Skip to comments.Kerry to hold 2nd day of talks with Iran over nuclear deal
Posted on 07/14/2014 9:18:31 AM PDT by Dave346
With just 6 days left to a July 20 deadline, US secretary of state makes a push to overcome major differences in negotiations
US Secretary of State John Kerry was due Monday to hold a second day of talks with Iran seeking to overcome major differences blocking what would be a momentous nuclear deal.
With just six days until a deadline to strike an accord, the differences appear considerable, however, with Kerry and other Western ministers failing on Sunday to achieve a breakthrough.
Such an accord is aimed at ending once and for all worries that Iran might develop nuclear weapons under the guise of its civilian programme, and silence talk of war.
Iran denies seeking the bomb and wants the lifting of all UN and Western sanctions, which have caused it major economic problems.
The five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany have been negotiating almost constantly for months, but the talks have come up against major problems as expected.
Kerry and the foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany arrived Sunday in Vienna seeking to press Iran to make key concessions.
The three European ministers however left late in the day saying no breakthrough had been made, although Kerry remained for likely further discussions with his Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif on Monday.
Russia and China sent only lower-ranking officials, with Chinese Deputy Foreign Minister Li Baodong urging both sides to show flexibility.
Kerry said on arrival that very significant gaps remained, while Iranian negotiator Abbas Araqchi said that on all the important issues, no narrowing of positions was evident.
Germanys Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who like the others held one-on-one talks with Zarif, was the most downbeat, warning that the ball is in Irans court.
It is now up to Iran to decide to take the path of cooperation . I hope that the days left will be enough to create some reflection in Tehran, he said.
Britains Foreign Secretary William Hague said that no decisive breakthrough was achieved and that there remained a huge gap on the key issue of uranium enrichment.
This activity can produce fuel for the countrys sole nuclear plant or, if further enriched, the matter for an atomic bomb.
The six powers want Iran to reduce dramatically the scope of its enrichment programme, while Tehran wants to expand it.
Israel, the Middle Easts sole if undeclared nuclear weapons state and which together with Washington has refused to rule out military action, is opposed to any enrichment by Iran.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Sunday that any nuclear deal leaving Iran with the capability to pursue this activity would be catastrophic.
It would be a disaster for the United States and for everyone else, he told Fox News, adding that a bad deal is actually worse than no deal.
Araqchi said: Concerning enrichment, our position is clear and rational. As the supreme guide said, the enrichment programme has been planned with the real needs of the country in mind, meaning our need to ensure reactor fuel.
On Saturday, Araqchi said Iran was ready to walk away from the talks if the world powers pushed on with excessive demands.
If no agreement is reached by next Sunday when a six-month interim accord with Iran runs out, both sides can decide to extend the pact for longer and keep talking.
French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said that if a deal was not struck, we either extend, a so-called rollover, or we will have to say that unfortunately there is no perspective for a deal.
But such an extension is possible only if both sides agree, and the United States in particular is opposed to such a move unless Tehran first offers major concessions.
Hague said Sunday that such a move will only be discussed if no progress can be made. It is still too early.
Why the long face?
This is a charade. The Iranians will get everything they want. The US and the West will get a worthless set of assurances that amount to jack squat.
Everyone (but Israel) will feign surprise and shock when Iran detonates its first nuclear weapon.
Hope he doesn’t get a paper cut.
Is he going to play his guitar for them?
The DIP-lomats probably want an “extension” because that assures them of yet more expensive catered meals, parties, classy accommodations and more at the taxpayers’ expense. What’s not to like? The trough has many iterations.
I can hear it from here.
Yeah, they were raping children and killing babies...
I was going to comment on Kerry’s inability to form a cogent sentence, much less make an advantageous deal, but you said it better.
John Kerry, the Rodney Dangerfield of the diplomatic community.
English as a second language.
American Patriots Against John Kerry
The 1970 meeting that John Kerry conducted with North Vietnamese communists violated U.S. law, according to an author and researcher who has studied the issue.
Kerry met with representatives from both delegations (North Vietnamese and Viet Cong) of the Vietnamese in Paris in 1970, according to Kerrys own testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22, 1971. But Kerrys meetings with the Vietnamese delegations were in direct violation of laws forbidding private citizens from negotiating with foreign powers, according to researcher and author Jerry Corsi, who began studying the anti-war movement in the early 1970s.
According to Corsi, Kerry violated U.S. code 18 U.S.C. 953. A U.S. citizen cannot go abroad and negotiate with a foreign power, Corsi told CNSNews.com.
By Kerrys own admission, he met in 1970 with delegations from the North Vietnamese communist government and discussed how the Vietnam Warshould be stopped.
Iran wants nukes. Decent people don’t want Iran to have nukes. The only reason we are negotiating is to present the appearance that something is being done - to give Iran more time to complete their nuclear weapons program.
“John Kerry” and “UN Deadline” - Two entities of equal incompetence, irrelevance, and uselessness...