Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kansas was supposed to be the GOPís tax-cut paradise. Now it can barely pay its bills.
VOX ^ | 07/08/2014 | Andrew Prokop

Posted on 07/08/2014 11:31:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

In 2012, Kansas governor Sam Brownback signed a massive tax cut into law, arguing that it would boost the state's economy. Eventually, he hoped to eliminate individual income taxes entirely. "Our place, Kansas, will show the path, the difficult path, for America to go in these troubled times," he said.

National conservative activists raved. Patrick Gleason of Americans for Tax Reform said Kansas was "the story of the next decade." The Cato Institute praised Brownback's "impressive" tax cuts and gave him an "A" on fiscal policy. And the Weekly Standard's Bill Kristol said that, if reelected, Brownback would be "a formidable presidential possibility."

Yet though Brownback is running for reelection this fall in a deep red state, he's trailed his Democratic challenger in 3 of the 4 most recent polls — and his marquee tax cut appears to be the main reason. Kansas is now hundreds of millions of dollars short in revenue collection, its job growth has lagged the rest of the nation, and Moody's has cut the state's bond rating. "Governor Brownback came in here with an agenda to reduce the size of government, reduce taxes, and create a great economic boom," says University of Kansas professor Burdett Loomis. "Now there's been a dramatic decline in revenues, no great increase in economic activity, and we've got red ink until the cows come home."

(Excerpt) Read more at vox.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: kansas; sambrownback; spending; taxcuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 07/08/2014 11:31:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah, he forgot that when you cut taxes you have to trim the budget too. Cannot keep spending when your income goes down. Stupid.


2 posted on 07/08/2014 11:33:18 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t worry... we still have Detroit and Flint is “hotting up” according to latest headlines.


3 posted on 07/08/2014 11:33:46 AM PDT by Lake Living
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

I was getting ready to ask if they kept spending the same...


4 posted on 07/08/2014 11:34:00 AM PDT by CommieCutter ("For an idea to be too simplistic, it must first be proven wrong" --Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

All your money are belong to us


5 posted on 07/08/2014 11:35:01 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Wasn’t it Arthur Laffer who argued that increased economic growth due to tax cuts would deliver more revenue that would help cushion the impact of reduced revenue collection?


6 posted on 07/08/2014 11:35:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t see any deficits.


7 posted on 07/08/2014 11:36:21 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

whats actual tax revenue. the surplus information don’t prove or disprove tax cut is the cause of the bankruptcy. It could be overspending


8 posted on 07/08/2014 11:37:37 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

I think they’re PROJECTING deficits by looking at the trend.


9 posted on 07/08/2014 11:37:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Same here; I still see a surplus. What’s the problem? How can they not “pay their bills” and still have a surplus?


10 posted on 07/08/2014 11:38:00 AM PDT by Doctor 2Brains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Cheerleading from liberal groups like Amer for Tax Reform (pro Amnesty, pro Islamic Terrorist), CATO (Amnesty Liberal, Open Borders Liberal, One World Liberal), and Bill Kristol (all liberal)....doesn’t help the Conservative pedigree

Surprised Chamber of Communists hasn’t chimed in


11 posted on 07/08/2014 11:38:49 AM PDT by DisorderOnBorder (Haley Barbour rather work for drug cartels than Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So, the budget surplus is declining, but still there.....

Why exactly is that a bad thing...the more excess revenue, the more wasteful spending.

If the government is taking in more than it’s spending, it should not only cut taxes to trim the surplus for the next year, it should rebate the excess to prevent its’ waste.

And yes...merely voicing that point of view makes me an extremist.


12 posted on 07/08/2014 11:39:30 AM PDT by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I second what others have said. A true conservative cuts spending in addition to taxes. If he cut taxes and kept spending like a George Bush-type Compassionate Conservative, then he is a failure.


13 posted on 07/08/2014 11:40:16 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Wasn’t it Arthur Laffer who argued that increased economic growth due to tax cuts would deliver more revenue that would help cushion the impact of reduced revenue collection?

He said it would in certain circumstances, in certain amounts - that's why his theory on this is called "the Laffer Curve" - perhaps Kansas over shot, or perhaps there are other things to consider…..spending, etc...

14 posted on 07/08/2014 11:40:32 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Why should any State run a surplus? If a State does run a surplus, invest the money and reinvest the gain. Save the money and interest proceeds for a downturn. Don’t spend the principle. That’s what real people do.


15 posted on 07/08/2014 11:41:17 AM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deco et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Doesn’t the legislature that cut the taxes also control the spending?


16 posted on 07/08/2014 11:45:35 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

Very few governments will rebate overtaxed citizens, preferring instead to spend the money on pet projects.


17 posted on 07/08/2014 11:48:09 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Government spending should be a break even process, with revenue from taxes and fees matching outgoing expenses, just like everybody who has to balance a checkbook. Allow a small surplus to cover for contingencies, otherwise I see no reason to run a huge surplus (i.e. your tax dollars being tied up by the government).


18 posted on 07/08/2014 11:48:22 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

One thing that needs to be pointed out is the huge amount of capital gains were realized in 2012 before the law changed and the tax went up. They knew it would result in lower revenue in subsequent years.


19 posted on 07/08/2014 11:49:20 AM PDT by mfreddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nationally that’s what happened in the early 2000s. The revenue increased with lower taxes. But they kept spending more while keeping it under 20% of GDP.


20 posted on 07/08/2014 11:49:27 AM PDT by CommieCutter ("For an idea to be too simplistic, it must first be proven wrong" --Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson