Any way
Posted on 07/07/2014 5:53:50 AM PDT by kindred
It was headlining AOL on Friday: a story about a woman stabbing a schoolteacher to death in front of a class of five and six-year-olds. The gruesome and bloody crime occurred in the southern French town of Albi; the victim was a 34-year-old mother of two. But a certain bit of information is conspicuously missing from virtually all the reportage. We’re told the killer was under the impression that the teacher had accused her five-year-old daughter of theft. We’re told she had a history of child abuse and “severe psychiatric problems.” We’re told she’s 47. And we’re told she’s a she. But her name is nowhere to be found, and information about her background is...well, you’ll see. This isn’t true of the victim. Every news source I checked provided her name. The International Business Times (IBD) even led with it in the title: “Deranged Mother Kills Teacher Fabienne Terral-Calmès in Front of Class.” The killer, however, is almost universally identified as “the mother.” But I was sure I knew what
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The lying media loves the Islamic terrorists and their unholy democrat and leftist friends worldwide and are part of the conspiracy to silence all who would tell the snake bit American citizens all the truth of todays battle between Americans and the communist left.
[The point here is that when the media steadfastly suppress the facts about crime – skewing people’s grasp of reality with respect to it – there’s a problem. And when the media consistently exercise a double standard, twisting truth to demonize whites or Christians while calling those who speak the truth demons, we have to ask: where does the prejudice really lie?]
She can’t be Muslim, they’re the “Religion of Peace.”
Teh LSM just can’t bring themselves to say that it was a Muslim who murdered the teacher.
This has been going on for some time.
I remember when the fanatic murderers holding the US Embassy in Iran were ‘students’. After 400 days, they were students. One got the impression that murdering innocent Americans and creating international incidents was something they did between classes.
Thirty years later, the problem is clearly systemic.
“She can’t be Muslim, they’re the “Religion of Peace.””
______________________________________________________
Well, certainly, the teacher is now resting in “Peace.”
Obviously they don’t have “knife free zones” in France otherwise this could have all been prevented.
As soon as I read it I knew the perp was Muslim because there was no identification info on her at all, just the victim.
Islam. Bringing RIP to people everywhere.
Ping.
There is a way to point out the drawback of lying in such a way as to get under the skin of the media liars; and which makes a point by doing so. Let me use England to illustrate the point.
That’s England, the country, not “Britain”, not “the UK”, but the nation of England, mostly (still) populated with ethnically English people.
The media in England cannot bear that almost half of their criminal class is from Pakistan. Pakistanis are by far the most obnoxious people in England, even far more than most other Muslims, at least per capita. Pakistanis fill England’s prisons, which are perpetually at maximum capacity because they refuse to build any more for some stupid reason.
Pakistani Muslims commit truly abominable crimes, that the English media universally cover up for them. And how they go about this is with the lowest form of racism.
They call them “Asians”. Not Pakistanis. They intentionally mingle their offensiveness with that of hundreds of other completely different, and generally well behaved peoples. Indians do not do what Pakistanis do. Nor do Chinese, Russians, Japanese, Koreans, etc., etc.
It is *all* Pakistani, *all* the time. If they call a criminal an “Asian”, they mean Pakistani, and everybody knows it. So more recently the English media have taken to ignoring race altogether.
And after this long introduction, let my point out why this is an awful idea.
By concealing this truth, the English media are persuading the English public that *not* *half* of crime, terrorism, and grotesque abuses of humanity are committed by Pakistanis, but that *all* of it is.
“1.9m incidents of violent crime were recorded in 2012-13 by the Crime Survey for England and Wales.”
While the truth is that somewhat less than half was committed by Pakistanis, what is left for the English public to assume is that almost *all* of it was committed by Pakistanis.
If you are English, do you live near any Pakistani criminals? Or is the expression “Pakistani criminals” redundant?
While this sounds bizarre on the surface, it is quite accurate, because not too long ago, the English people saw the expression “Irish criminals” as being redundant.
It took and awful lot of good behavior and shared culture on the part of the Irish to overcome this bigotry, and there are far too few Pakistanis who stand up for good behavior; and their culture, what there is of it, is far too alien and primitive for the English to want anything to do with it.
I fairness, the identity of the mother involved is usually withheld to protect the identity of the child. This is often the case here when a parent is accused of sexually abusing their own kids.
Here it is.
Moroccan Immigrant Mother Stabs Teacher to Death in Front of 5 & 6 Year-Olds in France
Must have been some sort of workstudy program. Terrorism in the Modern Age 301 & 302. Extensive lab work required. See Dr. Igotcher Jihad Riyteer.
Any way
Wasn't Mahmoud Ahmadinejad one of the "students?"
LOL
Aside from Islamic circumcisions of the males (Yes, the Mudslime procedure produces a different appearance than the Jewish one)and the genital mutilation of the females, there should be little ethnic difference between most Indians and Pakistanis. Yet there is apparently a major difference in culture and conduct between the two peoples.
Islam has to be the answer. Indeed, it may well be responsible for a genetic difference in that it allows and encourages first cousin marriages, something neither allowed nor encouraged by other religions and cultures. Such generations long inbreeding produces clear, noticeable physical effects and genetic defects. The brain being nothing more than another organ, it stands to reason that repeated inbreeding has produced similar adverse mental effects in large Mudslime populations that are just not physically observable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.