Legally owning a firearm has nothing to do with assassinations as this Miller suggests.
Miller didn’t suggest it. She was quoting an email she received from DC City Council Chairman Phil Mendelson.
right now oly the criminals - civillian and got thug - run around dc with guns, and afaik none of them have cared to take a shot at any of our presidents.
legal gunowners arent gonna instantly break bad and become assassins. these people simply do not know how to think logically and coherently.
Emily Miller is one of the "good guys".
Miller, as senior editor of the Washington Times opinion pages, is no stranger to asking the tough questions, her 2011 eye-opening exposé in the Washington Times, Emily Gets Her Gun, on D.C.s incredibly stringent gun laws, revealed how obtaining a firearm in our nations capital is an arduous process that functions to discourage gun ownership amongst the law-abiding.
That exposé in the Washington Times became the foundational text for her book, Emily Gets Her Gun: But Obama Wants to Take Yours, which takes a more in-depth look at D.C.s convoluted firearm registration process, as well as her journey into the gun community and the ongoing national debate over gun control.
“Legally owning a firearm has nothing to do with assassinations as this Miller suggests.”
Oh, really? Next, I suppose you will be saying that legally owning a pickup truck has nothing to do with deliberately running people down or legally owning a sword has nothing to do with cutting off heads etc. Obviously you are a vast right wing conspiratorial, racist, climate change denying, bible believing, anti-choice Ted Cruz supporting nutcase.
"This Miller" suggested no such thing, she quoted someone.
I suggest you Google "Emily Gets Her Gun" to learn who, and what, Emily Miller is.