[cuban leaf]

Even if such marriages are legal, there are people who don’t agree. Should they be forced to provide services to something they don’t agree with?

---

The other side would tell you that if you don’t force them, you end up with Jim Crow.

[left that other site]

No one is refusing service to anyone based upon their race.

It is the event that goes against the person’s conscience (whatever the event might be), and that is where the right to refuse to provide a particular service should be protected by the Constitution.

In the case of the Colorado Baker, the homosexuals were already customers. He had never refused them service before. It was the EVENT that was the problem, not the customer.

[fr_freak]

The other side would tell you that if you don’t force them, you end up with Jim Crow.

No doubt they would, because the other side has plenty of idiots. Jim Crow was discrimination based on race perpetrated BY THE GOVERNMENT. There were laws in place FORCING discrimination. In this case, it would be the individual choice of the business owner regarding whom they wished to serve. Big distinction, but the Left was never good with logical thought.