Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Net-Neutrality Push, Democrats Aim to Make the Internet a Utility
Nextgov ^ | July 14, 2014 | Brendan Sasso

Posted on 07/14/2014 1:48:01 PM PDT by abb

Several liberal lawmakers want to apply utility-style regulations to Internet service providers.

Sen. Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, collected signatures for a letter urging the Federal Communications Commission to regulate the Internet like the telephone system.

Democratic Sens. Chuck Schumer of New York and Al Franken of Minnesota, as well as independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, have signed on, aides confirmed. The lawmakers have planned a Tuesday morning press conference with Internet advocacy groups.

In the letter, the senators argue that stronger authority is necessary to enact strong net-neutrality rules to prevent broadband providers such as Comcast from manipulating Internet traffic to favor giant corporations.

"Broadband is a more advanced technology than phone service, but in the 21st century, it performs the same essential function," the senators write in a draft of the letter.

"Consumers and businesses cannot live without this vital connection to each other and to the world around them. Accordingly, it would be appropriate for the FCC to reclassify broadband to reflect the vital role the Internet plays in carrying our most important information and our greatest ideas."

Because of a decision during the Bush administration, the FCC currently regulates broadband Internet as an "information service" under Title I of the Communications Act. Reclassifying broadband as a "telecommunications service" under Title II of the law would immediately give the agency sweeping new powers.

The FCC enacted net-neutrality rules in 2010 under the weaker legal authority, but a federal court struck them down earlier this year. The FCC is trying to rework the rules in a way that can survive future court challenges, but the proposal from Chairman Tom Wheeler has prompted a massive public backlash because it would allow Internet providers to charge websites for special "fast lanes" as long as the agreements are "commercially reasonable."

In their letter, the liberal senators warn that Wheeler's proposal "could fundamentally alter the Internet as we know it."

The only way to enact effective net-neutrality rules that bar online discrimination is to use the agency's power under Title II, the senators write.

Although Democrats have long supported net neutrality, few have explicitly called for the FCC to reclassify the Internet under Title II. Thirty-seven House members of the Progressive Caucus signed a letter supporting Title II in May, but 20 Democrats signed a dueling letter opposing the option.

Republicans and major broadband providers have threatened a legal and political war with the FCC if it tries to reclassify the Internet.

Top Senate Republicans sent a letter to Wheeler in May, warning that "monopoly-era Title II regulations" would stifle investment and undermine his "ability to effectively lead the FCC." House Republican leaders fired off a similar letter the following day.

In a blog post Monday, the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, the lobbying group that represents Comcast and other broadband providers, urged the FCC to reject the "extreme voices" calling for reclassification.

Utility-style "common carrier" regulations would "deter ongoing investments and innovation" and would not even survive in court, the cable group warned.

Under Title II, the FCC has broad regulatory powers, including the ability to control prices and determine which customers a company has to serve. But the commission can also decide to waive any requirements under the provision.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: broadband; internet; netneutrality; utility
The bastards never sleep...
1 posted on 07/14/2014 1:48:01 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb

Freaking communist bastards.


2 posted on 07/14/2014 1:50:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

“Build it, and they will come.”


3 posted on 07/14/2014 1:51:15 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
And there will be a subnet culture with backdoors to the WWW. Or an alternative
out of the Country of which nobody will be able to control.

With every push for Socialism aka Communism there will be a push back.
I dare any of the statists to bring that out to the House for a vote.

4 posted on 07/14/2014 1:53:57 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
IOW,, YOU PEONS HAVE TO MUCH FREEDOM AND MUST BE CONTROLLED!
And oh btw, Vote for me and give me the power to F-you at every turn..
5 posted on 07/14/2014 1:55:10 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Build it, and some fascist will try to control it.


6 posted on 07/14/2014 1:55:16 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

There’s no control like total control...


7 posted on 07/14/2014 1:57:54 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

network protocols are 100% analogous to two people talking, passing information between them

when you click a link, you are essentially asking for a file from someone else... who asks someone else on your behalf... who asks someone else... who returns the requested file back down the line.

how we choose to communicate is 100% a 1st amendment issue

the actual electricity doing the transfer would be analogous to the roads... and lends itself more readily to being called a utility


8 posted on 07/14/2014 1:58:54 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
Consumers and businesses cannot live without this vital connection to each other and to the world around them.

And yet, they were able to do just that for centuries before the internet was created.

-PJ

9 posted on 07/14/2014 2:00:31 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

It’s a 100% sure-fire winner with Millenials.

Look for Pubbies to hop on board as the train is leaving the station.


10 posted on 07/14/2014 2:06:40 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Consumers and businesses cannot live without this vital connection to each other and to the world around them.

I agree, so we need to make sure the government stays out of it so they won't break the internet, too. They have done just fine without the government.

11 posted on 07/14/2014 2:12:10 PM PDT by RatRipper (No need to rob others; democRATS will steal and share a tiny bit with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: abb

There is NOTHING that liberals don’t want to control.


12 posted on 07/14/2014 2:13:31 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Anyone remember how to set up a BBS? Packet radio?

Breaker breaker!!

KYPD


13 posted on 07/14/2014 2:13:35 PM PDT by petro45acp (It's a fabian thing.....how do you boil a frog? How's that water feelin right about now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

If Schumer and Franken are FOR it, then not only is it a bad idea it will almost certainly turn out to be a criminal enterprise.


14 posted on 07/14/2014 2:21:42 PM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
That's what I was implying. It's a lot easier for government to reap the benefits of private enterprise by coming in and directing it than to build it themselves. Unless I've been misinformed, net neutrality could be the 21st century equivalent of the 1990's CLEC frenzy.

The CLECs were the "co-located exchange operators", who under the Telecommunications Act, were given access to the operating companies switch fabric. That gave them a cheap in to telecommunications--and they proceeded to compete with the incumbent carriers using the carriers' infrastructure. It was a very exciting time for their stocks, until most of them went bankrupt.

15 posted on 07/14/2014 2:25:51 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb

Any new technology gets about 20 years of untrammeled growth, before progressives and nanny-staters get their hands on it - and begin passing laws on licensing, taxes, access, content, etc.. The time frame is probably relatively shorter now because the Government is already so large and intrusive.

oil, electricity, autos, airplanes, television - and now the internet.


16 posted on 07/14/2014 2:32:03 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

The Internet is conservative’s last stand. He tried to give it away now this.

If they ever get it we really are done.


17 posted on 07/14/2014 3:09:13 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

The pubbies in the house need pass a bill real soon that prevents the FCC from doing this.

Then hope they win the Senate so it can be passed there. nobama would likely veto, but at least the intent would have been made.


18 posted on 07/14/2014 3:29:53 PM PDT by upchuck (The country is being billed for its own execution. ~ h/t: SpaceBar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

I know why don’t they do obamanet...if you get food stamps and section 8 housing, then you get free internet.

Off shoot of Obama phones ya know...

Writing is on the wall...internet subsidies for the poor


19 posted on 07/14/2014 4:27:07 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson