Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PAT ROBERTS ON TEA PARTY'S CHALLENGE OF HIM: 'I MIGHT BE NEXT'
Breitbart ^ | 7/9/2014 | Matthew Boyle

Posted on 07/09/2014 1:42:35 PM PDT by bkopto

Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) told Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) that he may be the next victim of the anti-incumbent Tea Party mood sweeping America with the defeat of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor earlier this year, Politico’s Manu Raju reports.

“I might be next,” a “deadly serious” Roberts told Corker on a ride on the underground senate subway, Roberts recounted in an interview with Politico’s Raju in Kansas. “You never know.”

Roberts was referring to how Dave Brat beat Cantor using an anti-incumbency style that Roberts’ current conservative primary opponent, Dr. Milton Wolf, is following. Wolf—President Barack Obama’s second cousin—has emerged as a leader in the Tea Party movement over the past few years, and his fiery style of anti-political class politics has played well into the conservative new media brand of grassroots politician.

Wolf’s story aside, however, Roberts’ situation is eerily similar to other incumbents who’ve been dropping at an abnormally high rate.

“He’s been dogged by questions over his residency ever since a February report in The New York Times that he rents a room in the home of longtime friends and donors when he returns to the state,” Politico’s Raju wrote. “Though Roberts does own half of a duplex in Dodge City that he has rented out for years and previously lived in, the issue is reminiscent of the problems that doomed longtime Indiana Sen. Dick Lugar two years ago.”

Raju asked Roberts about the residency question, at which point he sought to differentiate his situation from Lugar’s.

“Dick Lugar had his farm, for goodness sakes, and thought it was his home; that’s not the same thing,” Roberts said during the interview with his wife in the room. “I own the property there, I pay taxes there, I vote there. He didn’t do that.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: uniparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
From his lips to God's ear.
1 posted on 07/09/2014 1:42:35 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bkopto

We can only hope, jackass


2 posted on 07/09/2014 1:45:20 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
Pat Roberts is a solid Conservative.

Milton Wolf is a nut case, a publicity hound, a liar and a fraud.

Yes, Wolf is related to Obama, and the similarities are very obvious now.

3 posted on 07/09/2014 1:45:39 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon; All
It is more than likely, should Wolf win, that Wolf will face Federal charges for violation of patient privacy.

Wolf posted X-Rays of gunshot victims on his Facebook account.

Wolf is an idiot.

4 posted on 07/09/2014 1:46:57 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

politicians are like diapers..

they need to be changed often, and for the same reason


5 posted on 07/09/2014 1:48:18 PM PDT by joe fonebone (a socialist is just a juvenile communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

This tea party guy will be voting for Roberts


6 posted on 07/09/2014 1:49:40 PM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

He may be an idiot, but Roberts is trying to pull a Thad Cochran with race baiting, which renders him despicable in my eyes.


7 posted on 07/09/2014 1:50:34 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
Works for me.
8 posted on 07/09/2014 1:52:10 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Milton R. Wolf is an American physician.
He is a Tea Party movement-aligned activist
who is challenging incumbent Kansas U.S. Senator Pat Roberts
in the 2014 United States Senate election.
-
http://www.miltonwolf.com/
-
Kansas Primary - Tuesday 5 August 2014
-


9 posted on 07/09/2014 1:52:48 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
He is a Tea Party movement-aligned activist

Right! Active for about 6 months. Never any activity before that time.

10 posted on 07/09/2014 1:55:49 PM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

What has Pat Roberts said about Thad Cochran and the Mississippi run-off?

If he has supported Cochran - cut him off, now!
If he has said nothing - you are either against lying and cheating, or you’re abetting it!
If he has come out opposing Cochran’s tactics - re-elect him!


11 posted on 07/09/2014 1:57:55 PM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Gonna quote you on this one. (lol)


12 posted on 07/09/2014 1:58:18 PM PDT by lulu16 (May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

If the name was NOT on the xray, then there is no violation of privacy laws.


13 posted on 07/09/2014 1:58:53 PM PDT by bkopto (Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

how are you related to Pat Roberts?


14 posted on 07/09/2014 2:00:00 PM PDT by fish hawk (no tyrant can remain in power without the consent and cooperation of his victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

I’m voting FOR Wolf.


15 posted on 07/09/2014 2:05:04 PM PDT by Crazieman (Are you naive enough to think VOTING will fix this entrenched system?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Has he been solid this year cause he has opposition?

Note that Lamar Alexander says he’s a solid Conservative too. He even runs ads showing him challenging Obama tho he voted to fund obamacare and increase the debt limit.


16 posted on 07/09/2014 2:10:28 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
You are wrong.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Wolf had no right to post any xrays on his Facebook page.
17 posted on 07/09/2014 2:11:46 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

WHEN did Roberts do any “race baiting”

That is silly


18 posted on 07/09/2014 2:12:35 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58; Viennacon; bkopto
Pat Roberts is a solid Conservative.

With your posting history, that endorsement doesn't mean much.
19 posted on 07/09/2014 2:14:35 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th; All
Milton Wolf is an egomaniac, a liar and a fraud.

Wolf has never put up a yard sign, walked door to door, or campaigned for ANYONE else his entire life.

Wolf doesn't even vote very often.

Wolf is a fake, Wolf has earned the disrespect of the major 2nd Amendment players in Kansas by trying fake “lifelong” 2nd Amendment support.

Wolf posted mostly party pictures in his home, prior to announcing, then he scrubbed his FB page and has pretended to have deep religious faith that was never before apparent.

Wolf has lied repeatedly about his meeting with Obama, his Cousin. Yes they met, but Wolf never “confronted” Obama.

20 posted on 07/09/2014 2:16:08 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3175672/posts


21 posted on 07/09/2014 2:17:17 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Yeah, mega-dittos on that.

They’ve run ads calling him a life-long Kansas resident.

And this from a veteran.

Good grief. Nothing worse than the uneducated.


22 posted on 07/09/2014 2:18:52 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
I am a solid conservative.

I think birthers are often kooks, and I think those who oppose abortion restrictions based on “purity” arguments are also silly.

I have helped defeat more incumbent Republicans than anyone you know.

You just don't like it when I tell flakey loose cannons that they are on the wrong path.

23 posted on 07/09/2014 2:19:03 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Pat Roberts is a liar. He is not a Kansas resident, unless that has changed.

He has a chair in somebody’s house.


24 posted on 07/09/2014 2:19:37 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

“Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) told Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) that he may be the next victim of the anti-incumbent Tea Party mood sweeping America”

I believe the “Tea Party” to be nothing more than the republican party’s Conservative base. If the republican acknowledge this the republicans would need to stop using the term Conservative, to them it’s just an obligatory campaign slogan.


25 posted on 07/09/2014 2:21:27 PM PDT by duffee (NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

... the gaffe reinforces a criticism that Roberts is too close to Washington and out of touch with his state. The New York Times reported in February that the senator is a “virtual stranger” in his home state, renting out his Dodge City property and staying with two donors when he stays in Kansas.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3176390/posts


26 posted on 07/09/2014 2:21:44 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

That is not YOUR call.
The US Senate says Roberts is a Kansas Resident.
The Kansas Department of Revenue says Roberts is a Kansas Resident.
The Governor, the Kansas AG, the Kansas Secretary of State all say Roberts is a Kansas Resident.
Nearly every member of Congress, Senate and House, maintain a home in the DC area.
This is silly.


27 posted on 07/09/2014 2:23:11 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
It's not silly. He's a Washington bureaucrat who hardly shows up nor lives him his “home’ states.

It's a pathetic jokes and a lie to Kansas residents for him to portray himself as he does in his official ad.

This is just one reason the whole nation is screwed up.

Hope he gets booted, this fraud.

28 posted on 07/09/2014 2:25:03 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

state - singular - typo


29 posted on 07/09/2014 2:26:09 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Not everyone in Kansas is happy about having a Senator from Virginia representing us in the U.S. Senate. The guy left Kansas in 1957.

(a ping to you since you’re on top of this)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3176390/posts?page=10#10


30 posted on 07/09/2014 2:27:08 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Politicians and diapers need to be changed often, and for the same reason.


31 posted on 07/09/2014 2:27:20 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
I think birthers are often kooks, and I think those who oppose abortion restrictions based on “purity” arguments are also silly.

I have helped defeat more incumbent Republicans than anyone you know.

You just don't like it when I tell flakey loose cannons that they are on the wrong path.


Naww, you're more of a moderate than a conservative, and your past posting history, and this post in particular proves it.

Anyone using the perjorative term "purity" arguments when it comes to conservatives, ain't a conservative.

You seem to be a legend in your own mind though.
32 posted on 07/09/2014 2:27:28 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Wolf won’t get 30% of the vote.
Wolf is a JOKE in Kansas. He has virtually no support.


33 posted on 07/09/2014 2:27:44 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

joke - sorry typo a lot today


34 posted on 07/09/2014 2:27:54 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Well, that may be true. I don’t know.

What I do know is I don’t like some guy in any state who doesn’t actually reside there a significant part of the time.

He is not a state representative in those cases; he’s an actor.


35 posted on 07/09/2014 2:28:58 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MrB

yep


36 posted on 07/09/2014 2:29:15 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
I helped pass a late term abortion restriction in Kansas which required George Tiller to get a 2nd Opinion before he could do a late term abortion.

Tiller violated that law, and it got him charged in criminal court. (unfortunately Tiller won, but he shouldn't have).

The silly “no compromise” crowd fought that legislation before it was signed into law.

I know Kansas.

I know Pat Roberts.

Roberts should win and Roberts will win, easily.

Don't waste time and money on the gadfly phony Milton Wolf!

37 posted on 07/09/2014 2:30:30 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

I am rather confident that Roberts spends more time in Kansas than either of your two Senators.

I see Pat Roberts IN KANSAS on a fairly regular basis.


38 posted on 07/09/2014 2:33:17 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

And WHERE does Pat Roberts ‘live’ when you see him in Kansas on a regular basis?

Is he staying in the chair of one of his donors?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/02/07/pat-roberts-doesnt-have-his-own-home-in-kansas/

Pat Roberts doesn’t have his own home in Kansas

~~~In an interview, ******the three-term senator acknowledged that he did not have a home of his own in Kansas******. The house on a country club golf course that he lists as his voting address belongs to two longtime supporters and donors — C. Duane and Phyllis Ross — and he says he stays with them when he is in the area. He established his voting address there the day before his challenger, Milton Wolf, announced his candidacy last fall, arguing that Mr. Roberts was out of touch with his High Plains roots.

“I have full access to the recliner,” the senator joked.~~~


39 posted on 07/09/2014 2:36:40 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
You are wrong. You have no idea what you are talking about.

Dude. I do know what I'm talking about. I'm a radiologist. You don't have a clue about this subject.

40 posted on 07/09/2014 2:37:17 PM PDT by bkopto (Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
HIPAA

You are not telling the truth.

Medical Records are not to be released to the public, period.

And, Wolf made clear they were all gun shot victims. How many of those are there?

And the dates were on the X-Rays.

Yes, you should know better, which means you are not telling the truth.

41 posted on 07/09/2014 2:40:35 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Roberts OWNS a home in Dodge City which Roberts rents to someone else.

You are not telling the truth at all.


42 posted on 07/09/2014 2:41:43 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

I’m telling more truth than you are.

Roberts does not have a residence in Kansas.

And you know that’s what this is about.

Are you a donor or just a campaign worker?

Why does Pat Roberts need to use a home owned by OTHER PEOPLE for a voting address?

Truth? Ha.


43 posted on 07/09/2014 2:43:30 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

You must go fishing with Roberts, to get all bent out of shape like you are. Sheesh. Have a nice day.


44 posted on 07/09/2014 2:43:38 PM PDT by bkopto (Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

HUH? So you think someone who does not own real estate and rents can not serve?

Roberts owns a home that he rents out.

Roberts, himself, rents another room elsewhere.

So what?


45 posted on 07/09/2014 2:45:33 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Yeah so if you have a double-wide in Zimbabwe that you rent out, that makes you a Zimbabwe resident and you can be ambassador.

That is Pat Robert’s logic.


46 posted on 07/09/2014 2:46:58 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
“Protected Health Information. The Privacy Rule protects all “individually identifiable health information” held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associate, in any form or media, whether electronic, paper, or oral. The Privacy Rule calls this information “protected health information (PHI).”12

“Individually identifiable health information” is information, including demographic data, that relates to:
•the individual’s past, present or future physical or mental health or condition,
•the provision of health care to the individual, or
•the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to the individual,

and that identifies the individual or for which there is a reasonable basis to believe it can be used to identify the individual.13 Individually identifiable health information includes many common identifiers (e.g., name, address, birth date, Social Security Number).

The Privacy Rule excludes from protected health information employment records that a covered entity maintains in its capacity as an employer and education and certain other records subject to, or defined in, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. §1232g.

De-Identified Health Information. There are no restrictions on the use or disclosure of de-identified health information.14 De-identified health information neither identifies nor provides a reasonable basis to identify an individual. There are two ways to de-identify information; either: (1) a formal determination by a qualified statistician; or (2) the removal of specified identifiers of the individual and of the individual’s relatives, household members, and employers is required, and is adequate only if the covered entity has no actual knowledge that the remaining information could be used to identify the individual.15”
http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/summary/index.html


Your own license is in jeopardy! You need to study the law.
Again, you have NO IDEA what you are talking about.
47 posted on 07/09/2014 2:47:21 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

The Tea Party has done great things. It is a shame that many try to pick up the mantel of that generalized group and claim it for their own, without substance and accomplishments to back it up.

While Roberts has been a good Senator and had a good but not perfect adherence to conservative standards, he is certainly not a THAD.

Wolf made an interesting challenger when he was going to run on the issues. There are posters on this forum that have met him and we all hoped for the best. That being said, every news story about the challenge by Wolf is about smear and BS and not about conservative issues — those are the issues that would make Wolf a true representative of the Tea Party values.

I don’t live in Kansas any more as I did for decades, but if I did, I would have little cause so far to support Wolf.

Roberts is not a Cochran and neither is Wolf a Chris McDaniel who ran on the issues. Wolf must run on his ability to defend and represent the conservative values and that has not happened in the recent months.


48 posted on 07/09/2014 2:55:39 PM PDT by KC Burke (Gowdy for Supreme Court)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle; Kansas58

Thanks. I have been reading, but not engaging. I don’t want to pick a fight with Kansas 58 who has good reason to support Roberts and I would probably do the same if I had experienced a similar set of circumstances.

The residency issue is certainly a valid one despite what the political guild has to say about it. Incumbents are protected like they are some national treasure. Roberts was essentially gifted his Congressional seat when Keith Sebelius retired, reward for his years of service on his staff. The fact that his father was the Chairman of the Republican National Committee certainly helped with all of that. He moved up to the Senate in the great Republican tradition of senority. He sees no need to live in Kansas, as Kansas 58 points out, perfectly legal for him to do so. It does matter to me as far too many of our elected representatives see political service as their birthright and career. The Democrats have practiced this scheme for years and our government is less effective because of it.

I’ll vote for Wolf. Roberts is not in real danger, at least not yet.


49 posted on 07/09/2014 3:04:21 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

I’m good with the conservative things. Just that someone who is a Virginia resident should not portray themselves as “a lifelong Kansas resident”, when they indeed are NOT a Kansas resident, but a former resident who visits and owns rental property.

The campaign ad is completely misleading. Were it not for FR, as an observer, I would not have known these things.


50 posted on 07/09/2014 3:09:28 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson