Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New IRS Form Proves Obama Lied About Individual Mandate Tax (Baghdad Barry an all time low)
Americans for Tax Reform ^ | 07/25/2014 | John Kartch and Ryan Ellis

Posted on 07/25/2014 6:54:45 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: John S Mosby

check out the 1095 forms required in 2016


21 posted on 07/25/2014 8:25:54 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

I changed with holding on my check, NO REFUND breaking even!!!!
Government NO LONGER using my money all year I am happy NO
OBAMMIECARE!!!!!!!!


22 posted on 07/25/2014 8:50:03 PM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

At the end of the form it will show total tax owed. The O care part will not be differentiated. It will make for some strange accounting practices to backtrack and figure out which part they can’t penalize. Because I bet there won’t be aline at the end of the form which states “This part can’t be penalized”.


23 posted on 07/25/2014 9:28:56 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

24 posted on 07/25/2014 9:50:52 PM PDT by gura (If Allah is so great, why does he need fat sexually confused fanboys to do his dirty work? -iowahawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randita

So, I see the SCOTUS going 4-4 that the law says exactly what it says. That leaves it up to Roberts, again. He already said the fines are taxes. By similar argument, the subsidies are tax *credits*, meaning they are taxes in reverse.

So, if he rules in favor of Halbig, the entire structure of Obamacare is unconstitutional on the basis of unequal federal tax treatment based on state of residence. That would violate the 14th Amendment.

But, Roberts clearly does not want to declare the law unconstitutional. So, what tortuous reasoning could he use to say that the law doesn’t say what it says? He did it once, he conceivably could do it again.


25 posted on 07/25/2014 10:18:51 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
Lots of people are not going to comply with this filing— and there is NO enforcement provision for collection except by withholding a refund <<<

It is going to take civil disobedience to deal with these thieves but in lieu of the lawlessness of this administration I have to believe they have ways of dealing with refuseniks.
Agree ???
26 posted on 07/26/2014 8:56:09 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito

Roberts’ first line of reasoning (re the mandates being a tax) have opened up the entire can of worms we’re seeing now via Halbig, etc.

With his first ruling, Roberts opened up the Pandora’s Box of equal federal tax treatment. Some post-analyses of Robert’s decision said Robert’s ruling was going to mean big trouble for the law down the road and they were right. It’s taken years to see that come to fruition, but it’s finally here.

What the feds are doing now by applying the tax credits equally to residents of all states WOULD pass constitutional muster. Big problem is that is contrary to ACA wording, no two ways about it.

These tax credit challenge cases may not even be taken up by SCOTUS, depending on what the en banc DC Circuit decides.

If the full DC Circuit upholds the previous three judge panel decision, then I don’t think SCOTUS would even take the case. They won’t want to get into the realm of rewriting law and will just tell Congress to fix it, but for now the law must be enforced as written.


27 posted on 07/26/2014 9:48:11 AM PDT by randita ("Is a nation without borders a nation?"...Noonan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

I wonder how many people have not/will not sign up for ObamaCare. I don’t see any reporting of this. Perhaps no one knows.


28 posted on 07/26/2014 10:03:04 AM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
 photo 143062_600.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

29 posted on 07/26/2014 10:08:23 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson