Skip to comments.GOP CONGRESSMAN: Mitt Romney Is Going To Run In 2016, And He's Going To Win
Posted on 07/08/2014 7:21:13 AM PDT by PoloSec
At least one prominent Republican lawmaker thinks two-time Republican presidential candidate and 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney will run again in 2016.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) told MSNBC's Chris Matthews that he thinks the "Draft Mitt" hype is real.
"I think he actually is going to run for president. He probably doesn't want me to say that," Chaffetz said during an interview on "Hardball" Monday night.
"A hundred times he says he's not, but Mitt Romney has always accomplished what he's set out to do. I think he's [been] proven right on a lot of stuff. I happen to be in the camp that thinks he's actually going to run, and I think he will be the next president of the United States."
Off and on since the debut of his Netflix documentary, "Mitt," speculation about a possible
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
...just when I was beginning to like Jason.
Deja Vu all over again.
Not with my vote.
Boston dog catcher? Salt Lake City vector control coordinator? Mayor of Detroit?
Team Romney already has it “in” for every
Remember Gov. Palin.
Remember the Speaker
Remember ... many more ...
Mitt I was for you last go-around. (basically because, Palin bowed out, and I didn’t really believe in the alternatives)
Now I just want you to go away.
Mitt go away. We have other candidates, who haven’t lost an election.
Who couldn’t see this coming? The Romney Redux.
The GOP should try running a conservative now and then. Ronald Reagan comes to mind.
Hello? Reagan is dead.
So the lying progressive Liberal is going to run again?
Look forward to another 4 years of Democratic control of our government.
The GOP-E seems determined to hand our country over to the Marxists.
Please God, no. Amen.
If the GOP establishment decides it’s going to be Romney again,then it’s Mitt part 2.They figure the idea of Hillary as president will get us all to vote for him.
NO, no, a thousand times no...
So basically its a choice between Clinton and Warren.
“If the GOP establishment decides its going to be Romney again,then its Mitt part 2.They figure the idea of Hillary as president will get us all to vote for him.”
Oh. Hell. No.
omgosh! no Romney, no Huckabee, no McCain... please go away!!!!!!!!!!!
What’s your point? I was citing Reagan as an example of a winner and one that the GOP should incorporate into their playbook. The GOP hasn’t done well running RINOs so maybe they should try running a conservative. Reagan is not around but his spirit still is.
That would be losing for a third time.
He's struck out twice... he wants an inning-ending third strikeout.
Well we know Reagan is dead. He didn’t mean literally that Reagan should run again. He meant that a conservative in the mold of Reagan should run for president.
Romney made a lot of mistakes but the biggest was relying too heavily on his sons’ advice. His 5 sons had no real political experience yet Romney took their (poor) advice time and time again. Romney acts and looks phony and stiff in public. He needs to just go away.
Figures it’s one from Utah that has this delusion.
“Not with my vote.”
Die, RINOs, die.
Die, die, die, die..........!!!
“Hello? Reagan is dead.”
Still, better candidate than Mitt.
One term Governor.
Lost the presidential primary to the guy who eventually lost to Obama.
Lost to Obama.
Wondered why Steffie asked him about states banning contraceptives.
Cowered while Candy shuffled through her stack of stuff to find the transcript.
Yeah, what a resume.
The man can only win one home states that’s UT he lost in the other states he resides in (MI, MA, NH, and CA)
Romney won’t run so it doesn’t matter. Conservatives did not unify last time which is how Romney got nominated. I see no evidence yet of conservatives getting their act together and rallying behind a single candidate. The only potential unifying candidate I see right now is Ted Cruz. However he will face Rubio and the RNC machine.
That is usually the point. The other ‘person’ is so bad that any vote for the opposite is still a slide to the left and more .gov.
Romney will never be president.
Whatever his faults — and he has many — the most glaring is this: he hasn’t got the will to win.
He could have cut the Kenyan’s throat and bled him out completely with honest but ruthless and well-targeted campaign ads.
He could have left the tyrannical dung beetle squashed and dying on the debate stage like the insect that he is.
But Romney chose not to. Why? Open for debate. Many will say it’s because, in essence, he’s “one of them”. And that may be the case.
But “why” doesn’t really matter. The fact that he’s a bloodless, gutless empty suit who simply believes it’s his turn — but isn’t willing to fight for the prize — means he never WILL win the prize.
The Gop didn't run Ron Reagan...In fact, the GOP opposed Reagan...
Good luck with that. Better than Hillary or Elizabeth the Indian, but not by much.
How is Mitt going to explain this return to his pro-abortion position and returning to being against the GOP pro-life party platform after he won the nomination after fighting to convince conservatives that he had switched to pro-life when he started running for president in 2005?
August 27, 2012 CBS interview with Scott Pelley:
PELLEY: Well, the platform as written at this convention for the Republicans does not allow for exceptions on abortion with regard to the health of the mother or rape or incest. Is that where you are?
ROMNEY: No. My position has been clear throughout this campaign. Im in favor of abortion being legal in the case of rape and incest, and the health and life of the mother.
I won’t be voting for him.
I think it’s very unlikely he can win the nomination.
And if he did, he’d lose in November 2016.
It’s going to take an inspiring candidate to beat the Dems, and Mitt ain’t it.
Just great. Another Bob Dole, Bob Dole election.
he might run again..
but he won’t win.
You think conservatives sat it out last go around. you ain’t seen nothing yet.
add Bush to your list as well.
Were you around in July of 1980? Do you recall the GOP National Convention? Here’s a fact: Reagan won in a landslide.
we would have national Romneycare and it’d pull the R party down like it is the D party..
Not that the R is not doing a good enough job destroying their own party already.
i thought his comment might come up... i have two reasons for not including him on my list... one is, he has never run for President, and my list was made up of Republicans who previously have thrown their hats in the race... the second reason is, i really do not think he has a snowball's chance in hell to be the nominee...
We need a solid conservative FIGHTER this time, and that’s not Romney on either count. I think he’s a good man and would have been several orders of magnitude less damaging to America than 0bama, but we need a president who will be willing to go for the entrenched bureaucracy’s blood. I won’t vote for him in the primary.
I think Mitt is going to run also. He is likely wearing Ann down to give him the go ahead. Men know how to get around their wives. Its going to create a terrible problem for guys like Cruz and Perry. Who can compete with Mitt’s money and the big donors who would have backed Jeb will be happy to go with Mitt.
Let's not forget that one of the leaders of that "Republican" group who opposed all things Reagan was George Romney. Mitt is a natural heir to the liberal wing of the Republican Party - he got his politics from his family.
Such a bone-headed stunt as a Draft Romney movement could doom the Republican Party. Re-nominating Romney might be enough to entice Palin, Cruz, or some other viable, legitimate conservative to agree to run as a third-party candidate. Could a conservative win in a three-way race with Hillary and Romney? Probably not but he or she could be competitive. It would be interesting to see how a sincere, energetic, personable conservative (like Palin or Cruz) would fare again two politically tone-deaf empty suits like Romney and Hillary. But what is certain in this scenario is that the Republican Party would become Humpty Dumpty and all the king's men and all the king's horses could not put it back together again.
he can’t win. your right. that is why the MSM/Rats will select him for the gop.
I’d rather see Jason run.
Ted Cruz & Jason.
Or Ted Cruz & Scott Walker
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.