Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meet The Ilyushin IL-102, The Most Gorgeously Ugly Combat Jet Ever
Foxtrot Alpha ^ | 07/11/2014 | Tyler Rogoway

Posted on 07/11/2014 11:00:07 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

When we talk about combat aircraft that are so ugly they are brutishly beautiful, aircraft like the A-10, B-52 and the Mi-24 come to mind. Yet an obscure Russian close air support aircraft that lost a competition to the now notorious Sukhoi Su-25 may take the trophy for the must gorgeously ugly combat jet of all time.

By the late 1960s Russia was looking for a new jet aircraft that would be dedicated to close air support (CAS). After studying close air support scenarios and data collected since WWII it was clear that the fast, swept-wing jets and heavy bombers in inventory at the time could not get down low and slow enough to identify targets and attack them on multiple passes.

Even worse, they were all lightly armored and one well placed bullet or piece of shrapnel could turn them into a fiery wreck diving towards enemy held territory. From this study, requirements were put forward for an aircraft that had to be able to carry plentiful stores, had to be able to fly low to identify enemy targets, and it had to be able to take serious battle damage in the process.

A similar program known as the Attack Experimental (AX) was running at the Pentagon during this same time period, which would result in the YA-10 and YA-9 prototype aircraft. Strangely enough, the Northrop YA-9 would have large similarities to the Soviet designed SU-25. In the end, the Fairchild YA-10 won the US competition and the rest is 30mm spewing history.

Back to the Soviet competition, Ilyushin attacked the CAS/battlefield interdiction mission with a heavy hand and relied primarily on lessons learned from their famous Il-2 piston-powered attack aircraft of WWII vintage. In many ways Ilyushin had close air support and tactical ground attack in their ancestry more than any other Soviet aircraft design bureau. In fact, the whole dedicated close air support jet aircraft concept was already attempted by Ilyushin during the 1950s in the form of the extremely strange looking Il-40.

The Il-40 looked like a flying double-barreled shotgun, with its dual air intakes protruding far out on the front of the aircraft's fuselage. This strange design was due to issues with gas ingestion and subsequent jet engine flame-outs caused by the jet's planned six 23mm cannons. The design also featured some fairly heavy armored plating and like its famous Il-2 predecessor, a rear mounted machine gun on the jet's tail, with the gunner sitting at about the aircraft's trailing-edge wing root in a small cockpit enclosure. In the end, the Il-40 was cancelled due to changing organization within the Soviet Air Forces and the push for high-speed, swept wing jets for both attack and air-to-air combat duties.

Ilyushin stuck with the Il-2 and Il-40 general configuration with its new Il-102, but put more powerful engine technology to use and added much more armor and payload carrying capability. The Il-102 was truly a flying tank that housed a crew of two, a pilot upfront and a gunner in the rear. The gunner controlled the tail "stinger" twin-barreled 23mm gun assembly remotely.

The idea behind keeping the tailgun was that enemy fighters may have a hard time locking onto the low flying Il-102 due to ground clutter, so they would have to descend down to its level and would attempt a tail-shot on the unaware Il-102. Thus the gunner would keep the enemy fighters at bay by spraying 23mm cannon fire at them.

The whole tail-gunner idea was really a hold-over from WWII and would have had little use on the battlefield of the 1980s and beyond as all-aspect heat seeking missiles and pulse doppler radar sets would make any advantage gained by such an elaborate defensive setup very small. Still, the second crewman could do other things, especially when it comes to spotting targets and working the radios with friendly ground units.

The Il-102 could pack a serious offensive punch, with over 15,000lbs of munitions being able to be carried into battle. The jet had eight hardpoints for mounting rocket pods and missiles under its thick wings, and it also had six small bomb bays built into the wings themselves. These bays held individual munitions internally so that any performance drain they would cause on the aircraft would be a result of their weight alone, not drag. A 30mm cannon was also mounted externally on the centerline of the jet's belly. The GSh-30-2 cannon was capable of slinging depleted uranium penetrating rounds a about 2,400 rounds per minute.

When it came to armor, some say that Ilyushin went overboard with heavily armoring everything on the jet including its cockpit, engines, and subsystems using fairly rudimentary and dense plating. The fuel tanks were mounted in the dorsal section of the aircraft which protected them against ground fire as well. Although Sukhoi also took a armored approach with its Su-25, there was more of a willingness to trade kinematic performance for heavy armor plating in certain areas of their design, which helped in streamlining the whole package. The Il-102 was about 10,000 lbs heavier than the Su-25 and it used larger motors than its competitor, opting for a non-afterburning version of the MiG-29's thirsty RD-33 engines to move it along.

By the mid 1970s, proposals from Sukhoi, Mikoyan and Ilyushin were put forward, and Sukhoi's design was chosen as the winner. Some say this was due to the Su-25 winning on multiple perimeters, although they would have been highly theoretical as only the Su-25 prototype was near flying at the time and Mikoyan and Ilyushin's prototypes did not exist at all.

The fact that Sukhoi's actually had a prototype in the works may have been what caused the Su-25 to be chosen over its paper competitors, as the US had already chosen their new CAS aircraft, the A-10A Thunderbolt II. While others state the Il-102's heavier design and antiquated tailgun setup is what killed the tank buster to be. The IL-102 was said to have been cheaper to build, easier to maintain, and incredibly strong when it comes to the jet's structure, often with redundant load-bear structures throughout the aircraft's wings and fuselage.

Regardless of the fact that the Su-25 won the Soviet CAS aircraft requirement, Ilyushian continued with its IL-102 concept and the prototype was slowly assembled during the later half of the 1970s and early 1980s. Ilyushin was so convinced that their aircraft was superior for the the CAS mission, especially on cost, ruggedness and maintainability, that they continued with the project on internal funding and without a Soviet production contract. Supposedly Ilyushin thought there may be an export market for such a hard hitting, simple and robust CAS aircraft, even though the more nimble Su-25 was readily available.

The Il-102 finally flew in 1982, and continued flying some 367 test sorties, all of which were said to have been wildly successful, with Ilyushin test pilots giving the jet the highest marks possible. Then in 1984, the only flying prototype had an engine fire that would heavily damage the aircraft. The ground test prototype was said to have been too costly to have been converted to a flying example and the whole program was sadly abandoned.

Strangely enough, the Il-102 popped up again, albeit on the ground only this time, and with some theoretical upgrades, at the 1992 Moscow Air Show, and Sukhoi was actively pushing it as an export alternative to the Su-25. The jet was said to be capable of turning full circle in as little as 400 m, and had the same thrust to weight ratio and wing-loading as the smaller Su-25, all with cheaper acquisition and sustainment costs. The tailgun could be operated by the pilot in a semi automatic mode using a radar and the rear gunners station could be removed on production examples which would have saved well over 1,800 lbs.

Although the Il-102 had no shortage on character, it did have a shortage of firm orders and although there was interest in the aircraft in the early 1990s by foreign powers, the sorry state of Russia's aerospace industry ended up deterring any firm contracts from progressing. With that the Il-102 concept was finally put to rest.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; il02; il102; ussr

1 posted on 07/11/2014 11:00:07 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Got to admit, that rear facing gunner was seriously retro of them to think of........

Still cool, but the gunner wound not get to see all the good stuff happening up front!

2 posted on 07/11/2014 11:09:29 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Interesting article! I wasn’t familiar with this plane before.


3 posted on 07/11/2014 11:09:52 PM PDT by DemforBush (Whoever double-crosses me and leaves me alive, he understands nothing about Tuco.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

it has that “Made in Russia” look about it..


4 posted on 07/11/2014 11:10:21 PM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

He gets to shoot the harpoon and tow cable.


5 posted on 07/11/2014 11:12:04 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The Russians could have made good use of this aircraft in Afghanistan.


6 posted on 07/11/2014 11:14:27 PM PDT by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It DOES remind me of a jet-driven Sturmovik.
.


7 posted on 07/11/2014 11:23:22 PM PDT by tanuki (Left-wing Revolution: show biz for boring people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Yet an obscure Russian close air support aircraft that lost a competition to the now notorious Sukhoi Su-25 may take the trophy for the must gorgeously ugly combat jet of all time.

A couple of contenders...

Of course airplanes always look uglier parked on the ground.

8 posted on 07/11/2014 11:23:29 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

it has that “Made in Russia” look about it..


It certainly does. It looks like it would be tough to fly but take a beating.


9 posted on 07/11/2014 11:24:18 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

ME-109 and P-47???


10 posted on 07/11/2014 11:27:39 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

I spoke too soon. That’s not an ME-109.


11 posted on 07/11/2014 11:28:56 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: laplata

JU-87 Stuka and P47 Thunderbolt. Both great ground support planes and the P47 was also a fine high altitude fighter. But compared to planes like the P51 Mustang and Focke-Wulf 190 they were ugly as sin.


12 posted on 07/11/2014 11:34:22 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

That’s an ugly old Buffalo :-)


13 posted on 07/11/2014 11:35:36 PM PDT by Bobalu (Israel is the most long-suffering and peace loving nation on Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

I don’t think either of those is a combat “JET” though.

Russian aircraft always have an indefinable “something” that makes them seem odd somehow. Something in the design language is just “off”.


14 posted on 07/11/2014 11:42:57 PM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

You’re right, I missed the “jet” part.


15 posted on 07/11/2014 11:44:12 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Does NATO call it the.. “Homer Simpson”?...


16 posted on 07/11/2014 11:49:29 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Try this one:

http://kits.kitreview.com/images/fiatg50fmreviewbg_box.jpg


17 posted on 07/11/2014 11:49:52 PM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: razorbak

Or this:

http://ih0.redbubble.net/image.9918082.8539/flat,550x550,075,f.jpg


18 posted on 07/11/2014 11:52:07 PM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

I got the P-47 right. LOL One of Dad’s best friends was a P-47 Thunderbolt pilot.


19 posted on 07/11/2014 11:53:01 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: razorbak
Polikarpov Po-2 Russian WW2 Fighter
20 posted on 07/11/2014 11:59:24 PM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: razorbak
Italian Fiat G-50 -- WW2
21 posted on 07/12/2014 12:01:50 AM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
Those P47s don't look too bad in the air: On the ground vs... ...in the air:
22 posted on 07/12/2014 12:11:42 AM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Its a jet IL 2.. the il2 was the most produced combat plane ever..a ground attack aircraft..for Russian it is their iconic aircraft of World War 2..
23 posted on 07/12/2014 12:34:43 AM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorbak

Nice jugs.


24 posted on 07/12/2014 12:35:20 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

“He gets to shoot the harpoon and tow cable.”

Cable detached!

Loved the ‘Empire’ reference.


25 posted on 07/12/2014 1:21:04 AM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It looks a bit like an updated version of Germany’s ME-262 ...


26 posted on 07/12/2014 3:35:59 AM PDT by ByteMercenary (Healthcare Insurance is *NOT* a Constitutional right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

http://www.nebraskaaircrash.com/crashsites/daykin1.html

Seventy years ago today. Had occasion to use a prototype mapping metal detector to inspect the site where the P-47 went in to determine if the plane had been recovered, but was unsuccessful. Did find a piece of thick plexiglass among other parts.


27 posted on 07/12/2014 3:59:12 AM PDT by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

You slick devil...


28 posted on 07/12/2014 3:59:42 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
There are some aircraft that don't fly because of Bernoulli's Principle. Some aircraft are actually so ugly that the ground repels them — such as the Ilyushin Il-102.
29 posted on 07/12/2014 4:33:56 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorbak

Looks like a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polikarpov_I-16

modelled like various others after the Gee Bee racer...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gee_Bee_R-1

The I-16 came to have a Wright powerplant.


30 posted on 07/12/2014 5:05:59 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: razorbak

I’m html-retarded, so I’m not posting a picture, but that sucker looks almost as goofy as a GeeBee, which has to be right up there in competition for ugliest plane going (jet or prop category): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gee_Bee_Model_R


31 posted on 07/12/2014 5:19:59 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Argghhh - you’re posting while I’m chasing down the reference!!


32 posted on 07/12/2014 5:21:20 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

BOOKMARK


33 posted on 07/12/2014 5:22:00 AM PDT by DFG ("Dumb, Dependent, and Democrat is no way to go through life" - Louie Gohmert (R-TX))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
OMG, I want one to go with my Enfield Motorcycle and Bren Gun Carrier!

If the USAF hot jocks hated the A-10, imagine the paroxysms of disgust they would feel about this useful beast! Is there a belly gunner ball turret option?

Imagine low-cost, highly effective, easy-to-maintain combat aircraft for close support. These Iluyshin people must be crushed before they upset the entire international arms market. What next, Kamev Helicopters?

34 posted on 07/12/2014 5:22:51 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (The GOP is dying. What do we do now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanuki

That was my first thought too. That was a beast.


35 posted on 07/12/2014 5:23:11 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thank you for the cool article FRiend, and for the neat site with so many other good links. Will def send it on to aviation loving son ;)

Tatt


36 posted on 07/12/2014 5:35:28 AM PDT by thesearethetimes... (Had I brought Christ with me, the outcome would have been different. Dr.Eric Cunningham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorbak

I never thought Jugs were ugly either. All curves, but a bit beefy - like an Amish farm girl. Built to last.


37 posted on 07/12/2014 5:35:49 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
That is a 2/3 or 3/4 scale flying replica of a Stuka. Real ones are a tad bigger.

Here is my favorite Stuka, the Ju-87G-2. Under each wing is a 37mm anti-tank gun. It was the functional predecessor of the A-10.


38 posted on 07/12/2014 5:40:33 AM PDT by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stosh
Happy to post aero porn...

Use:
<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d0/Gee_Bee_R-1.jpg/1024px-Gee_Bee_R-1.jpg" width="100%">

To get:

Freedom ≠ Free Stuff☭
I, for one, welcome our new Cybernetic Overlords /.
Mash Dobbshead® for HTML, bop Hello_Cthlhu for XAMPP

39 posted on 07/12/2014 5:43:57 AM PDT by Mycroft Holmes (The fool is always greater than the proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Here is what the Il-102 was derived from, the Il-40 (NATO name 'Brawny'):

The ugly nut doesn't fall far from the ugly tree.

40 posted on 07/12/2014 5:45:18 AM PDT by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mycroft Holmes

Beautiful - thanks for the pic (and the free lesson!)


41 posted on 07/12/2014 5:45:48 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Stosh
The trick is finding the image isolated from everything else. That one was through a couple of layers of indirection. First Wikipedia, then click the link which goes to a photo gallery, then right click over the image and Open Image in New Tab to get the naked image only. The URL was a little odd too, you don't usually see .jpg as part of a directory name. Appears to work though.
42 posted on 07/12/2014 6:39:14 AM PDT by Mycroft Holmes (The fool is always greater than the proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Yeah, that caught my eye too. What the heck though, are they going to mount an 12.7mm out of it? This isn’t WW2. A heat seeking missile can shoot this thing out of the sky from ten miles out. No machine gun is going to do you any good.


43 posted on 07/12/2014 7:44:33 AM PDT by jmacusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Yeah, it does. Something like what NASA engineers used to call ‘’water heater technology’’. Parts of various stuff kinda cobbled and banged together with pop rivets, screws, chewing gum or whatever and painted with that sickly pea green color. “Hey Yuri fly airplane, is good’’.


44 posted on 07/12/2014 7:46:58 AM PDT by jmacusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

I think this is a scale reduction built in the last 20 years, rather than a full size replica. There is a full size & authentic Stuka hanging from the ceiling of the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry. It has been there since the 1950s. along with a Battle of Britain Spitfire.


45 posted on 07/12/2014 8:39:37 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Right after Desert Storm, when Barksdale still had a bunch of A-10s, the pilots we knew loved the Wart Hog.

One of our neighbors was in on the “Road of Death shoot em up” during the escape from Kuwait, he said it was the most fun he ever had.


46 posted on 07/12/2014 8:42:38 AM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Code name "Fugly"?
47 posted on 07/12/2014 8:42:45 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson