Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC Seeks Answers From Pro-Cochran Super PAC
Roll Call ^ | 7/1/2014 | Kent Cooper

Posted on 07/01/2014 6:20:03 PM PDT by Viennacon

The federal agency regulating and monitoring money in federal elections is seeking answers from a pro-Cochran Super PAC regarding what appears to be campaign finance violations.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has sent a Request For Additional Information (RFAI) to Mississippi Conservatives, a Super PAC supporting the re-election of Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss. The committee has until August 1st to respond, or the failure to do so “could result in an audit or enforcement action.”

The FEC letter states the committee may have failed to file one or more of the required 24-hour report(s) regarding “last minute” independent expenditures. Specifically, the committee did not file a 24-hour report for a $15,000 payment on May 30th to Scott Howell & Company as an independent expenditures against Chris McDaniel, R-Miss.

The FEC also sought answers for an independent expenditure paid to Winning Edge that was reported on a 24-hour report, but was not correlated with the committee’s Schedule E for the 12-Day pre-runoff report covering 5/15 through 6/4.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: chrismcdaniel; cochran; fraud; mississippi; teaparty; thadcochran; votebuying
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last
The FEC now has some serious question for Haley's fraudulent cesspool of corruption.

Just a bundle update for people interested in this, the most important story of the week.

1) McDaniel camp has verified they have currently 3300 fraudulent votes found, and thats not even HALF of the ballots looked through yet

2) Latest tweet from Charles Johnson who blew this thing wide open

"REPORT from credible source: Cochran is planning to resign if a special election is called.. #mssen"

Ladies & Gentlemen, we may be on the verge of a Dan Rather like implosion. I smell blood in the water!

1 posted on 07/01/2014 6:20:03 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Charles C. Johnson @ChuckCJohnson · 1m

Aftr @clarionledger writes wrong hitpiece against me I get reporter asking to write story. I think I’ll help.


2 posted on 07/01/2014 6:22:56 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

i pray this gop-e m-f bastard goes down in flames. he deserves jail time as much as any average democrat does.


3 posted on 07/01/2014 6:23:20 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

I want a GOPe implosion.


4 posted on 07/01/2014 6:26:01 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

“REPORT from credible source: Cochran is planning to resign if a special election is called.. #mssen”


Problem is, the write-in vote can be corrupted, too.. if the ballots have already been printed for November.

If Cochran resigned today, the ballot still prints his name, and a blank line for write-in below it. None of Cochroach’s ballot checks would be counted but God knows what mayhem would
happen on the write-in line unless Chris McDaniel stickers are printed and mailed to every Mississippian, since a lot of Democrats now are engaged in the Republican campaign.


5 posted on 07/01/2014 6:31:14 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

“I want a GOPe implosion.”
*************************************************************
Thad Cochran is either going down this summer (to be replaced by McDaniel on November’s ballot) or he is going down in November and taking this Republican seat with him.

Oh, how I despise this despicable and evil creature and his GOPe fellow criminals.


6 posted on 07/01/2014 6:33:29 PM PDT by House Atreides (ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN FOR CHILDERS 2014 .... Don't reward bad GOPe behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

As I understood it, if Cochran stood down, McDaniel would be made the nominee. Am I wrong? He hasn’t even filed charges yet


7 posted on 07/01/2014 6:35:05 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon; Hostage

I want to SAY you’re right, but I’ve been straightened up so many times today about stuff we THOUGHT was right, I’m now unqualified to comment.


8 posted on 07/01/2014 6:37:45 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

“Specifically, the committee did not file a 24-hour report for a $15,000 payment on May 30th to Scott Howell & Company as an independent expenditures against Chris McDaniel, R-Miss.”

Where have we heard that magic number before.


9 posted on 07/01/2014 6:38:48 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

I am aware of the clause I think you are getting that from, which says if Cochran died or retired, the write in box would activate and be counted. But I’m not sure it would end up with the Republicans having nobody on the ballot. That would be insane.


10 posted on 07/01/2014 6:39:35 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Your understanding is correct. Mississippi would put McDaniel on the ballot, if Cochran makes himself unavailable for the election. I think the timing on ballot printing is 45 or 60 days before the election.


11 posted on 07/01/2014 6:40:04 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thank you.


12 posted on 07/01/2014 6:43:22 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
From what I read from the Mississippi election law, if they nullify the run-off election and redo it, and Cochran concedes then and there, then McDaniel wins the primary outright.

If Cochran is declared the winner and then declines to run in November for "health" or other non-political reasons, then the Mississippi state GOP names a new nominee to fill the vacancy. That person does not have to be McDaniel.

Timing is everything right now.

-PJ

13 posted on 07/01/2014 6:44:31 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Bump to your post.


14 posted on 07/01/2014 6:45:31 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

“winner and then declines to run in November for “health” or other non-political reasons, then the Mississippi state GOP names a new nominee to fill the vacancy. That person does not have to be McDaniel.”

God, please tell me they aren’t planning to pull this emergency solution out of the bag and make Haley the nominee...


15 posted on 07/01/2014 6:46:36 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Looks like the marx-o-crats win either way. Thud takes the seat down in flames or this is strung out to the last minute with McDaniels not having time to get traction. (yeah, I’m in a bad mood)


16 posted on 07/01/2014 6:49:16 PM PDT by dynachrome (Vertrou in God en die Mauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

I think that was the plan.... but the SOS has to certify the race before McDaniel can protest it with his evidence.


17 posted on 07/01/2014 6:51:16 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Profanity: How small minds try to speak with strength?
18 posted on 07/01/2014 6:52:37 PM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Revel

$15,000 - is that the walking around money that was offered to the Reverend?


19 posted on 07/01/2014 7:10:20 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Hannity just ran a large segment called “Dirty Politics” about the Mississippi Cochran /Barbour campaign.


20 posted on 07/01/2014 7:12:15 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Watched it. Excellent coverage, They should have name dropped Charles rather than just ‘independent journalist’. And the statement from McDaniel they read is now out of date, it is not 2500 fraud ballots they have, its 3300.

Sean Hannity, you da man!


21 posted on 07/01/2014 7:15:32 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

The most important part of this is: what do the voters think? It seems that so far Cochran’s victory has been utterly pyrrhic and self-destructive. If that’s the case, McDaniel’s hand just keeps getting stronger.

This is as much a PR campaign as a legal one. There has to be such a demand that no judge could turn it down, no matter what the bribe from the insiders. This will be the GOPe’s Waterloo.


22 posted on 07/01/2014 7:20:20 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

That’s typical.


23 posted on 07/01/2014 7:22:14 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

I’d say Hannity just put a scimitar through Cochran. I can’t find viewership ratings for Fox in the state of Mississippi, but its got to be high. Thousands just heard that Cochran is a massive fraud.

Karl Rove is probably eating a comfort ham right now


24 posted on 07/01/2014 7:25:32 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Or laying with one.


25 posted on 07/01/2014 7:28:09 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Latest update from Charles Johnson!

“Ok, you asked nicely. Cochran camp offered McDaniel MSGOP chair Joe Nosef’s job!”

Apparenrtly McDaniel said NO


26 posted on 07/01/2014 7:30:57 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

That’s utter desperation. McDaniel will win the Senate seat and tell them who the next head is. Why settle for less?


27 posted on 07/01/2014 7:31:49 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Revel

I got a feeling there are several “$15,000” payments that haven’t been accounted for. I know of one that wasn’t paid and I’m sure we know the reason why.

And there are a lot of $15 payments unaccounted for.

Maybe Fielder misunderstood. He was given $15,000 to go buy 1,000 votes. The work part was supposed to be done out of the kindness of his heart.


28 posted on 07/01/2014 7:32:35 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
-- If Cochran is declared the winner and then declines to run in November for "health" or other non-political reasons, then the Mississippi state GOP names a new nominee to fill the vacancy. That person does not have to be McDaniel. --

The code stipulates that this practice depends on the nominee being unopposed.

AS: 23-15-317. Nomination of nominee when vacancy in nomination occurs between primary election and general election; procedure for withdrawal based upon legitimate nonpolitical reason.

If any person nominated for office in a primary election shall die, be removed after his nomination or withdraw or resign from his candidacy for a legitimate nonpolitical reason as defined in this section, and such vacancy in nomination shall occur between the primary election and the ensuing general election, then the municipal, county or state executive committee with which the original nominee qualified as a candidate in the primary election shall nominate a nominee for such office. Where such a party nominee is unopposed each political party registered with the State Board of Election Commissioners shall have the privilege of nominating a candidate for the office involved.

The code has provisions for choosing a nominee who does not receive a majority of votes in the first primary, including the possibility of withdrawal, for any reason, of one or more candidates.

AS: 23-15-305. Majority vote required for nomination; run-off elections.

The candidate who received the majority number of votes cast for the office which he seeks shall thereby become the nominee of his party for such office and no person shall be declared to be the nominee of his party unless and until he has received a majority of the votes cast for such office, except as hereinafter provided. If no candidate received such majority of the votes cast in the first primary, then the two (2) candidates who receive the highest number of votes cast for such office shall have their names submitted as such candidates to the second primary and the candidate who leads in such second primary shall be nominated for the office.

If the candidate who received the second highest number of votes cast for such office for any reason declines to enter the second primary, then in that event the candidate who received the third highest shall have his name submitted to the second primary, together with the candidate who received the highest number of votes cast for such office.

If the candidate who received the third highest number of votes cast for such office for any reason declines to enter the second primary, then in that event the candidate who received the fourth highest shall have his name submitted to the second primary, together with the candidate who received the highest number of votes cast for such office. ...

ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINIONS

If the candidate with the most votes or the candidate with the second most votes declines to ent er the runoff, the candidate with the next highest votes would be entitled to have his name placed on the r unoff ballot. Chaney, Nov. 7, 2002, A.G. Op. #02-0676.

Now, that descries the consequences against the ballot in the primary runoff, not the general election.

The remarks in the code and associated material that describe the outcome on the general election ballot, if the winner of the primary exits for political reasons, seem to indicate that the party loses its right to obtain the office.

AS: 23-15-307. Nomination as condition of being placed on general election ballot and holding office.

The name of any candidate shall not be placed upon the official ballot in general elections as a party nominee who is not nominated as herein provided, and the election of any party nominee who shall be nominated otherwise than as provided in this chapter shall be void and he shall not be entitled to hold the office to which he may have been elected.

I think the way all that works together is that if Cochran withdraws and McDaniel "opposes" the choice of the party apparatchik, then the party has to conduct another primary election so that somebody gets a majority of votes in the party's primary. If McDaniel is unopposed, but Cochran withdraws for political reasons, I don't know whether or not a primary would be required.

I agree that "timing is everything," but at least two months are available to reach that conclusion. IOW, decide by early September that yet another primary election must be held.

I can picture the Democratic party filing a suit that McDaniel is not entitled to the office, under the combination of no primary election where McDaniel obtained the majority, and Cochran's withdrawal is not for non-political reasons.

29 posted on 07/01/2014 7:47:22 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

“Karl Rove is probably eating a comfort ham right now”

Congratulations Karl. You have just given the Democrats their meme for the next couple of election cycles. The Culture of Corruption. Only they won’t be talking about the totally corrupt Obama administration which the media ignored. No sired. This will consume the national attention.


30 posted on 07/01/2014 8:04:37 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

“Latest update from Charles Johnson!

“Ok, you asked nicely. Cochran camp offered McDaniel MSGOP chair Joe Nosef’s job!”

Apparenrtly McDaniel said NO”

Is this a joke? I would like to nosef rplaced but Chris belongs in the Senate.


31 posted on 07/01/2014 8:14:39 PM PDT by duffee (NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: duffee

If true, this is important because they KNOW the evidence is there waiting to be found


32 posted on 07/01/2014 8:15:58 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
You found what I found. I think, in this case, "unopposed" means unopposed by a candidate from another party. There is a Democrat candidate, so Cochran is not running unopposed.

Therefore, the only saving grace for Republicans in Mississippi right now is for Cochran to concede the primary before the votes are certified. That makes McDaniel the outright winner. Then they can all look the other way regarding Cochran's illegalities.

Any other way makes it a messy affair for Republicans in Mississippi, and nationally.

If this is allowed to fester, Republicans really can blow a sure thing this year, something only the McConnell crew knows how to do with regularity.

-PJ

33 posted on 07/01/2014 8:38:19 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
-- I think, in this case, "unopposed" means unopposed by a candidate from another party. --

That whole section of code pertains to primary elections, and the process by which a party chooses its nominee.

If the GOP tries to annoint a person, and McDaniel opposes that candidate, then the party has to conduct an election to make the choice, and in order to properly be on the general election ballot (eligible for office), the nominee has to either be unopposed (in the primary) or receive a majority of votes in the primary/runoff.

Cochran conceding does not make McDaniel receive a majority of votes in the primary.

34 posted on 07/01/2014 8:53:14 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

“If true, this is important because they KNOW the evidence is there waiting to be found.”
*********************************************************************

And on a related note, there certainly IS a reason they are conducting massive resistance to allowing True-The-Vote access to the absentee ballot material. The GOPe has been getting consulting advice from their DemocRAT partners on how to conduct election fraud. They just aren’t as good yet as the RATS on covering their tracks.

It’s an evil monstrosity we’re facing in the Cochran-Barbour corruption machine.


35 posted on 07/01/2014 8:59:44 PM PDT by House Atreides (ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN FOR CHILDERS 2014 .... Don't reward bad GOPe behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: don-o

oh please.


36 posted on 07/01/2014 9:15:48 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Thank God we caught this budding evil monstrosity in the bud.

Now let’s catch all the other machines.

Make the machines afraid to machine!


37 posted on 07/01/2014 9:29:46 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon; txhurl

In addition to the ballots cast, there are more than 19,000 absentee ballots that came in for the runoff and were significantly higher than for the first primary. The McDaniel camp strongly suspects there is substantial fraud in these absentee ballots and they have not yet begun to review them.

Cochran should resign because if it is proven that he is linked in any way to buying votes with walking around money, then he will be kicked out of Congress and I think that entails losing his pension.


38 posted on 07/01/2014 9:31:51 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

True, that may be why there is this new floated news he will resign if another election is called. He may now be thinking of his pension over Haley’s interests.


39 posted on 07/01/2014 9:35:57 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
That last part is not true. Cochran conceding does make McDaniel the nominee because there are no additional Republican candidates from the primary to contest it. McDaniel was the top vote-getter, and there was no third place. So Cochran can still drop out before the run-off is certified, leaving McDaniel the only man standing.

The first part has to do with a vacancy after the primary is settled. It's not settled yet, so it doesn't apply yet.

-PJ

40 posted on 07/01/2014 9:49:26 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon; txhurl

No one likes a prolonged fight but I think McDaniel should set the example and track the corruption all the way back to DC and the GOPe.

A lot of wars in history were prolonged by a failure to hunt down the enemy when it was in retreat. Often the victors on a battlefield will run off the aggressors and call it a day. That is wrong. Because the enemy escapes and lives to fight another day. Patton knew this well.

Yes, McDaniel becomes the nominee when Cochran steps down. But he should *at a minimum* demand certain concessions from the state GOP and the GOPe in DC:

1. Immediate resignations of MS state GOP leaders including Connie Cochran and Haley Barbour.

2. No more outside funds period directed by or involving a sitting member of Congress supporting an incumbent against a challenger in a primary in any state.

3. McConnell steps down as minority leader and is barred from becoming majority leader.

4. Choice of committee assignments for Senator McDaniel.

Such demands can sue for peace in return for not pursuing criminal charges against members of the GOPe that were involved in the Cochran corruption against McDaniel.


41 posted on 07/01/2014 9:52:30 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Seem like reasonable demands, but Connie Cochran will go down separately if the allegations of McInnis are true. She’s looking at a long prison sentence.


42 posted on 07/01/2014 9:57:23 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

BUMP TO THE TOP

Thank you for your continuing insight, it is invaluable.

Keep it comin’!


43 posted on 07/01/2014 10:05:40 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

No one likes a prolonged fight


We LIVE for prolonged fights to win our Country back!

We’re not just trading recipes here.

Thank you so much... very few of us have the time to dig into States’ election laws, and FEC percussions on them, like you do.


44 posted on 07/01/2014 10:11:48 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Are you exhausted? I am. But in 25 hours, this has gone from a lone ex-Breitbart blogger to National!


45 posted on 07/01/2014 10:16:41 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

From a posting on a knock-up website to Fox News in 25 hours. Pretty damn impressive.

I am sensing a Dan Rather moment coming


46 posted on 07/01/2014 10:18:09 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

But this would be an expose of the whole RAT/RINO vote fraud machine.

The tightest held secret of American Politics ripped apart, for everybody to see the cross-section of across-the-aisle fraud.


47 posted on 07/01/2014 10:22:21 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
-- Cochran conceding does make McDaniel the nominee because there are no additional Republican candidates from the primary to contest it. So Cochran can still drop out before the run-off is certified, leaving McDaniel the only man standing. --

The way the code reads, the timing refers to "between primary and general elections," and I don't know if an election is complete on the day the ballots are cast, or on the day the contest is finally settled, or some other day. Either way, I don't think "certification" represents final settlement. If McDaniel contests the certified outcome, the race remains unsettled until his claim is resolved.

If Cochran wins the primary (gets a final settlement after McDaniel's claims have been resolved), then drops out between the primary and general election (whatever that timing is), then there is no person with a majority of votes in the primary.

I noticed that the code does not directly address a situation where the majority vote getter in the primary (the nominee) drops out for political reasons; and that's partly how I reached the inference that if Cochran drops out for political reasons, another primary has to be held. There is also a note in the code, that if Cochran drops out for other than a non-political reason, the executive committee lacks the power to name the party's nominee. This is under 23-15-317, "vacancy in nomination between primary election and general election" ...

If a nominee withdraws for a legitimate nonpolitical reason as defined in Section 23-15-317 and his sworn affidavit is approved by the State Board of Election Commissioners, the municipal party executive committee would then be required to name a substitute nominee. If a nominee withdraws and no affidavit is submitted and approved, said executive committee would have no authority to name a substitute nominee. In either case, the nominee has the right to withdraw his candidacy pursuant to Section 23-15-363. Baum, May 20, 2005, A.G. Op. 05-0237.
I think all that complexity is there to prevent parties from pulling bait and switch, or intimidating/bribing a nominee (primary winner) to withdraw - and also to encourage candidates to stick to their decision to run in the primary contest.

The way I see it, the voters have fully spoken in the primary. We don't know the results yet, but the election has been held. If Cochran is found to be the winner, and drops out for ANY reason, there is no person with a majority of votes in the primary. If Cochran drops out without a good non-political reason, the party apparatchik can't name a nominee - and no person has a majority. Looks to me that path means another election.

If Cochran is found the winner then drops out with a good non-political reason, and the party apparatchik names Barbour's son as the nominee, McDaniel will contest the selection, and again there has to be an election so one or the other can obtain a majority of votes from the qualified electorate.

48 posted on 07/02/2014 3:06:35 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
I forgot to add, that analysis of needing a primary election if "Cochran 'wins' and drops out" is based on a fairly literal reading of Mississippi election code.

The fact pattern in this primary contest may admit McDaniel to otain the nomination without yet another election (assuming Cochran "wins" the primary, and drops out). If McDaniel is unopposed (i.e., T. Carey has no intention to run - but note that he'd have been on the runoff ballot if Cochran had dropped out before the runoff), conducting an election with one name on the ballot is pointless.

However, I go back to the risk of a DEM suing on the argument that NOBODY got a majority in the GOP primary, therefore the GOP winner in the general is not entitled to the seat.

49 posted on 07/02/2014 3:19:44 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
You dropped the most important part from section 23-15-305:


If no candidate will enter the second primary with the candidate who received the highest number of votes cast, then the candidate who received the highest number of votes cast in the first primary shall be declared the nominee of his party for such office.

First, since the run-off election has occurred, we would need a ruling that the run-off is nullified and a new one scheduled.

Then, if Cochran chooses to drop out rather than force exposure of proven illegalities that might hurt the future viability of others, then it will be as if he declined the run-off altogether. If that is the case, then the section above entitles McDaniel to be the winner.

It doesn't matter that McDaninel was never a majority vote winner.

-PJ

50 posted on 07/02/2014 9:34:46 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson