Skip to comments.Slow bleeding the GOP Establishment
Posted on 06/29/2014 5:10:43 PM PDT by cotton1706
Most of the 2014 primaries are behind us and the GOP establishment is crowing about its victory of conservatives. Lest you think it is unusual for a party establishment to celebrate winning the primary elections in its own party, you have to realize that the GOP establishment has become essentially the same as the Democrats: same goals, just different paymasters.
Pause and consider that for a moment. The GOP Establishment and the Chamber of Commerce has spent $23 million to vanquish conservatives. That is $23 million that they decided was better spent trashing the people who man their phone banks and do GOTV work than in actually winning elections. In fact, the GOP Establishment is treating these primaries like a general election campaign.
Erick pointed out a while back that the GOP Establishment and their paymasters have to win every battle in order to survive. We dont. We only have to survive as an army in being. We will pick off incumbents (Cantor and Bennett) and prevent the elevation of establishment cronies (Dewhurst and Crist) and we will bleed them on a hundred battlefields in a war of attrition. The loss to senile adulterer Thad Cochran will be seen in retrospect as the time when the tide began to turn. The GOP establishment had to spend millions of dollars and they had to illegally recruit Democrat voters in order to haul Cochrans moldering, putrescent near-corpse over the finish line. One has to wonder how many of their donors will pony up money in 2016 for another bloody round of primaries with the presidency in the balance.
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
I hope they enjoy the view.With fewer base voting for them they will win fewer elections. I know they don’t care. But this is not my dad’s or grandpa’s GOP . And I don’t plan on voting for any of their bozos anymore. They left the base, not me leaving them. Adios nimrods of the Nuevo Democrat party known as the Group of Other Progressives( GOP)
Yep, the GOPe thinks the opposition party is their conservative base, not democrats.
The armies separated; and, it is said, Pyrrhus replied to one that gave him joy of his victory, that one other such would utterly undo him/5/. For he had lost a great part of the forces he brought with him, and almost all his particular friends and principal commanders; there were no others there to make recruits, and he found the confederates in Italy backward. On the other hand, as from a fountain continually flowing out of the city, the Roman camp was quickly and plentifully filled up with fresh men, not at all abating in courage for the losses they sustained, but even from their very anger gaining new force and resolution to go on with the war.
Ain't that the truth !!
You got a good one there Lex.
seems like a good tagline
The GOPe’s conservative base are their house negros. We’re permitted to send them money and vote for their hand-picked candidates, but never have a voice in anything - that’s being “uppity”. That’s why it’s necessary to send Troll “handlers” here to FreeRepublic every once in a while to browbeat anyone who dares to talk about not voting for McConnell or Thad or whoever will wind up being their 2016 Presidential candidate.
“senile adulterer Thad Cochran”
Yes! Calling it like it is!
Rush has alluded to the GOP-e wondering what to do about the “conservative problem” for years. They’ve always despised us.
I think it is. The only time the GOP was any good was when Reagan was at the top. They've gone back to what they were from Hoover through Ford.
Yep. I voted for Ford and ain’t proud of it. In fact, I haven’t been proud of a vote I’ve cast since Reagan in 1984.
The scumbags are worse than the scumbags in charge
Club for growth and other conservative organizations apparently have only one goal.
The defeat of GOP incumbents which is the same goal as the democrats.
For some reason the conservatives do not try to beat democrat incumbents.
Why is that ?
It is because, they can’t win against a democrat incumbent.
Except for Johnson over Feingold in 2010, the conservatives have not beaten any democrat incumbents.
I really don’t think the Cochran-McDaniel fight is over yet.
The primary results were just last Tuesday, just 3 business days ago and already the McDaniel is preparing for a challenge having found thousands of votes that were illegally cast.
Then there is the announcement from the McDaniel campaign that he will run if necessary as a write-in candidate. And if there should be a ‘sore loser’ challenge to his write-in which I don’t think can stick by federal voting rights laws, then there is the suggestion his wife will run.
In the meantime I will continue to smile at the media attempting to paint a picture that the election is over.
Let’s see what tomorrow Monday brings.
Maybe they should promise more taxpayer handouts to minorities and call their conservative base racists. It sure worked Thad Cockroach.
Yes they have. You can imagine how they felt about Reagan and those who tried to follow in his footsteps. They've been systematically purging the party for the past 25 years.
Still, not a single senator as uttered a peep against the corrupt tactics in Mississippi. This means.... no one. I am very disappointed.
As for November, there must be punishment meeted, to close open elections. TEXAS, for example. Cornyn gets the treatment, or else Texas primaries will forever corrupted, by the Mississippi template.
..... At this present time ... the Democrats still stand to garner around 40-43% of the votes in the next general election. The Republican establishment vs Conservatives on the other hand are busy trying to destroy every possible angle of leadership from either side.... they are no longer able to sustain a cohesive presence. If there is the rise of a formidable so called 3rd Party .... the GOP tally of 43% of the vote will be split in any way you wish to calculate.
..... Therefore .... the outcome of the next general election should fall as follows ..... Somewhere around 43% of the tally shall go towards the cohesive team of Democrats .... and a split of the remaining votes will be scattered among what is left of the GOP .... the 3rd Party ... and a semblance of others.
.... with the rise of a new crop of Democrat voters and the split amongst all other votes ..... heck .... it appears ... the GOP has a heckuva lotta work to do to solidify at least a 44% of the base to solidify the survival of America as we know it. And that will take a LOT of TEAMWORK
.... Sadly ... at this present time .... TEAMWORK is the GOP's weakest trait.
This right here should win Freeper Award of Year. Excellant summary of GOPe....
You keep spouting this crap.
What democrat incumbents have your Establishment nominees beaten??
Certainly not Nelson of Florida, he’s still in office, or Kaine in Virginia, he’s still in office. Not John Tester, he’s still in office. Not Bob Menendes, he’s still in office. Not Bill Manchin, he’s still in office. Not Debbie Stabenow, she’s still in office.
In fact, other than Boozman defeating Lincoln and Thune defeating Daschle, the Establishment hasn’t defeated any incumbents either.
What say you??
ALL conservatives should resign from the Chamber of Commerence
Both parties have spent the last century rigging the game against the American people, for the self-proclaimed ruling elite. Here is one strategy for restoring the republic. If you can’t develop a better plan, promote this one:
I worked my heart out for Reagan during the 1976 primary season. I wasn't sure who to vote for in the fall--I even considered Lester Maddox of the American Independent Party, especially because he was advocating a national 70 mph speed limit--it was still 55 mph at that time. I made up my mind to vote for Ford on Election Day.
You make a decent point in that IT IS REALLY HARD TO DEFEAT INCUMBENTS.
Which brings us to "WHY THE HELL DOES THE TEAPARTY WANT TO GET RID OF REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS WHEN THE DEMOCRAT INCUMBENTS ARE THE PROBLEM.
By the way, you missed two repubs who defeated democrat incumbents.
In 1984, McConnell ran for the U.S. Senate against two-term Democratic incumbent Walter "Dee" Huddleston. The election race wasn't decided until the last returns came in, and McConnell won by a thin marginonly 5,200 votes out of more than 1.8 million votes cast, just over 0.4%. McConnell was the only Republican Senate challenger to win that year
In 1976 in his first run for public office, he was elected to the United States Senate, defeating Democrat Frank Moss, a three-term incumbent. (Orin Hatch)
For the most part, when teaparty runs for an open seat or against a democrat incumbent, GOPe lines up behind that candidate.
It is only when teaparty goes after a GOPe incumbent do things get testy.
Or is it your belief that when teaparty challenges GOPe incumbents, the GOPe should just give up and hand the nomination to teaparty.
bump for later
Anyone voting for Cochran in the general just condones what the GOPLibs did.
I won’t tell anyone to vote Dem...but there are always Third Party Conservative or write in spots available.
I agree that republican senators should voice outrage but it may be too early.
The best I saw was Ted Cruz commenting that incumbents are seeing the anger of their base because the percentages they are winning by are slim.
I wish Ted would say more but until McDaniel proves his case, it’s best to stay neutral. And if McDaniel should run as a write-in I would expect conservative Senators to endorse him just as before.
The worst I heard in reference to Cochran-McDaniel was from Rand Paul who said he’s for “more voting”. What an a**-hat he has turned out to be. More voting? As in democrats voting in a republican primary to choose the more liberal candidate?
The Gope should let the Republican voters of each state decide who will be the party nominee come November.
GOPe would stay out if the OUT OF STATE CONSERVATIVE GROUPS STAYED OUT.
FROM THE NY TIMES Officials with the National Republican Senatorial Committee said the partys leadership remained committed to Mr. Cochran, and there were discussions on Wednesday about how to help him raise money for the runoff.
Less clear were the intentions of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which spent about $500,000 on Mr. Cochran during the primary. Chamber officials said Wednesday they continued to back the senator, but they were deliberating on whether that meant spending additional money on his behalf.
The Club for Growth, which has already put in $2.5 million on Mr. McDaniels campaign, released a statement promising to vigorously pursue this race to its conclusion.
What worries me is not that they don’t understand what they stand for anymore but that they don’t realize that they are obsolete! The GOP today has no chance of continuing into the future but they don’t know it...
I notice you went all the way back to the 70’s and 80’s. There were also a slew of democrats mowed down in the 1980 election and also 1994, Jim Sasser, etc.
I was addressing your argument that the Tea Party has not defeated any democrat incumbents other than Feingold and my response was that NEITHER HAS THE ESTABLISHMENT, except for John Boozman in AR. We’ve been around since only 2009. You guys have been doing this for literally decades. And what have the results been?
Did Carly Fiorina defeat Boxer? No. Did Pete Hoekstra defeat Stabenow? No. Did Connie Mack defeat Nelson? No. Did George Allen defeat Kaine? No. Did Denny Rehberg defeat Tester? No. Quite the record.
As to this point: WHY THE HELL DOES THE TEAPARTY WANT TO GET RID OF REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS WHEN THE DEMOCRAT INCUMBENTS ARE THE PROBLEM?
Here’s your answer, because incumbent republicans have ALSO been the problem. Arlen Specter voted terribly. Bob Bennett voted terribly. John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Richard Lugar, Orrin Hatch, Lamar Alexander, Thad Cochran, Olympia Snowe, etc. They all vote or voted like crap.
The people have the right and the authority to change their representatives if they feel they are not representing them, and that applies to republicans as well as democrats.
As to your point about whether I think the Establishment should just lay down when a challenge is made...No, these people love power and I fully expect them to fight. And they attend all their fancy fundraisers and build enormous warchests to scare off opponents and if one does arise, they “crush” them.
This is a battle of ideologies. We want to make the American government more conservative. The Establishment just wants more “r’s” So as long as an Arlen Specter type has an “r” next to his name, they’re all for him. We want him removed from power.
Now I know you know all this, but you continue with your phony arguments.
-——Heres your answer——
The answer is to a selfrighteousist, the question resolves to purity. Any taint is reason for not voting for the challenger even thought the opposition approaches 100% purity of evil.
Self esteem trumps what is best for the country. Rationalization to support self esteem got us Obama
LOL! That's part of what really gets me. Establishmentarians think conservatives are supposed to shut up, fall in line and pull the Republican wagon without any say-so in the direction it's going.
That's not a 'partnership', it's servitude.
After doing their best along with the dems to try to destroy the Tea Party, the republican party to me is kaput.
After 40 years, to hell with em
In view of Mr. Cochran’s personal lifestyle and his voting record the GOP should have been actively seeking a candidate more true to the party platform. I am tired and disgusted with the GOP apparatchiks who ignore what is a fine clearly stated platform of ideals and goals when choosing and supporting candidates and incumbents.
If you hire someone for a job and he proceeds to ignore your directions and actually works against your interests it is your right to dismiss him from that job.
In Indiana we had a Senator who won Democrat approval because he voted for their ideas over Republican ones;so we fired him.And then his buddies and he sabotaged the new man’s campaign by non-support of the primary winner in violation of party unity.
As the GOP chose to support a seriously flawed senile seatwarmer over a true conservative I say to them and you:I have had enough of your BS. Go away.
Conservatives in 2014 have focused almost exclusively on beating GOP incumbents with little or no effort in open seats or democrat incumbents.
And then you guys expect GOPe to just hand over the incumbent seats without a fight.
NUTS TO YOU.
NEWSFLASH GENIUS!!! We have to nominate our candidates BEFORE we go after the democrat! That’s the order of things. And the best people to nominate are ACTUAL CONSERVATIVES WHO ACTUALLY GO AFTER DEMOCRATS, not nicey, nicey, go along types who will vote with them should they get elected or HAVE voted with them while in office.
YOU CAN GET NOMINATED IN 25 SENATE CONTESTS WHERE THE DEMOCRAT IS THE INCUMBENT OR THERE IS AN OPEN SEAT.
Golly gee, thanks for telling me that. Why, I didn’t know!
We have been doing that! And we can walk and chew gum at the same time, nominate the best people where there are democrats seats and open seats, while at the same time, working to deny the nomination to those that have voted poorly or have schemed against conservatives.
What we don’t do is just look at the “r” and say “blindly reelect”
That’s how we get worthless men like John Warner and Richard Lugar who have endorsed DEMOCRATS this year, an issue you NEVER address.
“Thats how we get worthless men like John Warner and Richard Lugar who have endorsed DEMOCRATS this year, an issue you NEVER address.”
regarding Lugar, the new conservative senator from Indiana Richard Mourdock is so much better.
Regarding Warner, the teaparty senator from Virginia who replaced Warner is so much better.
Now a question for you. How about all the conservatives who want to destroy the republican party ?
I say if they want to try, It is a free country.
But if GOPe decides it does not want to be destroyed and fights back, well It is still a free country.
Yup, as expected, a non-answer. The republican senators who vote with the democrats, vote like democrats or support democrats are never to be berated. Nothing to see here!
But if conservatives challenge incumbent republicans, we’re accused of “working to prevent a republican majority.” But people like Warner, Lugar, Chafee, Specter, Crist, Murkowski, etc, are completely overlooked (or are given a nice attaboy pat on the back!).
Richard Mourdock was a great candidate. He was felled by snarky reporters, a stupid answer to a question, and a Mike Huckabee endorsed nominee in Missouri.
Do your research! There was no Tea Party in 2008 when Warner ran. His opponent was Jim Gilmore.
And conservatives do not want to “destroy the republican party.” We want to make it more conservative. That means electing conservatives to office and removing moderates or liberals, no matter what party they belong to.
The GOPe and the Dems are both arms of the permanent power structure. The job of the Dems is to implement socialism. The job of the GOPe is to prevent any real opposition to socialism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.