Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigration compromise dubbed 'amnesty,' won't stop Obama's deferrals (VIDEO)
Washington Examiner ^ | July 23 2014 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 07/23/2014 12:17:44 PM PDT by PoloSec


Critics of a bipartisan immigration bill proposed by two Texans claim it does not include any new border fence proposals, won't end the president's deportation deferral program, and doesn't go far enough to evict illegal children streaming over the border.

And, they tell Secrets, the compromise hammered out by Republican Sen. John Cornyn and Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar amounts to "amnesty" because it opens the door to letting those already facing removal orders have another chance to make their case to stay.

“This gives those who have been issued a final order or removal another bite at the apple, so in that sense, it is an amnesty,” said a memo being circulated in advance of a “members only” meeting called by Cornyn for this afternoon.

Cornyn's team, however, rejected that charge and said illegal immigrants ordered out would not get a free pass.

Cornyn has been pushing hard to get members to adopt his joint plan and there are concerns it might be folded into a Democratic plan that supports the president’s recently announced proposal. Democrats cut $1 billion out Obama’s $3.7 billion plan on Tuesday.

Cornyn-Cuellar call their bill the Helping Unaccompanied Minors and Alleviating National Emergency Act and said it would treat unaccompanied children from Latin America like those from Mexico by speeding up immigration hearings with more judges. Many believe it is a good compromise package.

But immigration hardliners and even Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid say it is too broad.

For example, say some critics on background, it doesn’t effectively end the president’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals authorized in 2012 that puts on hold deportations of younger illegal immigrants. It also wouldn’t block Obama from granting amnesty to some 5 million to 6 million already in in the United States, as demanded by Latin groups.

A competing GOP plan from Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Tennessee Rep. Marsha Blackburn would prevent money to be used for continuing DACA, future deferred actions, and the granting of work permits.

The internal memo is the latest example of how heated the fight over immigration reform is getting. In a floor speech today, Cornyn cited opposition from Democrats and said, "I would urge all of us to forget the politics and let's solve the problem."

The memo shown to Secrets lists several issues with Cornyn-Cuellar:

— Those who voluntarily return home can cross the U.S. border again without punishment.

— While it creates a seven-day court process for younger illegals, its likely that the minors will be handed over to officials to review their asylum claim, during which they will be released from custody. Most never return. The bill sponsors, however, said the bill would require detention.

— For those who haven’t returned to court in over a year, as well as those issued deportation orders but still in the U.S., the proposal invites them back but also gives them a chance to appeal. The language in the bill only includes the words “motion granted,” not also “denied.” This is seen as second shot at the judicial system, say the critics, and amounts to amnesty because the bill language is cloudy on what to do with them.

-- It leaves border security to the president, who GOP leaders like Speaker John Boehner has said can't be trusted on the issue.

— No new fencing is required.

But Cornyn's team said the bill wouldn't bar new fencing and does call for tactical infrastructure including the construction of new physical and virtual barriers.

Also, addressing the amnesty charge, a spokeswoman said, "There is no circumstance under which a previous removal order would not be replaced with a new immigration enforcement order under the HUMANE Act. Because the Obama administration has failed to enforce our immigration laws against unaccompanied alien children who have failed to appear for immigration court proceedings, the HUMANE Act would require them to appear before an immigration judge if they had illegally entered the United States during the current surge of illegal immigration.

"Once these individuals have appeared in immigration court, they would be detained by the government and required to immediately prove a claim to remain in the United States legally. If the child fails to prove this claim, they will be ordered removed from the United States and detained until they are repatriated to their home country.

"In order to prevent appeals and other delays to removal, the immigration judge would replace existing court orders with new immigration enforcement orders under the HUMANE Act."

TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty

1 posted on 07/23/2014 12:17:44 PM PDT by PoloSec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
This is especially for you, John Cornyn!

An open letter to the GOP Members of Congress

As a Representative or Senator in Congress, you took this Oath:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."

"Support and defend the Constitution" it says. Did you see that? That document, in turn, requires, per Art.4, S.4, that

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

An invasion is what we are suffering. That invasion has accelerated with each "comprehensive immigration reform" previously enacted. Instead of another disastrous reform that yet again increases the incentives for millions more to try their luck crossing the southern border, a Member of Congress who took his Oath and the Constitution seriously would be pressing for what the American people have repeatedly said they want - not what Senators Schumer and McCain, Mark Zuckerberg, Mexico, some border state farmers and homebuilders or the Chamber of Commerce rent-seekers want. That is:
  1. secure the border in a transparently verifiable way;
  2. end the anchor-baby interpretation of the 14th Amendment;
  3. enforce eVerify without exception and with severe penalties;
  4. end chain migration - entry per individual qualifications, not family ties;
  5. deportation upon contact with any law enforcement agency - federal, state or local
  6. no government benefits beyond critical emergency care (and that ought to be billed back to the home government); and
  7. NO "Path to Citizenship" - EVER - for anyone who has entered the US illegally.
Any measure that does not accomplish these things is unacceptable. It is de facto amnesty. And it will inevitably, ineluctably encourage millions and millions more illegal entries.

If the GOP is complicit in granting amnesty - and any action that permits those who entered the US illegally to benefit from that illegal act is amnesty - the GOP will cease to exist. It will not survive through the 2016 elections. The people will shun the over-tanned, glad-handing, backslapping quislings and look elsewhere for leaders who actually have the spine for the fight. Make no mistake - to me and to many, many others, amnesty is the GOP's Rubicon. Cross it at your electoral peril.

2 posted on 07/23/2014 12:24:04 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson