Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fla. jury slams RJ Reynolds with $23.6B in damages (no, that was not a typo)
AP ^ | 7/19/2014 | JENNIFER KAY

Posted on 07/19/2014 2:06:55 PM PDT by markomalley

A Florida jury has slammed the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. with $23.6 billion in punitive damages in a lawsuit filed by the widow of a longtime smoker who died of lung cancer in 1996.

The case is one of thousands filed in Florida after the state Supreme Court in 2006 tossed out a $145 billion class action verdict. That ruling also said smokers and their families need only prove addiction and that smoking caused their illnesses or deaths.

Last year, Florida's highest court re-approved that decision, which made it easier for sick smokers or their survivors to pursue lawsuits against tobacco companies without having to prove to the court again that Big Tobacco knowingly sold dangerous products and hid the hazards of cigarette smoking.

The damages a Pensacola jury awarded Friday to Cynthia Robinson after a four-week trial come in addition to $16.8 million in compensatory damages.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: anticapitalist; lawsuit; pufflist; smokingnazis; tobacco; tobacconazis; tortreform; triallawyers; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2014 2:06:55 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley
I bet someone on the jury wanted to make them pay $23.6 trillion, but the foreman said, "Why make them pay trillions, when we can make them pay billions?"
2 posted on 07/19/2014 2:12:43 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Harvey Dent, can we trust him?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBsdV--kLoQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Does the company even have any where close to that amount??


3 posted on 07/19/2014 2:13:30 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Frito: “How many billions?”
Joe: “Like, 10.”
Frito: “Yeah, suck one. Time machine costs, like, 20.”
Joe: “Yeah? Okay. Uh, 30, Frito. Thirty billion dollars.”
Frito: “Thirty billion. So if you gave me 30 billion and the time machine’s 20— What’s the minus of 30 and 20?”
Joe: “Uh, it’s, uh, it’s 80, Frito. It’s eighty billion dollars. That’s a mighty big minus, isn’t it?”
Frito: “Yeah. I like money though.”


4 posted on 07/19/2014 2:14:42 PM PDT by Azeem (There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Ridiculous and pure political BS! This is a shakedown of an industry because the government wants it to happen. Addiction is far too broad a standard because of all the areas it can cover. Will all diabetics sue candy manufacturers? Just another example of ignoring personal responsibility and because a few do so, the government has to step in and save the rest of us through regulation. WWII was won on the backs of nicotine and caffeine so what’s in store for the future? Energy drinks?


5 posted on 07/19/2014 2:15:08 PM PDT by Boomer One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Her husband died due to his own bad decisions.


6 posted on 07/19/2014 2:16:24 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer One

“WWII was won on the backs of nicotine and caffeine”

And meth.


7 posted on 07/19/2014 2:18:21 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Pay $1 a year.


8 posted on 07/19/2014 2:19:43 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Diabertes is caused by carbs. Not only sugar but also potatos and rice. Bad choices are not grounds for liability.


9 posted on 07/19/2014 2:21:56 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Even I don’t agree with this. Still it’s funny.


10 posted on 07/19/2014 2:24:22 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

If you’re product is politically unpopular other peoples choices apparently are grounds.


11 posted on 07/19/2014 2:24:38 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

“Her husband died due to his own bad decisions.


I agree-—and I smoke.

It’s just another deep pockets lawsuit.

.


12 posted on 07/19/2014 2:26:23 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Certain to be reduced by a significant amount upon appeal. I wish they’d give out $1 judgments just so the lawyers can’t get sickeningly rich off these cases.


13 posted on 07/19/2014 2:28:30 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
I have no use whatsoever for tobacco companies or the products they make.Add to that the fact that both my parents died ugly deaths thanks to smoking related illnesses (mother->lung cancer,father->COPD) and you'll find me quite vigorously against smoking.However,stuff like this is beyond crazy.The (very) short explanation of that opinion is...cigarettes were routinely referred to as "coffin nails" in the 1930's and there have been warnings on cigarette packs since the early 60's.This dead guy has earned most...if not all...of the blame for his demise.

No sympathy from me for either the dead guy or his family.Absolutely none!

14 posted on 07/19/2014 2:28:37 PM PDT by SayNoToDems (Will the dancing Hitlers please wait in the wings? We're only seeing singing Hitlers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

The side that used meth — Hitler and the Germans — lost.


15 posted on 07/19/2014 2:29:13 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; GeronL

How many of the state’s top Democrat donors are lawyers on this case?

In Texas, I recall John O’Quinn and other insider Dems (private practice working a public case for state) splitting a billion dollars paid out from the “out of court settlement” when several states had a class action lawsuit against Big Tobacco.


16 posted on 07/19/2014 2:29:16 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Elian Gonzalez sought asylum and was sent back to Cuba, send these kids back to THEIR parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer One
RE: "Just another example of ignoring personal responsibility"

I recall in the 1940s cigarettes were called cancer sticks and coffin nails. We all knew then, it was known for generations before.

And right, sugar and fat, are likely on the way to being milked for billions -- then paper and those painful and sometimes "life-threatening" paper cuts, shoe laces coming untied . . . .

Slip-and-fall lawyers and government employees will destroy the earth!

17 posted on 07/19/2014 2:32:52 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

http://youtu.be/jQUNk5meJHs

“...the jury seemed most persuaded by 1994 C-Span footage of tobacco industry executives claiming smoking did not cause cancer and was not addictive, and by 60-year-old internal documents showing the company knew otherwise.”

Yet many a Freeper will deny nicotine is addictive.


18 posted on 07/19/2014 2:33:08 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This is-and always was-BS. Whatever substance you, as an adult drink, eat, smoke, inhale, rub on your skin, or however else you ingest/absorb it is a personal choice with personal responsibility attached-not a cash cow for trial lawyers and intrusive government. Does someone want to tell me again how it is GOOD for us if nanny government unselfishly “protects” us from ourselves? What party do the trial lawyers donate to/support?


19 posted on 07/19/2014 2:34:00 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

My husband died from lung cancer too. I’ll take some. LOL!


20 posted on 07/19/2014 2:43:08 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson