Skip to comments.
Senate Democrats unveil legislation to reverse Hobby Lobby ruling
The Hill ^
| July 9, 2014
| Alexander Bolton 
and Mike Lillis
Posted on 07/09/2014 9:10:41 AM PDT by maggief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
07/09/2014 9:10:41 AM PDT
by
maggief
To: maggief
Doesn’t legislation have begin in the House?
2
posted on
07/09/2014 9:12:39 AM PDT
by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: maggief
Our bill simply says that your boss cannot get between you and your own healthcare,How do you "get between" a person and what you provide for that person?
3
posted on
07/09/2014 9:13:33 AM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: Farmer Dean
Is that one of the laws we are still following?
4
posted on
07/09/2014 9:13:47 AM PDT
by
jospehm20
To: Farmer Dean
Just bills having to do with finance.
What needs to be stated, however, is that the requirement in Obamacare was ruled to be unconstitutional,
and the Senate thinks they can pass some law that says it’s not?
5
posted on
07/09/2014 9:14:50 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: maggief
Wack job misstatement of the decision does not a political campaign make. Nice try Harry, but even the news media can’t keep this one going.
Even if their claims were true and not bare lies; the rate at which Obummer is screwing up the lives of Americans will keep this from catching so much as a breeze in the press.
6
posted on
07/09/2014 9:15:44 AM PDT
by
Steamburg
(Other people's money is the only language a politician respects)
To: Farmer Dean
No, but the house can do what with this bill what Harry Reid has done with every republican bill from the house. Nothing.
To: Farmer Dean
Spending bills, not sore loser bills!
8
posted on
07/09/2014 9:16:39 AM PDT
by
goodtomato
(I'm really, really blessed!)
To: maggief
Dead on arrival legislation that is intended to do nothing more than inspire the stupid to keep voting democrat.
9
posted on
07/09/2014 9:17:00 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
To: maggief
Typical crap from the pro-abortion Democrats. Of the twenty types of contraception available for women under Obamacare, Hobby Lobby only objected to paying for four which caused after-contraception abortion.
To: maggief
said over 60,000 women in Alaska who use birth control would be impacted by the decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores.
Now there is a, 'donor', list I would like to get my hands on...
11
posted on
07/09/2014 9:19:11 AM PDT
by
Delta Dawn
(Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
To: maggief
It should read: “the obama-democrat supreme court neutering” bill. The democrats refuse to follow the rule of law, therefore, all democrat politicians and followers should be rounded up and tried for insurrection, and either imprisoned, or banished from the United States for good. I considered summary execution, but they shouldn’t be allowed to be let off that easily.
12
posted on
07/09/2014 9:20:11 AM PDT
by
factoryrat
(We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
To: Farmer Dean
Any, ‘appropriations’, bill is required to start in the house. That is why it is said that the House has the power of the purse...
13
posted on
07/09/2014 9:22:02 AM PDT
by
Delta Dawn
(Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
To: jospehm20
"Is that one of the laws we are still following?" Exactly!
14
posted on
07/09/2014 9:25:27 AM PDT
by
lormand
(Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)
To: maggief
If democrats can do this, why don’t they join hands with us and close the damn border?
And send illegals home...
And do it NOW.
15
posted on
07/09/2014 9:25:45 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Remember the oath is to "support and defend the Constitution" - not the President. FRrfreedom4u)
To: maggief
Senate Democrats introduced legislation on Wednesday to effectively reverse the Supreme Courts decision last week exempting employers from having to provide insurance coverage for contraception.
When you start with a complete and utter LIE the rest is immaterial!
The Supreme Court SPECIFICALLY stated that this ruling could NOT be used to disallow blood transfusions and overall medical care! So, this whole argument is simply a made-up ruse to confuse the already confused low-info voters - PERIOD!
More importantly, Democrats (and ONLY Democrats) have FORCED companies to provide healthcare to their employees, and they are attempting to tell them exactly what kind of care must be provided, but then they turn around and want to say that employers shouldn't be allowed to make decisions about your healthcare?!? How exactly does that work? The Obamacare debacle actually allows employers to completely DROP healthcare (at which point they will have made a decision about your access to healthcare) and again, that is IN THE LAW that Harry championed and voted for!
So, Democrats specifically allow for employers to make decisions about EVERYTHING and everyone's healthcare, so why not those specific abortion causing drugs which the company would have a personal aversion to?
16
posted on
07/09/2014 9:31:31 AM PDT
by
ExTxMarine
(PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
To: maggief
Obamacare is chocked full of entitlements and has in effect made Sex an entitlement. If American women are too dumb or too lazy to protect and provide for themselves birth control, available free at women's clinics and for far less than the tattoos some females afford themselves but expect the government, read taxpayer, to provide them with the necessary accouterments for safe sex, then they have demeaned and cheapened themselves forever.
17
posted on
07/09/2014 9:32:00 AM PDT
by
yoe
(I voted against that incompetent, lying, flip-flopping, insince, double-talking, radical-socialist)
To: maggief
“Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska), a cosponsor who is in the midst of a tough re-election contest, said over 60,000 women in Alaska who use birth control would be impacted by the decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores.”
I did a quick store locator search on Hobby Lobby’s site and there is no store anywhere in the entire state of Alaska.
Lying liars lie....
18
posted on
07/09/2014 9:33:00 AM PDT
by
CSM
(Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
To: maggief
Kinda funny. The SCOTUS decided that the CONCEPT is unconstitutional. You can’t just make a new law to get around that decision unless it is missing the unconstitutional part.
It will also be stillborn in the house.
19
posted on
07/09/2014 9:33:55 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: maggief
What if the boss doesnt believe in any medical care?"
For 99% of our history, the "boss" DIDN'T have to provide any medical care. That's why it was called a "benefit."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson