Posted on 07/07/2014 10:24:14 AM PDT by PoloSec
This crap is going to be insufferable over the next few years.
A whole new genre of political writing has started — the Hillary Clinton fantasy porn genre.
In the latest, brought to us by Jacob Heilbrunn, the neoconservatives are going to come out for Hillary Clinton. Seriously.
Much of it is predicated on a Rand Paul nomination for the GOP, which is not exactly likely given the GOP’s pattern of nominations. But even so, the odds of such a shift would be small.
Remember Benghazi?
Remember blaming the video tape?
Remember assisting Al Qaeda in Libya and bungling our way through Iraq and our dealings with Iran and Syria? Most of that happened or started while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. And the neocons remember and dislike that record.
In fact, Hillary Clinton has nothing to show for herself except scandal and an unread memoir. Though Jacob Heilbrunn can name one neocon in her orbit, it does not make a pattern. It is also a certainty that Clinton would not run embracing George W. Bush’s foreign policy, but condemning it. Otherwise she’d have a challenge from the left, where she is already distrusted.
Hillary Clinton openly or privately seeking neocon support would fracture her coalition. This is just more fantasy porn by Clinton supporters.
Fugetaboudit. I'm a freedom fighter and a free-market-economy fighter. I'll be one until the day I die.
When Hillary was in the White House there actually were lesbos claiming that they were having sexual dreams about her.
Why would they attack one of their own? People need to start reading statements by Hillary, her husband, Al Gore and most other Democrats from the 90’s and up to the invasion of Iraq.
Hillary, porn and fantasy are three words that don’t belong in the same sentence.
You got that right, LOL!
A ‘neo-con’ is a liberal that’s been mugged.................
I don't know. I know conservatives are against a whole bunch of things. But if a "conservative" isn't for freedom, I don't know what the heck he's for. And if, as the term "conservative" implies, he's for "preserving" the status quo, count me out.
I want change - not the destructive, flame-out Obama-type change, but uplifting change to freedom from government and light to the eyes of the American People.
In Australia, and possibly New Zealand as well, the terms ‘liberal’ and conservative’ are exact opposite of what they are here. So they are merely name tags to identify your position on the local level.............
The liberals don’t like the term, so they use ‘progressives’ instead. I don’t have a problem with ‘conservative’, you can call me that all day...................except in Australia.................
Lord help us, I do believe... 
we may be finally putting some ice on that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.