Skip to comments.Key West Gay Couple That Can't Marry: "Love is Love. That's All That Matters."
Posted on 07/22/2014 6:30:49 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
A Monroe County judge yesterday said a Key West couple can't marry despite his ruling that Florida's ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional. Chief Judge Luis Garcia said in an appeal by the state of Florida, "The automatic stay, currently in place, shall remain in place until completion of appellate proceedings or until further order of this Court."
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.browardpalmbeach.com ...
There was just a "rally" at the Monroe county courthouse in support of homosexuality...one of the lcal Miami stations was there....
I suppose if TRUE marriage supporters were to hold a rally, the local news would give the same sympathetic coverage.
By the way did you know the NBC owned tv station in Miami is an official sponsor of the annual homosexual march in Miami Beach? It is true.
So if you loved your biological brother or sister, or if you loved a 10 year old boy, that's all that matters? There are rules and social constructs for a reason.
Watch as the gay mafia sets up pickets at the Judge’s home.
If “love” is all that matters to them why the insistence on the legal status of marriage? I guess that’s not ALL that matters after all.
The left seeks to deconstruct those rules and barriers in order to create their guiltless and blameless utopia.
If love is all that matters, then the formality of marriage shouldn’t make any difference to you.
I’m confused. For years now, all I’ve heard from the Left is that marriage is an outdated concept. Love is all that matters and all you need do is shack up and share your love without sanction from church or state. Just feel the love. Now the tune has changed and marriage is the only way to consummate the love between these two homosexual human beings. Oh! the humanity. Could it be that the Left has discovered that the government subsidizes marriage and what this couple really wants to do is to cash in on the free stuff?
Ah, but the “formality of marriage” means an acceptance of their “love”,
so, “love” must not be “all that matters”, eh?
Acceptance by society must have a higher value to them.
Don't forget necrophiles and bestophiles will also claim "Love is love. That's all that matters." If homosexual perversion claims it is a "right", then all sexual perversions can be claimed as a "right" which all must be forced to recognize.
The Liberal Lie: "All beliefs are to be tolerated except those that are not tolerant."
Destruction of marriage is still and always has been the goal.
Last time I checked, homosexual buggery did not beget children.
They are confusing ‘Love’ with ‘Lust’.......................
Even if I didn’t find gay sex repugnant I would have trouble generating much sympathy for a cause effecting 1.6% of the population.
Exactly, and then the destruction of society.
Yes. That's what Fluffy and I are counting on.
THAT is all that matters.
It is biology that is preventing them from marrying, not the law.
“”Love is love. That’s all that matters.”
So if you loved your biological brother or sister, or if you loved a 10 year old boy, that’s all that matters? There are rules and social constructs for a reason. “
Man, I can’t wait until people can marry trees and cars....
I love my car. I pay for its upkeep. Can I marry my car and get an extra deduction for another dependent ? In this case the exhaust pipes will remain inviolate.
Could it be that the Left has discovered that the government subsidizes marriage and what this couple really wants to do is to cash in on the free stuff?
...think ‘estate tax laws’ and you have your answer...
It isn't about the "right" to marry. It never was. It is about imposing the pervert agenda everywhere.
Barf alert STAT!
Last time I checked, homosexual buggery did not beget children.
...no, but fecund women trolling for ‘surrogacy’ opportunities do...
That's the very definition of a tranny.
But if I pointed that out, my guess is I'd be the one who'd be called a hater.
If that's all that matters, why do they insist on sodomizing each other?
They look like they could be brothers. Narcissism defined. In love with their own reflections.
Narcissism defined. In love with their own reflections.
...must be the feel of all that stubble scraping their cheeks as they engage in deep, longing tongueplay...
Buggering each other in the butt is just going to make a stinky mess ... not a baby.
‘All you need is love,
All you need is love,
All you need is love, love
Love is all you need!’
So let them marry “fecund women trolling for ‘surrogacy’ opportunities”.
...I see the point of my post completely eluded you...
...but you certainly do see, I’m sure, that these two, or any other like couple, can ‘naturally have’ all the children they wish, just by paying women to carry the child to term...they can go ‘forth and multiply’ the same way anyone else does, completely apart from whether they bugger each other or not...
...they can ‘marry’ each other, be completely chaste, and have natural children...all of which becomes a business opportunity with the mainstreaming of the surrogacy line of work...
Some actual couples (1 man, 1 woman) are unable to conceive because of injury, illness, age or defect. These couples are unable to conceive due to accident, not to nature. In the abstract, a couple made of 1 man and 1 woman can beget children.
With these two, or with any same sex pair, it is not so. A same sex pair's absolute inability to beget children with each other is a matter of nature: they are both male (or both female). Even in the abstract, they are unable to procreate together.
I'm sure you see the difference between a sexual pair which in the abstract can beget children, and a homosex pair which in the abstract cannot.
I’m sure you see the difference between a sexual pair which in the abstract can beget children, and a homosex pair which in the abstract cannot.
...yeah, I do see the difference...and as regards the ‘marriage mockery’ issue, civil unions were the perfect answer...however, such unions did not address the social benefits afforded traditional marriage, so these people deemed that their ‘marriages’ counted the same, so communal assets can be transferred with as little trouble as possible...but the sad point in fact is, that since we fall all over ourselves to be inclusive, we mainstream such practices as ‘maternal surrogates’, along with artificial insemination, and voila, inability to procreate is no longer an issue...and buggery itself becomes a completely moot point...
...btw, we may infer that these two twinkies are buggering each other, but we do not know that...I fervently hope that
they are chaste, because the thought of these two ‘good ol boys’ kissing and caressing is a truly barfable moment...
No one state currently stops two people of either genders to shack up together.
So why the complaining from these lobbies... well because it all about the POWER...