Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHO warns HIV 'exploding' among gay men, urges preventive drugs
AFP ^ | 11 July 14 | Diptendu Dutta

Posted on 07/14/2014 6:05:55 AM PDT by SkyPilot

HIV infections are rising among gay men in many parts of the world, the World Health Organization warned Friday, urging all men who have sex with men to take antiretroviral drugs to prevent infection.

"We are seeing exploding epidemics," warned Gottfried Hirnschall, who heads WHO's HIV department.

Infection rates are rising again among men who have sex with men -- the group at the epicentre of AIDS pandemic when it first emerged 33 years ago, he told reporters in Geneva.

While images of skeletal men dying of AIDS in the 1980s pushed the world to act, a younger generation that has grown up among new treatments that make it possible to live with HIV are less focused on the disease, he suggested.

Today, this group is 19 times more likely than the general population to be infected by HIV, Hirnschall said.

In Bangkok for instance, the incidence of HIV among men who have sex with men stands at 5.7 percent, compared to less than 1.0 percent for the overall population, he said.

n its new recommendations for combatting the HIV/AIDS pandemic, published Friday, the UN health agency therefore for the first time "strongly recommends men who have sex with men consider taking antiretroviral medicines as an additional method of preventing HIV infection".

US authorities made the same recommendation in May.

Taking pre-exposure prophylaxis medication, for instance as a single daily pill combining two antiretrovirals, in addition to using condoms, has been estimated to cut HIV incidence among such men by 20-25 percent, WHO said, stressing that this could avert "up to one million new infections among this group over 10 years".

The new guidelines also focus on other high-risk groups, pointing out that men who have sex with men, transgender people, prisoners, people who inject drugs...

(Excerpt) Read more at afp.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aids; antiretrovirals; gay; hiv; homosexual; homosexualagenda; lgbt; obamacaredrugs; prevention

In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

Romans 1:17

1 posted on 07/14/2014 6:05:55 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Amen! Pack the piper pay the price. No worries about trans placenta transmission.


2 posted on 07/14/2014 6:11:21 AM PDT by mcshot (..."And this too shall pass.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Romans has it exactly correct. They receive due penalty for their error. Unfortunately, this always permeates outwards.


3 posted on 07/14/2014 6:12:05 AM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

HIV exploding among gay men. Sarge - Gollly!

4 posted on 07/14/2014 6:12:38 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

“take antiretroviral drugs to prevent infection. “

That won’t prevent infection.


5 posted on 07/14/2014 6:14:49 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Which makes you question why the gummit is actively promoting this activity? Heterosexual men have no chance of catching HIV so how do they come up with 19%?

Pray America wakes up


6 posted on 07/14/2014 6:19:57 AM PDT by bray (Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

“Preventive drugs”???

How about quit sticking your penises into each others’ rectums?

Hmmmmm?

Maybe?

Ya think that might minimize the problem?


7 posted on 07/14/2014 6:21:45 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
"for instance as a single daily pill combining two antiretrovirals, in addition to using condoms, has been estimated to cut HIV incidence among such men by 20-25 percent,"

Those are still pretty lousy odds given the stakes. (by the way, the Bible verse you quote in your post is Romans 1:27 not 1:17)

8 posted on 07/14/2014 6:22:37 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

And naturally, an admonition to avoid promiscuous anal intercourse is nowhere on the list of recommendations.


9 posted on 07/14/2014 6:24:01 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Presidential Tail
10 posted on 07/14/2014 6:24:13 AM PDT by Fear The People (When the government fears the people, you have LIBERTY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Good now lets see you filthy creeps push your disgusting life style in our face..maybe we will one day be rid of your filthy asses..

Your number one fan OBAMA will one day get his too..I wonder how many men besides Reggie the Muslim shags..


11 posted on 07/14/2014 6:24:21 AM PDT by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

As if the safe sex heterosexuals are expected to practice for fear of disease and pregnancy are impossible for homosexuals, who only have to worry about disease. Solution instead is 10K per year drug cocktails to which the disease will evolve resistance due to evolution faster because no one takes that many pills consistently if their lives don’t seem to depend on it. We can base that on the half of TB sufferers who complete their course in full, and they HAVE a potentially fatal disease.


12 posted on 07/14/2014 6:27:51 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
WHO warns HIV 'exploding' among gay men, urges preventive drugs...

Like Trinoassitol?

13 posted on 07/14/2014 6:30:05 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Is that letter real? So Obama’s claim for support of traditional marriage in 2008 is a verifiable lie?


14 posted on 07/14/2014 6:35:43 AM PDT by Fido969 (What's sad is most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Lepers are placed in colonies, TB patients are confined in isolated institutions, maybe non-celibate homosexuals (if there is such a thing) should be removed from society and placed in colonies as well - for the sake of the whole.


15 posted on 07/14/2014 6:56:26 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

We don’t need preventative drugs. What we need is to find a way to speed up the course of the infection. If we reduced the time from infection to death to 30 days, HIV/AIDS will become a thing of the past. Keeping infected people alive allows them to spread the virus which is leading to the “exploding” of the virus among homosexual men.


16 posted on 07/14/2014 6:56:43 AM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel (Have a wonderful day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
What is amazing about HIV/AIDS is the truth got buried under an avalanch of politically correct lies.

We were told in the 1980s the truth: HIV was hard to catch, you could not catch it from a sneeze, a handshake, or a mosquito.

Discover Magazine in 1985 told the truth: HIV transmission and infection was prevalent in the gay male community largely due to a specific risky homosexual behavior (anal sex), and while possible, it was hard to transmit from a male to a female in vaginal sex. Similarly, it was almost impossible to transmit from female to male via vaginal sex.

So the heterosexuals discounted HIV/AIDS as a "gay disease". But the politically correct police decided heterosexuals "must be made to care", so they declared it a "sexually transmitted disease", not a "gay disease", and highlighted heterosexual transmission, with no consideration of the specific behaviors which may have transmitted it. They lumped in transsexual females into the female category to raise the number of "females" who were infected by "heterosexual sex". They refused to drill down into possible IV drug use among infected heterosexuals, or high risk sexual behavior, especially given changing sexual morals over the generations. They focused on statistics from Africa, where ignorance and other factors raised the risk of heterosexual transmission. And they then took those statistics and told us they applied to the general, first-world heterosexual population.

They promoted the "Get Tested" campaign, which was propaganda to scare the heterosexual community. Moochelle pushed this propaganda as the "responsible thing to do."

Back in 2005 Discover Magazine rescinded and apologized for its 1985 article, never mind that no fact stated in the 1985 article was untrue. Discover's 2005 point was there was significant HIV infection among heterosexual women in Africa. And therefore, political correctness had to rule.

I also just read a Facebook post that viral researchers are trying to blame HIV's "discrimination" on different strains of the virus. Really. They are really blaming the difference on the theory of a homophobic single-cell organism.

Also, never mind the obvious control group: lesbians. If HIV/AIDS is just another sexually transmitted disease, like herpes, and can be transmitted by infected females to their partners (a key necessity in for the heterosexual AIDS myth to be accepted) why is there not much infection in the lesbian community? Why are they not encouraging lesbians to "get tested"?

Now we see stats showing such severe infection rates among homosexual men and transsexual women (i.e., homosexual men), to the point a special exception must be made for them, and expensive preemptive retroviral drugs given to them.

The contradiction is writ large: If we are all at risk, and all should get regular testing, why are the retroviral drugs only recommended for homosexual men?

The politically correct should not be able to have it both ways. HIV/AIDS cannot be a universal disease we are all at risk of catching, and a disease which dominantly infects gay males, unless considering how the disease is transmitted (i.e., behavior). But they are trying to have it both ways. Homophobic viral strains are attacking gay males, so we must provide them free retroviral drugs, and not dare suggest they modify their behavior--in fact, the whole "safe sex" thing is not spoken about nearly as much.

This whole affair is like the propaganda in a totalitarian county. To me, the truth screams through. To the liberal and politically correct, they simply cannot see the truth.

And the truth is, preemptive retroviral drugs (paid for by Obamacare), any sex will be seen as "safe", and the epidemic will continue, and grow.

"Truth isn't mean, it's truth." - Andrew Breitbart

17 posted on 07/14/2014 7:15:09 AM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

And THESE are the people who want to start contaminating the blood supply again!


18 posted on 07/14/2014 7:15:25 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need more than seven rounds, Much more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

And according to the title, AIDS has reached the level that Eddie Murphy referred to -

“what’s next? I guess you just put your -> in and explode!”


19 posted on 07/14/2014 7:17:16 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
And THESE are the people who want to start contaminating the blood supply again!

Does anyone else recall a TV interview back in the 80s of a homosexual who said that they were going to deliberately contaminate the blood supply, because funding AIDS research would only be increased if it was a threat to everyone?

20 posted on 07/14/2014 7:23:30 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

duh!

who didn’t think drugs that dont cure the disease, but only mask the symptoms and extend life wouldn’t result in a higher AIDS infection percentage!


21 posted on 07/14/2014 7:24:49 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
I should have sympathy for people with deadly diseases, but it's difficult for me to work up tears for a segment of the population that refuses to accept responsibility for their actions or take proper steps to avoid disease. The cause of HIV infection was known in the early '80s (unprotected anal sex) and that infection could be halted by using condoms. The homos were enraged at the idea that they were responsible for their plight and proceeded to blame Reagan because he didn't find a cure overnight.

Then the general public was subjected to a barrage of pro-homosexual messages, plays, and movies concerning the subject. The media outright lied to the public that everybody was equally liable to contracting the disease when they knew full well that if you weren't a male homosexual engaging in unsafe buggering practices or a dirty-needle junkie, the odds of contracting the disease were tiny. Even though some people (Arthur Ashe) were infected by HIV-tainted blood tranfusions and died, the risk for non-male homos was exceedling small.

So since then I weep few tears for these people. They spread a disease that managed to kill hundreds or thousands of innocent people who did not engage in unsafe sex practices, and they blamed other people (Reagan, conservatives) because they didn't find a cure overnight allowing them to keep engaging in unsafe buggering. Even now many of them still practice unsafe sex and keep getting infected. They made their bed, they can lay in it.

22 posted on 07/14/2014 7:31:19 AM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Anyone notice that even with the condoms and anti-viral the risk is only lessened by 20-25%?

I wonder what it would be reduced with just condoms.


23 posted on 07/14/2014 7:32:30 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

“Like Trinoassitol?”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Or Nopokabunghol. I have heard of a new repellent spray called “Deepwoods Bruceoff” that is said to work well. A strict policy of Don’t Love Reggie should also help.


24 posted on 07/14/2014 7:36:25 AM PDT by RipSawyer (OPM is the religion of the sheeple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

25 posted on 07/14/2014 7:38:59 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot; wagglebee

Here’s an oldie but a goodie.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/718886/posts

The WHO says HIV is exploding among gays, but the gays want to give blood transfusions. The 2002 link is about infections gotten from tainted blood!

Read and Remember


26 posted on 07/14/2014 8:05:21 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Here is a thread from just last week about them wanting to give blood:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3178966/posts


27 posted on 07/14/2014 8:09:42 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Meanwhile, back at the hospital...

Universities to host ‘National Gay Blood Drive’ (Free at Last- Free at Last)
Campus Reform ^ | 7-11-2014 | K
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3180021/posts?page=1


28 posted on 07/14/2014 8:26:52 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

The proven way to stop these coprophiliacs is to slam them back into the closet or pass laws banning the behavior.


29 posted on 07/14/2014 8:29:16 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I remember that, and was getting ready to mention it. You beat me to it.

Now they want to contaminate the blood supply again as Bill Clinton did when he allowed AIDS infected prisoners in Arkansas to donate blood.
Quite a few people died as a result.


30 posted on 07/14/2014 8:50:36 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need more than seven rounds, Much more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

BTTT................


31 posted on 07/14/2014 9:04:09 AM PDT by Red Badger (I've posted a total of 2,763 threads and 85,286 replies. ...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

The wages of sin are death.


32 posted on 07/14/2014 10:04:49 AM PDT by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I file reports like this in the same “I Don’t Care” category as I do muslims-killing-muslims or commies-killing-commies.


33 posted on 07/14/2014 10:34:32 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

That is unexpected. Who could have guessed that pretending it was morally and socially okay for men to have sex with men would dramatically increase the transmission of a disease spread when men have sex with men?


34 posted on 07/14/2014 11:29:22 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson