Skip to comments.
Boeing fears regulatory wave amid battle over fish, water pollution
Fox News ^
| July 7, 2014
| Dan Springer
Posted on 07/07/2014 3:48:39 PM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
The enviro-nazis will stop at nothing to bankrupt the nation.
1
posted on
07/07/2014 3:48:39 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
At first glance, I thought this was going to be about pollution from fuselages dumped into the river by the derailed freight train. My bad.
As if union agitation in WA isn’t enough. Hell, here’s another reason to move production to SC.
To: jazusamo
Boeing already has production facilities in South Carolina that they could use.
3
posted on
07/07/2014 3:53:40 PM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
To: jazusamo
Any EPA decision to jack up the fish consumption ratesWhat business does the EPA have deciding fish consumption rates? What business does any agency of the Federal government have deciding fish consumption rates?
4
posted on
07/07/2014 3:54:19 PM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Yep, the movement of Boeing to SC in total may well be on the mind of Gov. Inslee.
5
posted on
07/07/2014 3:55:22 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
To: RightGeek
They shouldn’t, but the enviro-nazis are in tight with the EPA.
6
posted on
07/07/2014 3:58:28 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
7
posted on
07/07/2014 4:07:31 PM PDT
by
Haiku Guy
(Health Care Haiku: If You Have a Right / To the Labor I Provide / I Must Be Your Slave)
To: jazusamo
Any EPA decision to jack up the fish consumption rates, and in turn pollution standards, could force the aerospace company to pay tens of millions of dollars more to treat storm water runoff.Any regulatory action with this much impact, should be done by congress, not any regulatory agency that is not answerable to the electorate. The EPA is the leader of the defacto 4th branch of gov't.
8
posted on
07/07/2014 4:08:59 PM PDT
by
umgud
(I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
To: jazusamo
The unions won’t like that. Boeing’s a huge employer they want to squeeze max milk out of.
Grudge match: Unions vs. greens?
To: jazusamo
There could be an opportunity here - set the union enforcers against the enviros and hope they friendly fire each other.
10
posted on
07/07/2014 4:11:42 PM PDT
by
Truth29
To: jazusamo
The enviro-nazis will stop at nothing to bankrupt the nation. What they don't do to damage the nation and economy the feral government will do for them.
11
posted on
07/07/2014 4:12:40 PM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(The Obamas Black skin has morphed into Teflon thanks to the Obama Media)
To: umgud
Exactly, but it wouldn’t surprise me if they try it, they’ve done it before.
12
posted on
07/07/2014 4:13:37 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
To: umgud
These green bozos are going to drive a mega-industry out of Washington State and leave a lot of people jobless who once had great paying jobs. Not that they give a flip.
13
posted on
07/07/2014 4:13:42 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
To: jazusamo
Don’t forget this is the agency that banned over the counter asthma inhalers. That’s just mean.
14
posted on
07/07/2014 4:14:41 PM PDT
by
umgud
(I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
To: dennisw
15
posted on
07/07/2014 4:16:13 PM PDT
by
umgud
(I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Could very well be, the unions are ticked over 0bummer and Keystone.
16
posted on
07/07/2014 4:18:17 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Maybe Boeing should only build wind turbines.. the enviromentalists don't give a cr*p how many American Bald Eagles get slaughtered at wind farms.
To: CivilWarBrewing
You’re right, the enviro-nazis would sacrifice them all to stop using petroleum.
Plus they want dams destroyed because of salmon but don’t give a whit about eagles and other birds...hypocrites.
18
posted on
07/07/2014 4:49:25 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
To: RightGeek
" fish consumption rates? "
Well, the fish DO consume THEIR water after all........
19
posted on
07/07/2014 5:02:07 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: RightGeek
EPA - The Eating Protection Agency
Seriously, pisspoor article. Should have mentioned what were the pollutants Boeing generated that when into the waters and what kind of health threats they posed, or might pose.
Having worked on environmental cases of this type, the first thing one asks is “What is the pollutant” and “what are the suspected or known sources of them.”
Then you take it from there re health protection, job protection and sane, feasible environmental protection technology available to correct any real problems.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson