Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Milbank: Losing the Senate could be just what Obama needs
Hot Air ^ | July 5 2014 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 07/05/2014 12:03:22 PM PDT by PoloSec

It seems to be an axiom among Democrat strategists that if life hands you lemons, you pick those lemons up and throw them at the Republicans as hard as you can. But for the rest of the world, one hopes to make lemonade. One particular pack of lemons the Democrats are dealing with this year is the very real possibility of losing control of the Senate this fall. And if you read no further than the title, you might think that the hope of making lemonade was the attitude taken by the Washington Post’s Dana Milbank, when he wrote, For Obama, loss of the Senate could be freeing.

It’s not a crazy idea at all. Sometimes a president can be forced into finding a path toward getting things done when faced with a unified block of opposition in the legislative branch. Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich seemed to find a way to make things work, at least for a time, and it’s now looked back on as one of the more productive and appreciated eras of federal government accomplishment in modern political history. But as you read further into Milbank’s musings you find that he’s talking about something very different.

Yet there’s a chance that having an all-Republican Congress would help Obama — and even some White House officials have wondered privately whether a unified Republican Congress would be better than the current environment. Republicans, without Harry Reid to blame, would own Congress — a body that inspires a high level of confidence in just 7 percent of Americans, according to a Gallup survey last month finding Congress at a new low and at the bottom of all institutions tested.

There would be no more excuses for Republicans’ failure to put forward their own health-care plan, immigration proposals, specific cuts to popular government programs, and pet causes involving abortion, birth control and gay rights. This would set up real clashes with Obama — who could employ the veto pen he hasn’t used a single time since Republicans gained control of the House in 2010 — and sharp contrasts that would put him on the winning side of public opinion.

It is not hard to imagine a Republican takeover of the Senate causing conservatives in both chambers to overreach. House Republicans would get more pressure from their base to take a swing at impeachment, because the odds of convicting Obama in the Senate would be better (if still prohibitive).

Vetoes? Impeachment? Pinning the “blame” for a dysfunctional Congress exclusively on the GOP rather than sharing it? These are the net positives for Obama in the event of a Republican controlled Senate? Wait a minute here… I thought that obstructionism and gridlock were bad things and the reason that the GOP needs to be taken to the woodshed?

In these few paragraphs we get an unapologetic peek behind the mask and see exactly what the real goals are in the DC elite thinking circles. Actually getting something done isn’t in anyone’s best interest. (One need look no further than the immigration debate – which Democrats have no interest in resolving – to see that.) Milbank speaks aloud what so many leaders in the Democrat Party try not to reveal. The true objective is always winning the next election, not doing something for the nation today. If Obama can be propped up on camera wielding his veto pen, that’s a win, even if it means there’s still nothing getting done. He’s fighting the Republicans and that’s all that counts. Milbank doesn’t want the President impeached, but he most certainly does want the GOP to try it in case it makes voters think more kindly of Obama. And if the pathetic polling numbers of the legislative branch remain in the toilet for two more years, all the better – as long as the GOP shoulders the blame.

When life hands you lemons, inject some poison into them and feed them to your enemies.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/05/2014 12:03:22 PM PDT by PoloSec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Trying to soften the blow that they will experience in November.


2 posted on 07/05/2014 12:05:23 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

I read nothing the Washington Post says, including anything written by the Dem Party sycophants like Milbank who write their political “analysis”.


3 posted on 07/05/2014 12:05:53 PM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

I am convinced. Let’s hope that the Dems and Harry Reid retain control of the Senate. It is better for us in the long run. And maybe there will be some SCOTUS vacancies to fill during these next two years.


4 posted on 07/05/2014 12:07:37 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

The Dems and and media will strive to make everything the fault of the Republican Congress, every day leading up to the 2016 elections.


5 posted on 07/05/2014 12:07:58 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

The GOP has done everything they can to secure a Rat victory in November. I think the GOP will lose seats.


6 posted on 07/05/2014 12:08:26 PM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

And in other news — there are significant advantages to contracting Alzheimer’s Disease.


7 posted on 07/05/2014 12:09:19 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Harvey Dent, can we trust him?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBsdV--kLoQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

It would sure be refreshing to see some real action by Republicans for the restoration of our destroyed freedoms than a bunch of pundits sitting around coming up with reasons and fears about why the Repubs should do nothing.

At this juncture, positive, productive action for America is far more important that wimp politics.


8 posted on 07/05/2014 12:09:24 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic

Dana Millbank was the creep who defended poor little doe-eyed Muslimah Saba Ahmed when she crashed that Republican strategy session & wound up getting owned by Brigitte Gabriel.

Oh, those nasty Islamophobes, he railed.


9 posted on 07/05/2014 12:11:27 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

The ONE GOOD THING about the Republicans controlling the Senate is that they could stop Obama’s packing of the courts, particularly the Supreme Court should an opening happen.

Other than that...they’d just make fools of themselves, yet again.


10 posted on 07/05/2014 12:15:06 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Milbank speaks aloud what so many leaders in the Democrat Party both parties try not to reveal. The true objective is always winning the next election, not doing something for the nation today.
Fixed.
11 posted on 07/05/2014 12:17:06 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

So according to Milbunk, if the RATs lose the Senate it’ll be good for Mullah Baraq. So, I guess if the RATs keep the Senate, Milbunk will says that’s bad for Mullah Baraq, hmm?


12 posted on 07/05/2014 12:20:38 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Can Juan Williams possibly be that stupid?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

“Losing control” to their pals like McConnell, Graham, Snowe and others... What a joke. Nothing much would change.


13 posted on 07/05/2014 12:24:42 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

The chance that the GOPE Senate would vote down a SCOTUS nominee is close to zil.


14 posted on 07/05/2014 12:25:26 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Same old blah, blah blah. Does this guy want this country to go? I am really sick of these people who only write about doom and gloom instead of offering real solutions to problems.


15 posted on 07/05/2014 12:27:18 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Obama “It’s just a flesh wound”


16 posted on 07/05/2014 12:31:54 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Milbank is a kook.

If (big if) the GOP does the smart thing and start passing bills that retards the reach of Obama’s bureaucracy, THEY will be on the side of public opinion.

The GOP also needs to be certain to have appealing spokespersons who are NOT all white men. Get Tim Scott, Erika Harold, Allen West, Mia Love, Bobby Jindal, Nikki Haley, other DECENT CONSERVATIVES who will give a positive public persona to this “changing demography” we keep hearing is going to put Demon Rats in control of government for a generation.


17 posted on 07/05/2014 12:34:10 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
There would be no more excuses for Republicans’ failure to put forward their own health-care plan, immigration proposals, specific cuts to popular government programs, and pet causes involving abortion, birth control and gay rights.

No need to 'make work'. Need only repeal the dung heap the democrats have piled up and defund Holder's justice department. Senate Majority Leader Ted Cruz, Mike Lee or Jeff Sessions can use their pen and phone too, and the House can support the Assembly of States by facilitating the drafting of Amendments that will hand the democrats a spear from which they can impale themselves through their buttholes.

The rest of efforts and energies can be used to publicize the graft and corruption of K Street and the corporations and banks that 'pay to play', then supporting the grassroots in leading a boycott of the a-holes of oligarchy; and additionally cleaning internally to demote the ruling class puppets on both sides of the aisle.

This would set up real clashes with Obama — who could employ the veto pen he hasn’t used a single time since Republicans gained control of the House in 2010 — and sharp contrasts that would put him on the winning side of public opinion.

Except there won't be any clash because nothing will be sent to the White House except a truck full of elephant droppings. There will just be defunding, defunding and more defunding with Congress setting up separate accounts for national defense and security thereby deleting the Presidency, why not? Is it not what the White House has done to the Congress? And if the military is ordered to stand down, then Congress can appoint special 'csars' as receivers of congressional military authority to maintain vigilance against all enemies; all by methods first practiced by the current White House.

No need to impeach, just neuter the presidency and ignore it with the same attitude of indifference as has been done to Congress. Act like the White House is not there until Ted gets sworn in January 2017.

18 posted on 07/05/2014 12:34:30 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Snowe has been replaced by another “independent”, but people in ME may think she is still the senator.


19 posted on 07/05/2014 12:38:22 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Dana is a typical RAT media hack without a shred of honesty in his whole being. He fits in well at MSNBC.


20 posted on 07/05/2014 12:43:33 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

What you are seeing here, on the part of Dana Milbank, is a little doublethink. Either way, whether Harry Reid stays in power or is bulldozed out of the majority, it will be “good” for the Current Occupant. Mostly, it is an attempt to psyche out the Republicans, “Heads I win, Tails you lose” sort of thing.

The Liberal Establishment is still convinced the ratchet only works one way - that when the progressive movement makes a gain, it cannot ever be reversed. Therefore, even when an apparent reverse DOES happen, they still “win”.

Time for us to bust the dog on that ratchet. It will then spin backwards, with nary a chance the action will function again until the weights hit the ground. (If you ever worked with an old-fashioned cuckoo clock, you know what I’m talking about.)


21 posted on 07/05/2014 12:44:43 PM PDT by alloysteel (Selective and willful ignorance spells doom, to both victim and perpetrator - mostly the perp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

I guess the Republicans will frustrate Obama again, because they’ve pretty much deliberately scuttled any chance of winning the Senate, like they did in 2010.


22 posted on 07/05/2014 12:48:08 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

I’m pretty sure Cochran is gone in Mississippi, and things don’t look good for McConnell in Kentucky; so there’s a likely loss of two right out of the gate.

Add in declaring war on the base and letting Obama run roughshod over the Constitution and the rule of law—I’m wondering what the GOP has given conservatives to vote for in November.


23 posted on 07/05/2014 12:53:09 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
I didn't read the whole posting but I don't care what Obama needs. He's a reckless
puppet for the Communists who have infiltrated our Government and what
he needs is a resignation. America needs Change and not his Change, America
needs a cleansing of job killing regulations and taxes for starters.

America needs a defunding of the Federal Gov IRS, EPA, and DHS in that order.
To begin the process of taking back public power and control we can begin
with a 20% cut across the board.

24 posted on 07/05/2014 12:58:31 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Losing the Senate just dumps Reid as speaker. But we will really need to get 2/3 of the Senate to put King Obama out to pasture.
25 posted on 07/05/2014 1:00:06 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Either whistling past the graveyard or too lazy to check his facts. The Democrats owned the House and the Senate from 2006 onwards. Congressional ratings were pretty abysmal. In 2008, Obama crushed McCain, and Democrats got an even bigger majority in both the House and the Senate.


26 posted on 07/05/2014 1:13:54 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

I see no difference between Reid and McConnell.


27 posted on 07/05/2014 1:15:28 PM PDT by Hoodat (Proverbs 29:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

The purpose of a politician is to get reelected.


28 posted on 07/05/2014 1:52:04 PM PDT by AceMineral (Some people are slaves of their own stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

It depends on the nominee. What if it is Eric Holder?


29 posted on 07/05/2014 2:00:45 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

‘Rats = Detroit. The GOPe is worthless.


30 posted on 07/05/2014 2:04:09 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

What about the illegal-alien-turned-Democrat-voter influx between now and November? I’m a bit worried about that..


31 posted on 07/05/2014 2:17:08 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Okay, that one might go down to the wire


32 posted on 07/05/2014 2:18:59 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AceMineral
The purpose of a politician is to get reelected.

A strong argument for term limits.

33 posted on 07/05/2014 2:25:20 PM PDT by thedrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

You can hide your own Easter eggs.


34 posted on 07/05/2014 6:05:25 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
Trying to soften the blow that they will experience in November.

It may be much worse (for the country) than that.Knowing that he'll never be removed from office through impeachment,Osama Obama may very well use loss of the Senate as a reason to just do *anything* and *everything* he wants by Executive Order and/or by instructing his Attorney Corporal to look the other way when confronted with certain types of lawlessness.Add to that his refusal to obey subpoenas he might get from Congress (by claiming "Executive Privilege") and you see him moving closer to his Inner Mao.

35 posted on 07/05/2014 6:29:28 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Death can be fun.


36 posted on 07/05/2014 9:22:35 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears
I’m pretty sure Cochran is gone in Mississippi, and things don’t look good for McConnell in Kentucky; so there’s a likely loss of two right out of the gate.

Add Michelle Nunn in Georgia and the Democrats might actually pick up three seats.

Honestly, I don't see the GOP taking the Senate this time around but sending Cochran and McConnell packing will be a small price to pay.

37 posted on 07/06/2014 9:12:04 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson