Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Public union can't make nonmembers pay fees
The Associated Press ^ | June 30, 2014

Posted on 06/30/2014 7:13:31 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The Supreme Court says public sector unions can't collect fees from home health care workers who object to being affiliated with a union.

The justices on Monday said collecting the fees violates the First Amendment rights of workers who are not union members....

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: harrisvquinn; publicsectorunions; scotus; supremecourt; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: centurion316

“This represents the death knell to public sector unions...”

I wish you were correct, but the ruling does NOT. The ruling only applies to “home healthcare workers” with even more conditions. This is a very narrow ruling.


41 posted on 06/30/2014 9:46:05 AM PDT by SgtHooper (This is not my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Most SCOTUS rulings are narrow, but they establish a precedent that later applies more broadly. The broader implication here is good for right to work laws, it’s good for those who are trying to roll back the power of public employee unions, and it’s good for freedom and liberty. Small steps are sometimes good things.


42 posted on 06/30/2014 9:56:04 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

I know the Supreme Court is an appellate court. But, often, the appeals are based on something that happened in the case... a faulty argument, or a procedural error, or some questionable evidence. This didn’t make it that far in the lower courts—”thrown out” to me means that it wasn’t considered at all.


43 posted on 06/30/2014 10:42:50 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

I would assume so.


44 posted on 06/30/2014 11:51:41 AM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Yes, it is a chink in the armor, and surely to drive libtards ballistic.


45 posted on 06/30/2014 1:05:21 PM PDT by SgtHooper (This is not my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans

Sure makes you think about voting for senate rinos. One more lib on the SC spells doom.


46 posted on 06/30/2014 3:39:48 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So Awesome!

Not the kill-shot for public employee mafia, but a hell of a knee-capping!!


47 posted on 06/30/2014 5:48:18 PM PDT by CharleysPride (A accipitris volatu supra quinque vexillis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson