Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Companies Can Refuse To Cover Contraception, Supreme Court Says
NPR ^ | June 30, 2014 | Bill Chappell

Posted on 06/30/2014 7:22:28 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: longtermmemmory

I hadn’t considered the gay marriage/cake baker cases. Very good news.


61 posted on 06/30/2014 8:09:46 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

It is up for consideration because it is the most relevant issue we have

It is very destructive and powerful

That the court decided against it is likely indicative of the logic

No one should be forced to participate in or pay for contraception

And it is a huge issue not an insignificant one


62 posted on 06/30/2014 8:10:52 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bboop

They did go for an emergency hearing.If I find out anything I will post it.


63 posted on 06/30/2014 8:17:25 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I chose my words poorly. What I meant is that at what point do we NOT stay a free society. I would say sometime around 1913 when the income tax was ratified.

Regardless, what could be more problematic than a Federal Government that inserts itself in between a person and every aspect of his interaction with others. From their employers, to their churches, to anything else.

Of course it is relevant. However the fact that it is relevant is frightening as Hell from a liberty standpoint!


64 posted on 06/30/2014 8:18:31 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bboop

According to Catholic News Agency, the Hobby Lobby decision, which applies to for-profit businesses, won’t necessarily affect the Irondale nonprofit TV network.
EWTN’s filing came 10 days after a U.S. District Court Judge ruled against the network. Without an injunction, EWTN would be forced to offer contraception to its employees as part of its health care plan beginning July 1.
http://www.bizjournals.com/birmingham/morning_call/2014/06/ewtn-files-emergency-appeal-to-supreme-court-over.html


65 posted on 06/30/2014 8:21:38 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m overjoyed and stunned. This is so critical!


66 posted on 06/30/2014 8:25:57 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bboop

Don’t know, but my understanding is that Hobby Lobby fought for not having to supply/participate in abortion inducing contraception.

The Catholic view (EWTN) is that they don’t want to be involved in any form of artificial contraception.


67 posted on 06/30/2014 8:27:42 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Just checked out DU to see how they were dealing with this. This is typical:

If they are blatant about their religious beliefs, I will not spend money with that business. I'd already trended that way, this just seals it.
Living in the Deep South, many companies do plaster crosses, those stupid fish, or "God Bless America" all over their company ads, vehicles, and locations. If I see any of that, I will turn away and look for another place to spend my money.
I am an atheist - used to be an apathetic agnostic but I am being driven more and more away from not caring about religion to caring very much how it is being FORCED on every aspect of my life. These so-called Christians are pissing me off big time!

This is this is the face of the enemy.

68 posted on 06/30/2014 8:36:40 AM PDT by Crusher138 ("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crusher138

That was delicious.


69 posted on 06/30/2014 8:37:50 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Oral contraception to PREVENT ovulation is a good thing unless one has religious objections. Saying they allow women “... to act as irresponsibly about their sexuality as sailors on shore leave...” is not a religious objection. Sounds more like ‘most women would be sluts if given a chance.’

Yes, there are other ways to prevent fertilization. That’s how I ended up with my third child at 36. Then I went fail safe: had my tubes tied and had a tubal pregnancy at 38.

I used the pill off & on during my fertile years. Wasn’t a slut & paid for it out of pocket.


70 posted on 06/30/2014 8:38:00 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

I was a toddler, but I still miss it.


71 posted on 06/30/2014 8:38:16 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I just hear well tail end of the story props to Hobby Lobby

This drive Obama admsation up the wall Hobby Lobby got over on them this President he seem the type you better pay to attention this dear leader


72 posted on 06/30/2014 8:46:37 AM PDT by SevenofNine (We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What about the baker and his choosing not to bake cakes for certain weddings?


73 posted on 06/30/2014 8:49:19 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crusher138

That sounds slightly saner than my neighbor komrade Larry. He writes some real wacko letters to the state newspaper and local free times.


74 posted on 06/30/2014 8:55:33 AM PDT by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

As well you SHOULD pay for it out of your own pocket!

That is the point.

As for fail safe. A tubal pregnancy caused by tubal ligation is hardly fail safe. What it was was a potential deadly medical condition caused by the tubal ligation.

The safest way to prevent pregnancy is to understand female fertility and abstain from sexual intercourse during the time that a woman is fertile. Beyond that, the use of massive artificial chemical hormones not only can effect women’s health negatively. They leach into our water supply and effect the fertility and life of others in the society.

Believe it. Contraception is the well dressed step child of abortion. It is because of the widely accepted use of contraception and the idea of ‘wanted’ and ‘unwanted children’ that abortion is not only widely available, but morally acceptable to so many people.

” Sounds more like ‘most women would be sluts if given a chance.’”

Based on abortion rates, out of wedlock births and almost unanimous polls on sexual attitudes it seems that if not MOST women, certainly a large percentage of women are little more than sluts NOW!


75 posted on 06/30/2014 8:56:06 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

BTW. The failure rate for oral contraception is between 1-5%.

If 1 - 5 of every plane that was flown crashed, how many people would be flying?

Abortion is the fail safe of contraception. It is utilized by a third of all American women over the course of a lifetime and by over a million women every year.


76 posted on 06/30/2014 9:00:24 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

1-5 of 100 planes.


77 posted on 06/30/2014 9:03:01 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think it’s pretty sad that our side has been beaten back to where THIS is a battle we’re desperately trying to win. The SCOTUS, and CJ Roberts specifically, dealt a terrible blow to our formerly free country.


78 posted on 06/30/2014 9:07:58 AM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Prediction: Obama will make a statement that he will use whatever executive power he can to insure women have access to health care.


79 posted on 06/30/2014 9:09:38 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: impimp
Shareholders of a company should be able to say that they have religious beliefs regardless of whether it is closely held by 5 or fewer people.

That would be the next test, wouldn't it? The fact that the decision was narrow doesn't mean it can't be applied to a larger context, it's just that it's as-yet untested in that context.

80 posted on 06/30/2014 9:37:55 AM PDT by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson