Skip to comments.After Asking Employees to Reveal Personal Beliefs, Chase Faces Boycott
Posted on 07/26/2014 11:24:02 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Over 4,000 Americans have signed a petition to boycott Chase bank over a company survey that probed employees about their sexual orientation and personal beliefs.
The National Organization for Marriages campaign, Void Chase, urges customers across the globe to take their banking business elsewhere until JPMorgan Chase apologizes and promises never again to invade the privacy of your employees in this way.
The effort is the result of what critics call an invasive survey that asked whether Chase employees identify themselves as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, or as an LGBT ally.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...
But liberals are perfectly OK w gun owners having to be “outed”(registered)....
Unfortunately refusal to answer in the affirmative will most likely be taken as an answer in the negative.
They are misunderstanding Chase’s motivation. They want to find all the perverts so they can give them special consideration and privileges.
never again to invade the privacy of your employees in this way.
They will just invade their privacy in a different way!
It’s part of the Settlement with the DOJ
These kinds of NAZI tactics must be fought, hard.
The left has decided that those who do not celebrate their perversions aren’t really human.
Chase Bank has long been a sleazebag outfit.
And you thought that big businesses opposed leftist policies.
“They want to find all the perverts so they can give them special consideration and privileges.”
Having contracted with Chase that is exactly their reasoning. Compliant employees will be promoted over those who are not.
The Obama regime loves to slap labels on people. Now they are forcing employers to do the same thing.
Exactly - I recently refused to sign an agreement at work (DOD teaching job) because one of the items, "Ensure that students become better airmen and people in general because of your involvement." was an impossible thing to insure.
That's right. It's a passive-aggressive tactic to "out" those who won't embrace or validate perversions and delusions.
Same with companies who get involved in "pride" celebrations, conveniently assuming that there are no "haters" in the group. Thus they force the employees still in their right minds to opt out of participation, and slap, they become labeled and targeted for special treatment. *Gotcha*
They resort to these sinister tactics because otherwise, normal, competent, decent people just go about doing their jobs, not bothering anybody or snooping into what people do in their private business on their own time. The lawless busybodies despise this spirit of character.
It's no different than
4. Then this Daniel became distinguished above the presidents and satraps, because an excellent spirit was in him; and the king planned to set him over the whole realm:
5. Then the presidents and satraps sought to find a pretext against Daniel concerning the kingdom; but they could find no pretext nor fault; because he was faithful, and no error or fault was found in him:
(So they had to craft a special law in order to make Daniel guilty of something.)
Boycott, hell—I already transferred my retirement account from JPMorgan/Chase to another company.