Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The case for Obama’s impeachment: The Constitution’s remedy for a lawless, imperial president
Fox News ^ | July 11, 2014 | By Sarah Palin

Posted on 07/11/2014 2:49:11 PM PDT by Resettozero

he next time you hear politicians denounce Barack Obama as a lawless, imperial president with a scandal-riddled administration, ask them what they’re going to do about it. Their gnashing of teeth over Obama’s self-granted omnipotence is repetitive.

Let’s agree with our ninth president, William Henry Harrison, who said there is nothing more corrupting, nothing more destructive than the exercise of unlimited power. We understand the problem. The only way for politicians to fix it is with a little less talk and a lot more action.

The Constitution provides the remedy for a president who commits “high crimes and misdemeanors.” It’s impeachment.

The only thing necessary to transform America into something unrecognizable is for good men to do nothing! To be clear, “high crimes and misdemeanors” are not necessarily ordinary criminal offenses. Our Framers used the term to signify a dereliction of duty, and the first duty of the president is to enforce our laws and preserve, protect, and defend our Constitution.

Alexander Hamilton described impeachable offenses as those “which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.” He explained that they are “political” offenses “as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.”

No serious person who is paying attention can deny that Obama and his administration have abused and violated the public trust and disregarded the Constitution. Let me count the ways.

Without notifying Congress as required by law, he set free terrorist prisoners at a time of war when they can return to the battlefield to kill our troops.

In violation of our Constitution, he regularly ignores court orders, changes laws by executive fiat, and refuses to enforce laws he doesn’t like, including our immigration laws.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gosarah; impeachment; impeachobama; obamalawless; palin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Bratch

PS, my congress critter is nothing but a tool of the chamber of commerce. He wakes up long enough to run for office again and between times you have to put a mirror to his face to see if he is breathing. There is however the trail of spittle that hangs from the corner of his mouth.


21 posted on 07/11/2014 3:28:19 PM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
The case for Obama’s impeachment: The Constitution’s remedy for a lawless, imperial traitorous president"

Fixed it.

22 posted on 07/11/2014 3:31:33 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
The best thing this congress can do is legal and financial subterfuge.

See, when you try, you CAN post coherently on your own without cutting and pasting.

Don't like any of your ideas on this thread; no thanks.

-30-
23 posted on 07/11/2014 3:38:00 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Irrelevent. Impeachment is a singular act. A trial by the Senate on the charges of impeachment is quite another.


24 posted on 07/11/2014 3:46:09 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Y’know. I remember you from another useless thread.

Forget it. Nothing to work with.


25 posted on 07/11/2014 3:46:54 PM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
You do understand that the House impeaches and the Senate votes to remove from office? Clinton was impeached but not removed.
26 posted on 07/11/2014 3:52:39 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: KC_Lion
Actually, I am doing another Kindle free run, starting Monday.


28 posted on 07/11/2014 3:59:39 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

29 posted on 07/11/2014 4:00:46 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

You and Sarah are right! All of these people around here and elsewhere are always talking about how Obama is trashing the Constitution and abusing powers but when someone says that its time for something to be done about it, they strink away


30 posted on 07/11/2014 4:07:00 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
what happens when the charges of impeachment are brought by the house and then referred to the spinate for trial and dingy harry ignores them. Won’t even give them a second look, ignores them and does not allow them to be brought to the spinate floor?

Well, the House could still impeach him regardless of what the Senate does - in theory anyway, but there aren't the votes for it even in the House. Not only not the votes for it, not even close to the votes for it. So the House wouldn't even be able to refer a successful impeachment to the Senate for trial.

Even if he does, what happens when the spinate is locked because neither side will cross the aisle to find obungo guilty?

It wouldn't be locked. It's far more likely that if it were brought up the majority of Republicans would vote against it. Harry Reid would probably be thrilled to bring such a thing up if he could because he knows it would rally Obama's dependent base who are currently not paying much attention to politics. The cries of racism alone would be a big boost for the Democrats in 2014.

Sarah Palin can say this because she isn't an elected representative of anyone or anything. It's easy to argue for things that don't have public support as a political commentator or from her perch on some realityTV show. Doesn't mean her points are wrong, only that elected office holders have to weigh public opinion and she doesn't.

What is it that people don't understand about this being a pointless exercise of gumflapping when the public is not even remotely close to supporting such a thing? Impeachment is a political endeavor, if the public doesn't support the effort it is counter productive waste of time. There is no way the public is ever going to support impeaching the first black......err half black...President. The man could eat a live baby on TV and the public would probably would find a reason to just let him pass his remaining years in office. Heck, they might not even support censure for even that.

31 posted on 07/11/2014 4:21:21 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW; Sequoyah101
The benefit of an impeachment would be the airing/disclosure of Obama’s high crimes.

Since the old media are complicit in the cover-up, articles of impeachment rather than a news record will serve as a permanent historical feature of His presidency.

And, if we should not recover our freedoms, if we should continue our head first dive into despotism, history will record that the people of the United States made one last effort to save their republic.

32 posted on 07/11/2014 4:22:01 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie; Sequoyah101

Absolutely agree!


33 posted on 07/11/2014 4:36:58 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Well, the House could still impeach him regardless of what the Senate does - in theory anyway, but there aren't the votes for it even in the House.

You don't know that. Listing his crimes would expose him and the "go along to get along" crowd wouldn't have any cover.

We the People need to get LOUD.

34 posted on 07/11/2014 4:39:05 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
She hit a home run IN THE FIRST SENTENCE:

Their gnashing of teeth over Obama’s self-granted omnipotence is repetitive.

35 posted on 07/11/2014 5:13:28 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
Wow.

YOU SPEAK FOR ME, SARAH.

36 posted on 07/11/2014 5:15:48 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
So say it already -- what will happen? Obama gets away with it anyway? And your point ...?
37 posted on 07/11/2014 5:18:42 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
What is it that people don't understand about this being a pointless exercise of gumflapping when the public is not even remotely close to supporting such a thing?

You, dear, are talking out your patoot, in polite parlance.

You have zero clue as to what "the public" is close to supporting, especially if you eliminate illegals and fraudulent "public" votes that decide elections. If not for frauds, malevolent forces like Reid, Franken, and Obama wouldn't even be in office.

You know, to the Democrat's Pepsi, Republicans aren't even Coke. They're decaf diet Coke, no guts at all, not even a buzz.

38 posted on 07/11/2014 5:25:16 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

It is unfortunate we have the mid-term elections coming up because of the effect it will have on the zero infobots if impeachment gets on the front burner. For those who remember the Clinton impeachment, we saw the Republicans lose five House seats in the 1998 election and no change in the Senate. This marked first time since 1822 that the party not in control of the White House failed to gain seats in the mid-term election of a lame duck President’s second term. It is as if the Dems are baiting the Republicans with Zer0’s bizarre actions. They would love to start talk of impeachment. That way they can gin up their lazy base and mount a stronger challenge to the Republicans. We may be seeing the Democrats laying a trap for the elections. It is how they work.

As 2ndDivisionVet wrote:

“He could massacre a troop of girl scouts on the White House lawn during the Easter Egg roll, butcher them, barbecue them and serve them to all the participants and he still wouldn’t be impeached.”

All the while, the press would ask Mooselle what kind of spice rub he used and praise her for her potato salad while drinking the White House Kool-Aid.

I would love to see an impeachment. I have cried for impeachment on the Free Republic. However, it is part of the living room conversation reserved for the adults. It is fantastic we have Sarah Palin in the room to start the conversation rolling. As for the zer0 infobots, they can stay in their bedrooms and play with their Facebook and Twitter friends and talk about who has the sexy booty. I want them to be oblivious to the mounting storm awaiting the Dems next November. I want them to forget about voting in November as they forgot about our nation, when they voted the second term for that Yahoo called Zer0.


39 posted on 07/11/2014 5:33:10 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Wow. YOU SPEAK FOR ME, SARAH.

She minced no words in this second article in two days. No gamesmanship this time. She's genuinely concerned for our Nation's immediate future and so am I.
40 posted on 07/11/2014 5:34:47 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson