Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Too many Catholics on the Supreme Court ?
Red State ^ | 7/2/2014 | Streiff

Posted on 07/03/2014 7:14:48 AM PDT by A'elian' nation

RedState.com quotes a Huffington Post article wondering whether there are too many Catholics on the Supreme Court? At present there are no Protestants on the Supreme Court.

3 are Jewish ( Kagan, Breyer, and Bader ) and the remaining 6 are Catholic. It's been noted that the Supreme Court has never reflected the demographics of the country. The Court was all white until 1967 with the appointment of Thurgood Marshall, and Sandra Day O'Conner became the first female SC justice in 1981. Andrew Jackson appointed the first Catholic SC justice, Roger Taney, in 1836.

The largest Protestant group in the United States are the Baptists, but there have been only 3 Baptist justices. There have only been 5 Methodist justices; Methodists being the 2nd largest Protestant denomination. And there has never been a Pentecostal justice.

Throughout history most of the SC justices have been Episcopalian, Presbyterian, Unitarian, and Jews. I have obtained these stats from Christianity Today which discusses more of the ramifications of religion on the Supreme Court. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/mayweb-only/29-22.0.html?paging=off

The Huffington Post asks the Uncomfortable Question: "Should We Have Six Catholics on the Supreme Court?"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ronald-a-lindsay/supreme-court-catholic-justices_b_5545055.html

Huffington Post brazenly asks whether a Catholic can be a good citizen? And whether a Catholic can be an impartial judge ? I assume that Huffington has no problem with Catholics like Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden.

An aside, a little bit off topic, but relating to the recent "Catholic" decision on the Hobby Lobby case; now that closely held companies have been granted certain freedoms of religion, should I form an LLC (Limited Liability Company) to get those same rights?

The point being, Hobby Lobby does not have to buy abortifacients for its employees. Presumably the government will now find a way to provide them free with my tax dollars. Hobby Lobby has been freed from that burden, but the average tax payer/citizen has not. But what are my rights if I am a self-employed company of 1 with an LLC?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: catholics; religion; scotus; supremecourt

1 posted on 07/03/2014 7:14:48 AM PDT by A'elian' nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

This Protestant doesn’t have a problem with Catholics on the supreme court.


2 posted on 07/03/2014 7:16:59 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

Ah, the new anti-Dreyfusards.


3 posted on 07/03/2014 7:17:54 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I object to socialists, progressives, activists, abortionists, and other malefactors on the SC. I don't really care what religion they practice.

I want constitutionalists on the SC. I don't really care what religion they practice.

4 posted on 07/03/2014 7:20:03 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

I wouldn’t have guessed that Clarence Thomas was Catholic!


5 posted on 07/03/2014 7:22:07 AM PDT by Gunpowder green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

And look how all the Jews voted. And this isn’t the same problem?


6 posted on 07/03/2014 7:22:51 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation
Huffington Post brazenly asks whether a Catholic can be a good citizen? And whether a Catholic can be an impartial judge ?

For leftists it's all about diversity and tolerance ... except when it isn't.

7 posted on 07/03/2014 7:23:01 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

Too many homos on the SC?

Too many Communists in this administration?

If a headcount is going to be taken and people are going to be litus tested, Catholicism is the least of my worries about someone’s worldview.


8 posted on 07/03/2014 7:25:51 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation
assume that Huffington has no problem with Catholics like Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden.

They aren't Catholic.

9 posted on 07/03/2014 7:26:03 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

No, there’s no problem with how the Jewish justices voted, because they voted for the liberal view of this case.

If justices vote the way liberals want them to, then an issue of what religion they are, or any other characteristics about them, will never be mentioned. It’s only when the left is angry about how a vote comes down, that they delve into what would otherwise be bigoted territory such as what religion they are.

Liberals should also read their Constitution, and they would find out there that religious tests for public office are specifically and explicitly not allowed by that Constitution.


10 posted on 07/03/2014 7:27:38 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gunpowder green

Thomas is a Catholic convert (like me). He has written about it.


11 posted on 07/03/2014 7:29:19 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Catholics aren’t the problem. Libtards are the problem, including fake Catholics.


12 posted on 07/03/2014 7:29:29 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

For an idiology that supposedly loves everyone and doesn’t want descrimination, it is funny to watch how closely the Left keeps tabs on quotas.

That is of course until it comes to politics amongst university and education in general professors and teachers.


13 posted on 07/03/2014 7:30:32 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

The left has always made a big deal about religion as not being a condition of holding public office. All of a sudden....Religion is an issue??


14 posted on 07/03/2014 7:32:03 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

Wonder if the Huff’ers would like 6 or 7 Mooselums on the bench?


15 posted on 07/03/2014 7:33:47 AM PDT by Autonomous User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Another problem is people with skeletons in their closets ...

The leftists in the Ruling Class have something on Roberts. He's compromised. I'm not sure how, but I'm convinced of it. It's the only explanation I can think of for his utterly mad 0bamacare decision.

16 posted on 07/03/2014 7:33:56 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

High achievers


17 posted on 07/03/2014 7:36:02 AM PDT by morphing libertarian ( On to impeachment and removal (IRS, Taliban, Fast and furious, VA, Benghazi)!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

Most likely they are Nethinims.


18 posted on 07/03/2014 7:36:17 AM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

the libleft probably think it’s time for a muslim on the USSC

no loyalty issues there ....

look for Obama team to have muslim brotherhood guy already groomed to replace Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg


19 posted on 07/03/2014 7:40:24 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

Ah, so now the LW has a problem with religion (They always have had a problem with religion) but the SC used rule of law and the constitution as a guideline for their decision. Why bring up something that didn’t have an effect on the decision unless you are trying to lie to the American people?


20 posted on 07/03/2014 7:44:04 AM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

Well, this country has always had a problem with Catholics. Some things never change.


21 posted on 07/03/2014 7:48:17 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“This Protestant doesn’t have a problem with Catholics on the supreme court.”

Nor do I. Was just posting an article by the latest progressive temper tantrum. It was the Pope, Polish Catholics, and Ronald Reagan who helped topple the USSR.


22 posted on 07/03/2014 7:48:59 AM PDT by A'elian' nation ("Political Correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

Yeah we know they aren’t Catholics. Just self-professed ones. But I assume they are the kind of “Catholics” the left can abide.

And we know the kind of Catholic they make Time’s Man of the Year.


23 posted on 07/03/2014 7:53:01 AM PDT by A'elian' nation ("Political Correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

Yea, I agree. Let’s do this... We keep the Catholics that are already there but add 3 or 4 Southern Baptists. That would, you know, balance things out.


24 posted on 07/03/2014 8:31:59 AM PDT by Lake Living
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

Hey HuffPo . . why not ask why so many Jewish justices?

Why not ask why so many Jewish justices over time?

Why not ask if Sotemayor, Marshall, O’Connor, Thomas, Kagan and Ginsburg were token appointees and ask why that isn’t racism and sexism?


25 posted on 07/03/2014 8:40:41 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Shame on Sam The Sham . . . Michael ScAM . . .$$$ grab all planned by this "handlers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Thomas is a Catholic convert (like me)...

Actually, Thomas is a "revert." He was raised Catholic and actually considered becoming a priest at one point. He studied at a seminary in Missouri (Immaculate Conception??? not sure of the name), but decided the priesthood wasn't for him. He got mad at the Church in the 60's while attending college and stopped attending. He reconciled with the Church sometime around the time he married his current wife. He writes about all this in his memoir, My Grandfather's Son.

26 posted on 07/03/2014 8:41:07 AM PDT by ishmac (Lady Thatcher: There are no permanent defeats in politics because there are no permanent victories.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

How bout too many Blacks in the white house and hangers on


27 posted on 07/03/2014 8:42:15 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ishmac

You’re right. I misremembered.


28 posted on 07/03/2014 8:49:42 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

He traveled quite a road to get back to the Church. But I guess all of our jouneys across the Tiber are full of twists and turns (I’m a ocnvert myself).


29 posted on 07/03/2014 9:00:51 AM PDT by ishmac (Lady Thatcher: There are no permanent defeats in politics because there are no permanent victories.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bert

That’s an ever better question


30 posted on 07/03/2014 9:16:57 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Shame on Sam The Sham . . . Michael ScAM . . .$$$ grab all planned by this "handlers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Interesting. When did he convert?

Welcome home BTW!


31 posted on 07/03/2014 9:21:57 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

See number #26. He’s a REVERT! I’d forgotten that.


32 posted on 07/03/2014 9:26:35 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Me either


33 posted on 07/03/2014 9:40:44 AM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ishmac; afraidfortherepublic

Thanks and welcome home.


34 posted on 07/03/2014 9:53:36 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

Totalitarians follow the same play-book, now they will institute Nuremberg Laws to eradicate intellectuals, religious, professionals and class criminals from all government positions.

The Democratic Party has taken over the IRS and converted it to their political enforcement wing, much like the fascist Black Shirts, to silence and intimidate political opponents. What they have done are illegal, un-American and impeachable actions. They have destroyed lives, released information illegally, falsely accused people of domestic terrorism, racism and then fined, silenced and shredded their Constitutional rights for the sake of political power. Freedom of Speech has been denied, Freedom of Assembly, Freedom to Petition the Government - all the sacred rights that so many American soldiers have died for, these fundamental rights were sacrificed to secure a political re-election for Barack Obama. Then they lied, covered up, destroyed evidence, stonewalled and continue to do so until this day.

This is the Soviet Union, and the mainstream media is the new Pravda. There can be no justice when the guardians themselves are corrupt. We are not getting the truth save for the power of the Internet and Fox News. They despise Fox News and I can see why since it is the only voice that has brought this grave injustice to the consciousness of Americans. There are still great institutions in this country that are not yet polluted by these totalitarians, who are bent on one party rule. There are still great freedoms in America that no other nation in the world enjoys, yet these thieves deliberately seek to weaken them for the sake of their own political power.

Where does it end; more voter fraud, more tearing down our borders, more non-enforcement of our laws, more weakening our nation, bleeding us white. Obama listened to his priest for 20 years tell him that America is evil, and that after 9/11 God Himself damned America, punished America for its racist crimes. If a man could sit there and listen to that cancer year in and year out, what is the problem with that same man shredding the Constitution, the fraudulent document of an oppressive evil white nation. Obviously there was none.


35 posted on 07/03/2014 11:36:06 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (Light from Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

I was thinking the same thing, and we know how that religion predominantly votes. I’m not anti-Semitic; just stating facts.

All started with the Wilsonian appointment in 1916 of the first Jew to the Supreme Court, Louis Brandeis, who vigorously supported Wilson in 1912. Felix Frankfurter, appointed by Franklin Roosevelt, was likely the most conservative of the Jewish justices that have been on the Supreme Court.

About the only place you can find a conservative Jewish Supreme Court is in Israel.

http://www.jta.org/2012/02/28/news-opinion/israel-middle-east/will-israels-supreme-court-tilt-conservative-after-dorit-beinisch-leaves


36 posted on 07/03/2014 12:03:47 PM PDT by A'elian' nation ("Political Correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bert

OweBowMao owes his patron saint, Jeremiah Wright, and he could appoint him as the first United Church of Christ Supreme Court justice.


37 posted on 07/03/2014 12:07:24 PM PDT by A'elian' nation ("Political Correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

The process of noose tightening is best done slowly so as to prolong the agony as breath becomes more and more labored.


38 posted on 07/03/2014 12:33:35 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson