[Vaquero]

2 men or 2 women can live with and sodomize each other till the cows come home (cow-man relationships being the next thing the courts will legislate as marriage)

But marriage is between a man and woman and for the purpose of procreation and no perverted judge can convince me differently.

[MarkL]

The "legal" definition of marriage has been destroyed, and given the "fact" that the courts are finding that marriage is NOT only between a man and a woman, then there is no logical reason to limit it to only two people.

On the other hand, unless an animal rights whacko is on the court, human/animal marriages probably aren't in our future, as there's no way for an animal to give informed consent or agree to the contractual portions of the "marriage.

However, I do disagree with your point on procreation. I believe a man and a woman should be allowed to marry, even if they're NOT able to procreate, either due to biological reasons or age.

But for societal good, then yes, I do agree with you that for the good of society, and humanity in general, that a two parent (M&F) family is the preferential way to go.

Mark

[Theodore R.]

It’s not just perverted judges, many put there by the American people, but the American people themselves.