posted on 06/28/2014 4:03:53 PM PDT by JT Hatter (Who is Barack Obama? And What is He Really Up To?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911

“new research out of Canada’s McGill University that reviewed historical temperature records and geological data (ice cores, tree rings and lake sediments) concluded with 99% certainty that our current climate change predicament cannot be ascribed to natural cycles.”

A study which has been thoroughly discredited.


3 posted on 06/28/2014 4:10:14 PM PDT by sourcery (Valid rights must be perfectly reciprocal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911

Most of what you posted as “article content” is your own opinion and interpretation of what the article said. The only part of the article you quoted is what is in italics. Though I might not disagree with what you wrote, it would have more impact if you provided your opinion in the “comments” area.


4 posted on 06/28/2014 4:11:23 PM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
I agree with you. It was a procedural error on my part.

Most people, I trust, would be able to recognize the normal separation of the quoted article from other comments through use of italics.

5 posted on 06/28/2014 4:17:23 PM PDT by publius911 ( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: publius911

We really need to stop tap dancing around this and call a spade a spade. Globing Warming/Cooling/Climate Change or whatever is this week is the communist’s Plan A to destroy capitalism. DENY THAT!


6 posted on 06/28/2014 4:39:05 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Feed the wacko enrviromentalists to the starving polar bears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JT Hatter

OK!! Everybody pay attention!

Lesson for today:

1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.

2. The sun is a ball of fire that controls the climates of all its planets.

3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.

4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.

5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.

Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun


7 posted on 06/28/2014 4:58:42 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abclily
"OK!! Everybody pay attention!"

Why pay attention, when you post the exact same thing over, and over, and over, and over...................

Not just on a few threads, not for just a few days, but every global warming thread for months and months, if not years.

I counted over 60 threads you posted the same thing on, and quit counting.

Try finding another subject, one that you might have a little broader opinion on.

8 posted on 06/28/2014 5:40:51 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: abclily

Boggles the mind liberals don’t understand the sun controls Earth’s climate.

Other factors pale in comparison: cosmic waves, CO2, whatever. But CO2 gives liberals a chance to attack industrial capitalism. I wish we could cut off their electrical, gas and fuel supplies and let them replace them themselves.

Liberals are impervious to facts.


9 posted on 06/28/2014 6:05:08 PM PDT by JT Hatter (Who is Barack Obama? And What is He Really Up To?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JT Hatter

LOL, Boggles the mind liberals don’t understand the Earth has been in continuous climate change for 4 billion years. Use resources to adapt to it. Why fight nature, throughout time the species that survive adapts to climate changes.


10 posted on 06/28/2014 6:13:35 PM PDT by jyro (French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JT Hatter

Liberal politicians understand...they just keep feeding the ignorance to the low info voters. And the liberal press is just as guilty as the politicians.


11 posted on 06/28/2014 6:15:16 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost

I will shut up after the global warming hoax stops, thank you very much!


12 posted on 06/28/2014 6:16:43 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: publius911
This spring, new research out of Canada's McGill University that reviewed historical...

Isn't that the place all the CIA torture research was done?

13 posted on 06/28/2014 7:11:13 PM PDT by GOPJ (Losing a battle doesnÂ’t mean losing the war... Freeper livius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911
...concluded with 99% certainty that our current climate change predicament cannot be ascribed to natural cycles.

Okay. Just what the heck is our current climate change predicament ? What are these tools talking about ? No warming in the last 17 years ? No greater then cat 3 strikes on the US main land since the year Katrina hit ? They do not even define what the heck they are talking about.

Its as if they pound some drum and all the progressives say, oh, I know that tune. And they all start pounding along.

14 posted on 06/28/2014 7:35:11 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abclily

Not asking you to shut up, just quit the parrot routine and add something constructive.


15 posted on 06/28/2014 7:54:46 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: publius911; GeronL

So it’s a “out of bounds criminal conspiracy theory” to suggest that the “science” is fraudulent, cooked books, blacklisted scientific peers, personal attacks, profiteering, etc but it is “solid science” to state that the attacks on man made global climate change are an evil conspiracy by capitalists.

Righhhhhhht.


16 posted on 06/28/2014 11:55:42 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost

Can you think of something more constructive than the transformative property reflected in my lesson plan?


17 posted on 06/29/2014 3:42:05 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: abclily
".....my lesson plan?"

Lesson plan?

Are you a teacher? Do you think FReepers are your students?

Even kindergartners do not require hammering something into their heads hundreds of times, especially to the exclusion of other arguments.

Stay in the band, but learn more than one tune.

18 posted on 06/29/2014 1:11:41 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost

“...exclusion of other arguments”...??? My analysis excluded which arguments?


19 posted on 06/29/2014 4:24:09 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson