Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Clinton 'could sabotage' Hillary's run for President as he is 'deeply conflicted'
UK Daily Mail ^ | July 23, 2014 | David Martosko

Posted on 07/23/2014 6:52:43 AM PDT by C19fan

Bill Clinton doesn't want his wife to win the U.S. presidency, according to sources cited in an explosive new book about the $100 million conglomerate that the Clintons have become since they left the White House. The former president is 'deeply conflicted' about the idea, writes Daniel Halper in 'Clinton Inc.: The Audacious Rebuilding of a Political Machine,' a well-sourced and easy-reading book released Tuesday. A former senior adviser to President Clinton told Halper that if Mrs. Clinton, the presumptive Democratic favorite, should become president, 'Clinton's f***ed.'

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billclinton; clinton; hillary2016; sabotage; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Liz

She get a free bowl of soup with that hat?


21 posted on 07/23/2014 7:14:16 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

This purveys a perspective totally opposite of the understanding of years of “the Clintons”.

It was understood for many years IT would be Bill, THEN Hill in the WH, but Bill allegedly blew the bridge to that future, and ended up with Obama as the “Party” couldn’t trust either of them to put their interests first.

It was the Clinton’s bank account first, THEN the party’s interests is what appeared to be the priority, thus when it came time for Hill’s coronation, the party backed Obama the “yes man”.

That’s how we saw the story of the Clinton’s for many years, thus find it difficult to buy that Bill would not want to be where he intended to be albeit later in life with Hillary in the WH.


22 posted on 07/23/2014 7:18:12 AM PDT by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I never thought he was a good looking man, but sitting next to her in this picture makes him comparatively stunning!


23 posted on 07/23/2014 7:18:49 AM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

LOL——gotta give it to her for having the guts to wear the abomination.


24 posted on 07/23/2014 7:18:55 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
I guess it's a well known secret in Arkansas that Chelsea is Webster Hubble's. Bill also allegedly said in the same conversation that he is sterile.

Come to think of it that is probably true. No love children have sprung up from any of his affairs. Birth Control is never 100% affective.

25 posted on 07/23/2014 7:18:58 AM PDT by defconw (Both parties have clearly lost their minds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz
The reminders of one other "first couple" are stark...


26 posted on 07/23/2014 7:21:06 AM PDT by ScottinVA (If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Not in a million years.


27 posted on 07/23/2014 7:21:43 AM PDT by Corporate Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defconw

first I’ve heard this ... chapter and verse ?


28 posted on 07/23/2014 7:23:34 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knarf
www.nationalenquirer.com/.../exposed-bill-clinton-paternity-bombshell-im- not-chelseas-real-dad

Before you scoff, they had John Edwards completely right.

29 posted on 07/23/2014 7:29:45 AM PDT by defconw (Both parties have clearly lost their minds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Reddy
Musta been true love.


30 posted on 07/23/2014 7:30:33 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
... if Mrs. Clinton, the presumptive Democratic favorite, should become president, 'Clinton's f***ed.'

Along with the rest of us!

31 posted on 07/23/2014 7:33:43 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

sure looks like lewinsky


32 posted on 07/23/2014 7:35:27 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Come on, DNA would be a waste of money, that girl is pure Webb Hubble.


33 posted on 07/23/2014 7:35:54 AM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz
<><> their memoirs made millions....

I would say their memoirs made millions for the Clintons, for the publishers, not so much.

34 posted on 07/23/2014 7:38:06 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: defconw

not scoffin’ ... off to go read ... thanx


35 posted on 07/23/2014 7:38:37 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay
Energizer

The Enquirer found John-boy Edwards squeeze, this one shouldn't be that hard to photograph now that they have drones.

36 posted on 07/23/2014 7:39:17 AM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: defconw

403 - forbidden


37 posted on 07/23/2014 7:40:45 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

The word “gentleman” is used too indiscriminately imo.


38 posted on 07/23/2014 7:42:24 AM PDT by punknpuss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Er....I see what you mean.


39 posted on 07/23/2014 7:45:20 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

At times during Hillary’s 2008 campaign, Bill turned up and seemed “off message”, if that’s the right term. He railed against the media pushing Obama, and “fairy tales” being told about Obama, about playing race cards, about being shut out of caucuses in Nevada unfairly. He seemed to go off on his own during Hillary’s campaign, and was not always helpful to Hillary by his actions.


40 posted on 07/23/2014 7:51:16 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson