Skip to comments.
Computers stolen in Benghazi attack are ‘huge deal’; State Dept. double-talk is head-spinning(VIDEO)
Biz Pac Review ^
| July 2 2014
| Richard Berkow
Posted on 07/02/2014 9:18:40 AM PDT by PoloSec
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
07/02/2014 9:18:40 AM PDT
by
PoloSec
To: PoloSec
2
posted on
07/02/2014 9:19:55 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: maggief; hoosiermama; Nachum
3
posted on
07/02/2014 9:22:24 AM PDT
by
crosslink
(Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
To: hal ogen
Catherine Herridge of FoxNews was reporting on this yesterday—she is one sharp cookie, with some obviously well-informed and deep-inside connections!
4
posted on
07/02/2014 9:24:04 AM PDT
by
milagro
(There is no peace in appeasement!)
To: PoloSec
Time to break out and grease up the old parse-o-matic.
5
posted on
07/02/2014 9:25:00 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: PoloSec
These computers may also contain damning information on the conduct of the State Department prior to the attack.
6
posted on
07/02/2014 9:25:54 AM PDT
by
353FMG
To: PoloSec
I’m expected to believe that State does not use Whole Disk Encryption?
7
posted on
07/02/2014 9:26:26 AM PDT
by
DBrow
To: PoloSec
The reason they were offended by the video is that they STOLE the computers, then they hooked them up to the internet at their place and THEN saw the offensive video on U-Tube...
8
posted on
07/02/2014 9:27:02 AM PDT
by
GraceG
(No, My Initials are not A.B.)
To: PoloSec
Benedict Arnold, the Rosenburgs, Alger Hiss, Aldrich Ames, Robert Hansen and all the others have NOTHING on the treason and treachery that has occurred during the Obama administration’s watch.
9
posted on
07/02/2014 9:27:17 AM PDT
by
Rebelbase
To: PoloSec
Does it matter? Ask Hiterly.
10
posted on
07/02/2014 9:27:35 AM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: PoloSec
I’ll bet that’s where Lois Lerner’s emails were stored!
To: PoloSec
That explanation seemed at odds with former Secretary of State Hillary Clintons contention that the Consulates anemic security was because there was no classified processing at the diplomatic compound, there were no Marines posted there.It was not a diplomatic compound or a consulate. It was a secret CIA warehouse being used to ship captured Libyan weapons to Al Qaeda, now re branded as ISIS, in Syria. Of course there wasn't going to be Marines stationed there or much security at all. It was suppose to be SECRET.
12
posted on
07/02/2014 9:30:05 AM PDT
by
Count of Monte Fisto
(The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
To: PoloSec
I said no classified computers had gone missing in Benghazi That doesn't make any sense. There are only three possibilities:
1. There were no computers in Benghazi.
2. There were computers in Benghazi. But they weren't used for classified matters. They were used to play solitaire, bid on eBay, etc.
3. There were computers in Benghazi. And they were used for classified matters.
13
posted on
07/02/2014 9:31:34 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: DBrow
They might, probably do. But I’m sure state made sure the keys were readily available.
To: PoloSec
Maybe they should have taken it seriously at the time and put some bad asses hot on the trail of the attackers. Instead of waiting a year and a half to pick up some Al Qaeda hang about that is.
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!?! /Hillary screech
15
posted on
07/02/2014 9:37:56 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
To: DBrow
Im expected to believe that State does not use Whole Disk Encryption?Let me just say; 0bamaCare websites, IRS e-mail archiving and Hillary is a drunk.
16
posted on
07/02/2014 9:40:48 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
To: PoloSec
"Yes! That is correct, I lie for a living."
To: PoloSec
If there were small classified computers, thats different than handling classified documents or materials. I think from a security perspective, we look at those a little differently. The hell you do. Classified material is classified material, regardless of the medium. If anything, electronic media require more protections than paper records.
18
posted on
07/02/2014 9:45:06 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: PoloSec
If there were small classified computers, thats different than handling classified documents or materials. I think from a security perspective, we look at those a little differently.
This is just complete lunacy. The more classified a piece of information is, the bigger the physical computer it should be stored on?
Gaaaah.
20
posted on
07/02/2014 9:52:00 AM PDT
by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson