Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thousands of drug offenders could see sentences shortened
The Hill ^ | July 18 2014 | Benjamin Goad

Posted on 07/18/2014 1:19:47 PM PDT by PoloSec

The U.S. Sentencing Commission voted Friday to retroactively apply reduced sentencing guidelines for certain drug offenders, an action that could mean shortened sentences for tens of thousands of inmates.

If not overturned by Congress, inmates would not be eligible for reduced sentences until November of next year, to ensure judges are given enough time to make case-by-case decisions about releasing inmates early.

The move won immediate praise from the Obama administration, congressional Democrats and left-leaning think tanks who say the move would promote fairness in the criminal justice system, while addressing capacity problems at prisons around the country.

“At my direction, the Bureau of Prisons will begin notifying federal inmates of the opportunity to apply for a reduction in sentence immediately,” Attorney Gen. Eric Holder said. “This is a milestone in the effort to make more efficient use of our law enforcement resources and to ease the burden on our overcrowded prison system.”

Friday’s vote follows an April decision to shorten sentencing guidelines for most drug offenders going forward. Congress has until November of this year to disapprove that amendment.

In the absence of action, courts could begin considering petitions from prisoners for sentence reductions this November, but no prisoners could be released before Nov. 1, 2015.

“The delay will help to protect public safety by enabling appropriate consideration of individual petitions by judges, ensuring effective supervision of offenders upon release, and allowing for effective reentry plans,” said Judge Patti B. Saris, the commission’s chairwoman.

If the decision stands, an estimated 46,290 offenders would be eligible to seek shortened sentences.

Those approved would see an average of 25 months shaved off their sentences, ultimately resulting in the saving of near 80,000 “bed years,” the equivalent of one federal prisoner occupying a prison bed for a year.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: wod

1 posted on 07/18/2014 1:19:47 PM PDT by PoloSec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

“The move won immediate praise from the Obama administration, congressional Democrats and left-leaning think tanks who say the move would promote fairness in the criminal justice system, while addressing capacity problems at prisons around the country.”

Translation into truth: The move won praise from [liberals] who say that we should release a bunch of angry people with criminal proclivities to beg for welfare checks and commit more crimes in the name of “fairness” and “saving money”. They say it will advance their goals of destroying America and replacing it with a USSR/caliphate government.


2 posted on 07/18/2014 1:28:41 PM PDT by Objective Scrutator (All liberals are criminals, and all criminals are liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

As long as they are replaced by every illegal gang member and gang members in general ..

Especially, MS-13 and the Mejicano strains.

Straight from the border to the hoosegow..

Or let ‘em swim with Orcas.


3 posted on 07/18/2014 1:33:41 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
for certain drug offenders

A real reporter would tell us what kind of drug offenders we are talking about here.

4 posted on 07/18/2014 1:41:54 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

The ‘RATS are trying to get them all out of the Iron Bar Motel before the “elections”. The ‘RATS know they are in deep kimchi and need all of the votes they can get.


5 posted on 07/18/2014 1:44:23 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

As long as their offense doesn’t involve violence or theft, I see no problem.


6 posted on 07/18/2014 1:50:57 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

RAND PAUL!!! RAND PAUL!!!

More FELONS about to hit the street to TERRORIZE people!!! I sure hope you’re PROUD of yourself.


7 posted on 07/18/2014 1:51:43 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
"Non-violent drug offenders", says the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
8 posted on 07/18/2014 3:41:28 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson