Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama refuses to set upper limit on tax rate
American Thinker ^ | 07/26/2014 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 07/26/2014 11:37:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

James Pethokoukis of the American Enterprise Institute noticed a very revealing moment in President Obama’s Thursday interview with CNBC’s Steve Liesman:

STEVE LIESMAN: Mr. President, I just want to pivot back one more time to domestic issues.  You’ve said a bunch of times that getting the wealthy to pay a little bit more, and you’ve succeeded in raising that top tax rate to 39% or rolling back the tax cuts. Is there a limit there?  Is there a limit to how much you believe the government should take from an individual in terms of a top tax rate?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: You know, I don’t have a particular number in mind, but if you look at our history we are still well below what, you know, the marginal tax rates were under Dwight Eisenhower or, you know, all the way up even through Ronald Reagan.  Tax rates are still lower on average for most folks.  And what that means is that we probably can make some more headway in closing loopholes that folks take advantage of. As opposed to necessarily raising marginal rates.


(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: obama; taxes; taxrate

1 posted on 07/26/2014 11:37:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Do you get it? He’s a marxist! He wants it all!
Under communism, the government is the sole employer, and the sole producer, and the owner of all property.

By constantly raising tax rates, he gets us ever closer to complete marxism, without most people getting their heads out of their a$$e$ long enough to know what’s happening.


2 posted on 07/26/2014 11:40:20 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There will come a day when this useless, piece of trash will no longer be President, and our nation will be a better place because of it. We just have to endure his nonsense for a bit longer.


3 posted on 07/26/2014 11:41:05 AM PDT by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama wants All money to go to him and he’ll give everyone an allowance if they’re Good Drones


4 posted on 07/26/2014 11:41:08 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’d settle for him putting a limit on how much taxpayer money he can spend on his and Moochelle’s vacays.


5 posted on 07/26/2014 11:44:03 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There IS an upper limit on tax rates - 100%

Simultaneously, there is also a bottom limit on tax revenues - $0

If the objective is to collect maximum amount of revenue, then by all means, keep the tax rate low, and keep limiting restrictions on business activity at a minimum. The government coffers would overflow with the lavish collections.

But “an embarrassment of riches” is not what this Current Regime is looking for. Sure, they SAY that they want to keep it “fair” for the “little guy”, but what exactly does that mean? It means, dear readers and astute thinkers, that “fairness” requires that we must all be “little guys”.

The politics of the anthill take over. There are no elections within the nest, and the order is already established, deviation is not permitted. The roles already assigned are not to be challenged.

This is probably fine, if you are six-legged, have a segmented body, and communicate by touching antenna.

Ants do not pay taxes. They toil, until their exhausted and decrepit bodies fall, then the parts are carried off by other ants.

But if you are The Queen, why, then, it is GOOD to be Queen.


6 posted on 07/26/2014 11:59:01 AM PDT by alloysteel (Most people become who they promised they would never be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Yes, he wants the government to confiscate 100% of income above a certain level - what he considers at any particular moment to be “rich.” That’s a moving target, depending on which fundraiser he is at.


7 posted on 07/26/2014 11:59:12 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
Based on past history, the Zero does have a particular number in mind. Once you learn how to understand Obama it's clear. Guessing the percent is another matter, 110%, 120%? That seems about right.
8 posted on 07/26/2014 12:03:23 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CaspersGh0sts

Obama is going to be a divisive but influential force for decades to come. He will be an unfettered, loose cannon who can cause plenty of mischief and discord. You can expect the Community Organizer to play the race and ethnicity card. And he will rolling in cash from his speaking engagements and representation on various Broads of Directors. You ain’t seen nothing yet.


9 posted on 07/26/2014 12:08:11 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No Limit...

Reminds me of Trayvon Martin’s Twitter account name.


10 posted on 07/26/2014 12:10:25 PM PDT by paint_your_wagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Obama II’s old man, the Marxist professional student, drunk driving, wife beating bigamist who couldn’t hold a job wrote a scholarly paper on taxing people at 100%.
People like him—who knew best—would decide how much of your money was returned to you.
According to this dream from Obama the Elder, any of your money returned to you was of course subject to a number of conditions, like the feds, who produce nothing and neither do they spin.
I believe most of Zero’s many problems stem from not having a Daddy, much like Slick William, so they both overcompensate, act out and generally spaz all day long.


11 posted on 07/26/2014 12:23:37 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama: "You know, I don’t have a particular number in mind, but if you look at our history we are still well below what, you know, the marginal tax rates were under Dwight Eisenhower or, you know, all the way up even through Ronald Reagan."

Strictly for the low-info mouth-breather because it disregards the Reagan tax reforms (1986) that closed tax loopholes, deductions and adjusted tax brackets. A particular example was that previously you could deduct all personal interest on the Sch.A as well as (grin) political contributions. Given that the buying power of the inflation adjusted dollars were far higher back then (1950-$10 for 2014-$1 / 1960-$8 / 1970-$6 / 1980-$3), all of the standard brackets were correspondingly more valuable. So this meant that the Margin rates at the highest incomes were much greater and so correspondingly fewer paid it.

Ah, but what is logic and knowledge compared to soaring political rhetoric for a trillion $ / per year President?

12 posted on 07/26/2014 12:33:23 PM PDT by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Im betting he doesn’t live for decades to come.


13 posted on 07/26/2014 2:12:31 PM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles (Remember, you can't spell "progressive" without "SS".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

> we probably can make some more headway in closing loopholes that folks take advantage of.

Dependent exemptions, home mortgage deductions, oh, and the Obamacare tax increase, he’s keepin’ that.


14 posted on 07/27/2014 11:48:40 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CaspersGh0sts
There will come a day when this useless, piece of trash will no longer be President, and our nation will be a better place because of it. We just have to endure his nonsense for a bit longer.

I dunno, Mugabe's been president since 1987 and he's still around.


15 posted on 07/27/2014 11:54:20 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

his friends will all be exempt of course


16 posted on 07/27/2014 11:57:12 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

The second medal from the left and the one on the end like the medals Lurch threw over the White House Fence


17 posted on 07/27/2014 11:59:28 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson