Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NARAL lies about which drugs SCOTUS ruled on in Hobby Lobby case
Live Action News ^ | 6/30/14 | Lauren Enriquez

Posted on 07/01/2014 6:18:52 AM PDT by wagglebee

NARAL added to its tidy collection of lies today when the group released a meme that juxtaposed Viagra and a pack of regular, hormonal birth control pills. Over the picture of Viagra was stamped the word “Covered.” Over the picture of the pack of birth control pills were stamped the words, “Not covered.” Why does this matter? Because it’s a lie that many pro-abortion advocates believe, and are spreading throughout social media with abandon.

So let’s set the record straight: Today’s SCOTUS ruling did NOT ban low-dose hormonal contraceptives (although a strong case can be made for the abortifacient qualities of those). The ruling did NOT ban any normal form of contraception. Today’s ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby simply exempted the company, and others with similar objections, to covering abortion-causing drugs and devices. These are so-called “emergency contraceptives,” and they’re normally used after unprotected sex to prevent a pregnancy from occurring, or expel one that has begun. Specifically, the Hobby Lobby case dealt with four: Ella, Plan B, and two IUDs. (By the way, this and this are what the two drugs in question look like.)

These four drugs and devices — which even the pro-abortion Mother Jones cites — are all capable of causing abortions in addition to acting as normal contraceptives. It’s a mode of action that other contraceptives do not have. This is why the Green family of Hobby Lobby and the Hahn family of Conestoga Wood objected to providing them free of charge to employees. The abortion lobby continues to gain throngs of supporters who are outraged by a misnomer, that the Supreme Court banned contraception. This is so far from the truth as to be laughable.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; hobbbylobby; hobbylobby; moralabsolutes; prolife; scotus
Of course Big Murder lied, they've always known what would happen if the public figured out the truth.
1 posted on 07/01/2014 6:18:52 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus; narses
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 07/01/2014 6:19:12 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 07/01/2014 6:19:49 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Since their father is a murderer from the start, and a liar, should we expect anything else but lies from these devils?


4 posted on 07/01/2014 6:22:28 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

And BTW, don’t expect the lying scum media to state the truth, they just spew the lies they are told to spew.


5 posted on 07/01/2014 6:24:09 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“normal” contraceptives are abortifacient.


6 posted on 07/01/2014 6:25:37 AM PDT by blackpacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blackpacific
Are you making a statement or asking a question?
7 posted on 07/01/2014 6:26:30 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

These lies, and the War on Women ( Rat tm) would have proceeded with or without SCOTUS


8 posted on 07/01/2014 6:29:41 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
They are all about obfuscation, illusion and misinformation. Their silly notions and ideas of “reproductive health” wouldn't stand up otherwise.

Abortifacients covered in the ruling are very distinctly different from contraceptives. One wonders if a woman that would confuse the two should be having sex at all.

9 posted on 07/01/2014 6:29:53 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
This is interesting:

As Christianity and in particular the institution of the Catholic Church increasingly influenced European society, those who dispensed abortifacient herbs found themselves classified as witches and were often persecuted (see witch-hunt).
Source: Wikipedia

I never knew this, but it makes sense.

10 posted on 07/01/2014 6:33:56 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trisham; Brian Kopp DPM

What people sometimes fail to realize is that contraception was universally CONDEMNED by all Christians (Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox) prior to the 1930 Anglican Lambeth Conference and that, after the Conference, all major Protestant denominations condemned the new Anglican position.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2613655/posts


11 posted on 07/01/2014 6:55:32 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Excellent article. I bookmarked it.


12 posted on 07/01/2014 7:04:31 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blackpacific

Some traditional “normal” contraceptive methods are truly contraceptive (i.e., stopping conception as in condoms, diaphragms, spermicides, etc.).

Other hormone delivery based methods like the “pill” or rings, under the skin implants or the like are conception preventives (i.e., hormones that stop fertilization by preventing ovulation) with a small percentage, about 5%, that stops attachment of a fertilized egg if that happens..

This very different from a true abortifacient (aborts a fertilized egg) which is what this ruling covers.


13 posted on 07/01/2014 7:21:02 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
**Today’s ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby simply exempted the company, and others with similar objections, to covering abortion-causing drugs and devices. These are so-called “emergency contraceptives,” and they’re normally used after unprotected sex to prevent a pregnancy from occurring, or expel one that has begun. Specifically, the Hobby Lobby case dealt with four: Ella, Plan B, and two IUDs. (By the way, this and this are what the two drugs in question look like.)**

A good segway into the truth about Hobby Lobby. Although they offer other avenues of contraception to their employees, they would not support the mandated abortion and abortifacients (Morning after pill). It's that simple because they are a closely held (family) business that believes and lives their religion in their business. They even play religious music in their stores. (And not just at Christmas!)

God bless them.

PS. This does not apply to corporations, etc. as the libs would have you believe.


14 posted on 07/01/2014 7:33:17 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It was a statement.


15 posted on 07/01/2014 9:58:37 PM PDT by blackpacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Many are told that the “pill” prevents ovulation. However, it’s primary effect is to make the lining of the uterus hostile to implantation.

“I was hungry, and you gave me not to eat: I was thirsty, and you gave me not to drink. [43] I was a stranger, and you took me not in: naked, and you covered me not: sick and in prison, and you did not visit me. [44] Then they also shall answer him, saying: Lord, when did we see thee hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister to thee? [45] Then he shall answer them, saying: Amen I say to you, as long as you did it not to one of these least, neither did you do it to me.”


16 posted on 07/01/2014 10:10:33 PM PDT by blackpacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson