Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Key West Gay Couple That Can't Marry: "Love is Love. That's All That Matters."
New Times ^ | 7/22/14

Posted on 07/22/2014 6:30:49 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

A Monroe County judge yesterday said a Key West couple can't marry despite his ruling that Florida's ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional. Chief Judge Luis Garcia said in an appeal by the state of Florida, "The automatic stay, currently in place, shall remain in place until completion of appellate proceedings or until further order of this Court."

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.browardpalmbeach.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: florida; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; truth
The south Florida media is fawning over these two men.

There was just a "rally" at the Monroe county courthouse in support of homosexuality...one of the lcal Miami stations was there....

I suppose if TRUE marriage supporters were to hold a rally, the local news would give the same sympathetic coverage.

By the way did you know the NBC owned tv station in Miami is an official sponsor of the annual homosexual march in Miami Beach? It is true.

1 posted on 07/22/2014 6:30:49 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"Love is love. That's all that matters."

So if you loved your biological brother or sister, or if you loved a 10 year old boy, that's all that matters? There are rules and social constructs for a reason.

2 posted on 07/22/2014 6:33:47 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Watch as the gay mafia sets up pickets at the Judge’s home.


3 posted on 07/22/2014 6:36:50 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

If “love” is all that matters to them why the insistence on the legal status of marriage? I guess that’s not ALL that matters after all.


4 posted on 07/22/2014 6:37:06 AM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

The left seeks to deconstruct those rules and barriers in order to create their guiltless and blameless utopia.


5 posted on 07/22/2014 6:38:21 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

If love is all that matters, then the formality of marriage shouldn’t make any difference to you.


6 posted on 07/22/2014 6:38:44 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I’m confused. For years now, all I’ve heard from the Left is that marriage is an outdated concept. Love is all that matters and all you need do is shack up and share your love without sanction from church or state. Just feel the love. Now the tune has changed and marriage is the only way to consummate the love between these two homosexual human beings. Oh! the humanity. Could it be that the Left has discovered that the government subsidizes marriage and what this couple really wants to do is to cash in on the free stuff?


7 posted on 07/22/2014 6:41:19 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Anyone who has been married for more than five minutes knows marriage is about a little more than "love" which is fleeting.
8 posted on 07/22/2014 6:42:09 AM PDT by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Ah, but the “formality of marriage” means an acceptance of their “love”,

so, “love” must not be “all that matters”, eh?

Acceptance by society must have a higher value to them.


9 posted on 07/22/2014 6:42:45 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
So if you loved your biological brother or sister, or if you loved a 10 year old boy, that's all that matters? There are rules and social constructs for a reason.

Don't forget necrophiles and bestophiles will also claim "Love is love. That's all that matters." If homosexual perversion claims it is a "right", then all sexual perversions can be claimed as a "right" which all must be forced to recognize.

The Liberal Lie: "All beliefs are to be tolerated except those that are not tolerant."

10 posted on 07/22/2014 6:43:03 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Destruction of marriage is still and always has been the goal.


11 posted on 07/22/2014 6:43:10 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"Love is Love. That's All That Matters."

Last time I checked, homosexual buggery did not beget children.

12 posted on 07/22/2014 6:43:27 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

They are confusing ‘Love’ with ‘Lust’.......................


13 posted on 07/22/2014 6:44:39 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Even if I didn’t find gay sex repugnant I would have trouble generating much sympathy for a cause effecting 1.6% of the population.


14 posted on 07/22/2014 6:45:04 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Exactly, and then the destruction of society.


15 posted on 07/22/2014 6:47:21 AM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
"Love is love. That's all that matters." So if you loved your biological brother or sister, or if you loved a 10 year old boy, that's all that matters?"

Yes. That's what Fluffy and I are counting on.

16 posted on 07/22/2014 6:49:51 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("World History is not full of good governments, or of good voters either "--P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

STFU.

THAT is all that matters.


17 posted on 07/22/2014 6:53:06 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

It is biology that is preventing them from marrying, not the law.


18 posted on 07/22/2014 6:53:12 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter; All

“”Love is love. That’s all that matters.”
So if you loved your biological brother or sister, or if you loved a 10 year old boy, that’s all that matters? There are rules and social constructs for a reason. “

Man, I can’t wait until people can marry trees and cars....


19 posted on 07/22/2014 6:59:41 AM PDT by PenguinM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

I love my car. I pay for its upkeep. Can I marry my car and get an extra deduction for another dependent ? In this case the exhaust pipes will remain inviolate.


20 posted on 07/22/2014 7:13:18 AM PDT by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Could it be that the Left has discovered that the government subsidizes marriage and what this couple really wants to do is to cash in on the free stuff?

...think ‘estate tax laws’ and you have your answer...


21 posted on 07/22/2014 7:35:06 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Spare me this hyperbolic nonsense! All this "couple" need do is travel to any of the 19 states (at last count) where gay marriage has been made legal or (like ours) where the gutless governor has decided not to appeal the judicial fiat ruling where it has been declared legal. Then, they can have their make-believe wedding and get a real legal certificate to prove it.

It isn't about the "right" to marry. It never was. It is about imposing the pervert agenda everywhere.

22 posted on 07/22/2014 7:36:01 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Barf alert STAT!


23 posted on 07/22/2014 7:37:35 AM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Last time I checked, homosexual buggery did not beget children.

...no, but fecund women trolling for ‘surrogacy’ opportunities do...


24 posted on 07/22/2014 7:37:41 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"LGBT youth... are not only at risk of being victims of hate crimes but are also at an increased risk of self-hate offenses -- such as self-mutilation..."

That's the very definition of a tranny.

But if I pointed that out, my guess is I'd be the one who'd be called a hater.

25 posted on 07/22/2014 7:37:52 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (A Buddhist goes over to a hot-dog vendor and says, "Make me one with everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
What a cute couple ...
26 posted on 07/22/2014 7:38:14 AM PDT by shove_it (My real nickname is Otter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
"Love is love. That's all that matters."

If that's all that matters, why do they insist on sodomizing each other?

27 posted on 07/22/2014 7:39:30 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (A Buddhist goes over to a hot-dog vendor and says, "Make me one with everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

They look like they could be brothers. Narcissism defined. In love with their own reflections.


28 posted on 07/22/2014 7:43:33 AM PDT by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

Narcissism defined. In love with their own reflections.

...must be the feel of all that stubble scraping their cheeks as they engage in deep, longing tongueplay...


29 posted on 07/22/2014 7:49:20 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
So let them marry "fecund women trolling for 'surrogacy' opportunities".

Buggering each other in the butt is just going to make a stinky mess ... not a baby.

30 posted on 07/22/2014 7:53:05 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

‘All you need is love,
All you need is love,
All you need is love, love
Love is all you need!’

What nonsense.


31 posted on 07/22/2014 8:18:49 AM PDT by x1stcav (Leftism is like rust. It corrodes twenty-four hous a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

So let them marry “fecund women trolling for ‘surrogacy’ opportunities”.

...I see the point of my post completely eluded you...

...but you certainly do see, I’m sure, that these two, or any other like couple, can ‘naturally have’ all the children they wish, just by paying women to carry the child to term...they can go ‘forth and multiply’ the same way anyone else does, completely apart from whether they bugger each other or not...

...they can ‘marry’ each other, be completely chaste, and have natural children...all of which becomes a business opportunity with the mainstreaming of the surrogacy line of work...


32 posted on 07/22/2014 8:38:49 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

Puke


33 posted on 07/22/2014 8:42:44 AM PDT by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
They can do all of those things without going through some sort of mockery of marriage. A "marriage" involving the two of them has nothing to do with going forth and multiplying. It has only to do with them sodomizing each other. Any "multiplying" either of them might do necessarily involves a third party.

Some actual couples (1 man, 1 woman) are unable to conceive because of injury, illness, age or defect. These couples are unable to conceive due to accident, not to nature. In the abstract, a couple made of 1 man and 1 woman can beget children.

With these two, or with any same sex pair, it is not so. A same sex pair's absolute inability to beget children with each other is a matter of nature: they are both male (or both female). Even in the abstract, they are unable to procreate together.

I'm sure you see the difference between a sexual pair which in the abstract can beget children, and a homosex pair which in the abstract cannot.

34 posted on 07/22/2014 8:55:58 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

I’m sure you see the difference between a sexual pair which in the abstract can beget children, and a homosex pair which in the abstract cannot.

...yeah, I do see the difference...and as regards the ‘marriage mockery’ issue, civil unions were the perfect answer...however, such unions did not address the social benefits afforded traditional marriage, so these people deemed that their ‘marriages’ counted the same, so communal assets can be transferred with as little trouble as possible...but the sad point in fact is, that since we fall all over ourselves to be inclusive, we mainstream such practices as ‘maternal surrogates’, along with artificial insemination, and voila, inability to procreate is no longer an issue...and buggery itself becomes a completely moot point...

...btw, we may infer that these two twinkies are buggering each other, but we do not know that...I fervently hope that
they are chaste, because the thought of these two ‘good ol boys’ kissing and caressing is a truly barfable moment...


35 posted on 07/22/2014 10:15:05 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

No one state currently stops two people of either genders to shack up together.

So why the complaining from these lobbies... well because it all about the POWER...


36 posted on 07/22/2014 2:24:56 PM PDT by GraceG (No, My Initials are not A.B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson