Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner: House Republicans Will Sue Obama Over Employer Mandate Delay
Townhall.com ^ | July 11, 2014 | Daniel Doherty

Posted on 07/11/2014 6:29:05 PM PDT by Kaslin

The rule of the law and the separation of powers are indispensable to our system of government. And yet, according to House Republicans, the president has violated his oath of office one too many times by encroaching on the rights of the legislative branch and re-writing laws as he sees fit. Hence why Republican House Speaker John Boehner is filing a lawsuit against him.

Obviously, there are many examples of President Obama circumventing Congress to advance his legislative agenda, but the Speaker of the House ultimately decided to sue him for a very specific reason: He unilaterally delayed implementing a provision under the Affordable Care Act that was wholly outside his purview.

“Today we’re releasing a draft resolution that will authorize the House to file suit over the way President Obama unilaterally changed the employer mandate,” Boehner’s office said in a statement yesterday. “In 2013, the president changed the health care law without a vote of Congress, effectively creating his own law by literally waiving the employer mandate and the penalties for failing to comply with it. That’s not the way our system of government was designed to work. No president should have the power to make laws on his or her own."

Boehner continued:

“As I’ve said, this isn't about Republicans versus Democrats; it’s about the Legislative Branch versus the Executive Branch, and above all protecting the Constitution," he wrote. "The Constitution states that the president must faithfully execute the laws, and spells out that only the Legislative Branch has the power to legislate. The current president believes he has the power to make his own laws – at times even boasting about it. He has said that if Congress won’t make the laws he wants, he’ll go ahead and make them himself, and in the case of the employer mandate in his health care law, that’s exactly what he did. If this president can get away with making his own laws, future presidents will have the ability to as well. The House has an obligation to stand up for the Legislative Branch, and the Constitution, and that is exactly what we will do.”

The White House has dismissed the lawsuit as a “political stunt,” and Nancy Pelosi herself has described it as a “legal boondoggle doomed to fail.” Nonetheless, according to legal scholar Jonathan Turley, there’s a real possibility that this lawsuit is more than just political theatre (via The Daily Beast):

While Obama and his cheerleaders in the media sneer at the notion of executive overreach, noted constitutional scholar and George Washington Law School Professor Jonathan Turley believes Boehner’s suit could prevail. “I think there is a case against the president for exceeding his authority…I happen to agree with the president on many of his priorities and policies, but as I testified in Congress, I think that he has crossed the constitutional line,” Turley told MSNBC the day Boehner announced his suit.

“When the president went to Congress and said he would go it alone, it obviously raises a concern,” Turley added. “There’s no license for going it alone in our system, and what he’s done is very problematic. He has shifted $454 million of the ACA from appropriated purpose to another purpose. He’s told agencies not to enforce some laws, like immigration laws. He has effectively rewritten laws through the active interpretation that I find very problematic. While I happen to agree with him, I voted for him, I think this is a problem."

As do House Republicans. In any case, the House Rules Committee will deliberate and discuss a bill next Wednesday on whether or not to sue President Obama, according to the New York Times. Stay tuned.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: judgesandcourts; lawsuit

1 posted on 07/11/2014 6:29:05 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Another lawsuit that will be hung up in the courts for years.


2 posted on 07/11/2014 6:37:18 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Faced with the greatest crisis of his Speakership, Mr. Boehner is voting “present”.


3 posted on 07/11/2014 6:44:57 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Boehner really wants the employer mandate enforced?

Or is this another example of RINO Kabuki Theatre?

Just impeach the Bastard.

4 posted on 07/11/2014 6:48:35 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Boehner’s an idiot. I can’t wait until after the election and they pick someone else.


5 posted on 07/11/2014 6:50:47 PM PDT by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
Another appropriate time for the Jennifer Lawrence gif:
6 posted on 07/11/2014 6:51:18 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Boehner really wants the employer mandate enforced?

Don't we all?

How else to get a bad law repealed with widespread public support?

7 posted on 07/11/2014 7:04:11 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Fun stuff!: No judge or justice can support Obama.

The GOPe will then vote to use the retroactive funds from the mandate to bring in more immigrants...


8 posted on 07/11/2014 7:11:43 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

NO standing under the law in my opinion.
Find him a windmill and a lance and tape it on your phone for what it’s worth. Oh and don’t forget the horse and its as....
Never mind.


9 posted on 07/11/2014 7:20:51 PM PDT by glyptol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

With all that’s going on on the border and elsewhere and this is what he is going to sue over —

He is beyond hopeless


10 posted on 07/11/2014 7:22:31 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

?????


11 posted on 07/11/2014 7:23:34 PM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Nancy Pelosi described it as a “legal boondoggle doomed to fail.”

Uh oh. For once I agree with the stupidest member of Congress. Excuse me, I need to go have myself committed. I'll check in later.

12 posted on 07/11/2014 7:25:35 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glyptol

It’s the same as the impoundment suit congress won against Nixon. Open and shut.

Should have been filed immediately. Guess the GOPe could twist more businesses arms for donations by waiting though.


13 posted on 07/11/2014 7:28:30 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

More likely the suit will be tossed out within a month


14 posted on 07/11/2014 7:34:15 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Considering that most of the Judges that could make that decision will, most probably, be liberal ... you might be right.


15 posted on 07/11/2014 7:37:24 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In other news, today I bought a coffee. The Earth turned, the tide came in, then left.


16 posted on 07/11/2014 8:07:56 PM PDT by tinyowl (A equals A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t recall a case like this from either party. Apparently it is something new. And, as with most new political things, this will take forever to be adjudicated. Possibly beyond the end of nobama’s second term. Which really makes it kind of worthless. (I know Boehner said this would apply to future presidents as well.)

Also, what relief are they seeking? I seem to have missed that.


17 posted on 07/11/2014 8:09:29 PM PDT by upchuck (The country is being billed for its own execution. ~ h/t: SpaceBar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

House of Cowards


18 posted on 07/11/2014 8:21:40 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I must say that I love the irony of this.


19 posted on 07/11/2014 8:40:04 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
17 I don’t recall a case like this from either party. Apparently it is something new. And, as with most new political things, this will take forever to be adjudicated. ...

Newsmax 5/011/2014 Mark Levin Slams Boehner

Conservative commentator Mark Levin has slammed House Speaker John Boehner's plan to sue President Barack Obama for his alleged abuse of power, calling it a "very risky and foolish move."

Levin, who calls himself a constitutional lawyer, warned that Obama would likely win the court case, which would then embolden the president to go around Congress with more executive orders.

"I really do cringe at this idea that the elected branch of government turns to the unelected branch of government, and in essence empowers the other branch to make these decisions," he said on his Internet radio show. "That is not the way it is supposed to be. It troubles and worries me."

Levin said the federal courts often reject cases where the plaintiffs don't have any "standing," which he says is the case with Boehner's suit because Congress is a branch of government and not the House of Representatives alone.

"Even in a case where the full Congress, House and Senate, have brought a case, the courts have asked. Why are we involved in this? It's for you to duke it out, politically and electorally, with the executive branch.

"My problem is that it's an outlier argument — not the part whether the president is lawless; he is lawless. Let's say this case is quickly dismissed. Who will benefit from that? The House will be damaged by that in terms of the politics. But Obama cay say, 'Look at this, the courts agree with me.'

"It will embolden him and future presidents to violate the Constitution and to expand their illegitimate imperial power. This is playing with fire. I'm not kidding. ...

20 posted on 07/11/2014 10:17:59 PM PDT by MacNaughton (Poor Richard: ”Life's tragedy is that we get old too soon and wise too late.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Yes, I agree that it should have been filed immediately, but the House was not in GOP hands at the time and certainly Nancy Pelosi was not going to support it!

If Bambi is ordered to enforce the employer mandate, it will bring utter chaos and will mean the end of Obamacare. However, it will only do this if the GOP is smart enough to get control of the publicity narrative, something they seem to have trouble doing (at least in part because anything done by them appears on page 20 of a 19-page newspaper!!!).

Otherwise, Obama will announce that he was simply trying to protect American businesses by overriding this provision and imply that somehow the Republicans, not one of whom voted for Obamacare, are responsible for it in the first place.

The thing that I think might be helpful is that his latest stunt, immigration, has upset a lot of people because it is so visible and so hypocritical. There, he claims to be enforcing the law (about protecting children from human trafficking) but of course what he is doing is twisting it by having his agencies extend it to the point where it is rendered useless. Still, I think a lot of people see through this and if even one victory can be one against his illegal acts, it might be the beginning of the end for him.


21 posted on 07/12/2014 3:23:18 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MacNaughton

Thank you for that link and excerpt. I agree with Mark.


22 posted on 07/12/2014 1:41:16 PM PDT by upchuck (The country is being billed for its own execution. ~ h/t: SpaceBar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson