Posted on 07/30/2014 12:14:52 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
Solid points, I’m with you. I like Cruz, but he’s turning into a politician. How any serious leader in the USA right now can discuss -anything- but millions of third world illiterates (most are even illiterate,,,IN SPANISH) flooding in escapes me.
Second is the immediate, existential danger of the moslem world running wild. And Cruz is in a lather about Crimea. Lawyers never cease to amaze.
Solid points, I’m with you. I like Cruz, but he’s turning into a politician. How any serious leader in the USA right now can discuss -anything- but millions of third world illiterates (most are even illiterate,,,IN SPANISH) flooding in escapes me.
Second is the immediate, existential danger of the moslem world running wild. And Cruz is in a lather about Crimea. Lawyers never cease to amaze.
Ted Cruz: The second coming of Ronald W. Reagan after the second coming of Jimmy Carter.
Territorial gain through the use of force was supposed to have been outlawed by the UN wasn’t it??
You forgot to add “Onward to Empire!” and “All Hail The Tsar!”
“Because Crimea was part of Russia before California was part of the U.S.”
Hell, it was Russian before KENTUCKY was a state.
Crimea is part of Ukraine now. This is not about the age of Charlemagne
Jeepers, does that mean Russia has a claim on Kentucky?
Hey Azzwipe. I made a fact based observation. I didn’t call you or anyone with a different take on it a retard or a traitor.
And since when is it treason to not defend anything over in Ukraine? LOL I don’t remember pledging allegiance to Ukraine, indivisible, with jackboots, and skinheads for all.
The only alleged use of a ballistic missile was in a rural area on enemy targets. As for artillery, I am unsure about this, but I do know that the Russkies are shooting and taking up positions next to apartment buildings, schools, hospitals, things of that nature. Furthermore, the civilians themselves say that the Russkies are shooting artillery and grads randomly at their own cities. Why? Because the separatists do not have very much support in the East and South and, furthermore, they can blame it on the Ukrainians and maybe get more recruits.
"Ukrainska Pravda reports that between 20-30 people were killed today in Gorlovka when the centre of the town was struck by Grad rockets. One of the shells reportedly struck and exploded not far from the central maternity hospital. The rockets were reportedly fired from the outskirts of the town. Some local reports claimed they were fired by separatist militants." http://www.interpretermag.com/ukraine-liveblog-day-160-the-battle-for-the-donbass-intensifies/ Sorry, but they are indeed national socialist, and most of their army is western Ukrainian and mobilized Svoboda, and has a full allegiance to the Banderists. Scratch a coupist, find a Nazi.
This is also false. While there are Right Sector militia fighting in the war, it is a lie that "most of their army" are all Nazis. Most of their army is the same army they've had since Yanukovych.
Right Sector and Svoboda only received 1 to 2 percent of the vote in the Presidential election. The government you call "Nazis" even has Jews in it.
But go ahead, follow Obama, the EU, Kerry, McCain, the MSM, Ashton, and Soros.
The stupidity of this statement is that you are happily believing everything Russian media and PaulBot/Alex Jones fringe websites without any problem. If you are going to claim that I am "following Obama" because I oppose Russia, then you must eschew Russkie media in order to avoid being described as "following Putin.
Giving back Ukrainian territory can’t be part of the settlement?
“The idea that border changes initiated by the Soviet Premier are something that the U.S. should go to the barricades for over 20 years after the Soviet Union disintegrated is laughable.”
Do you feel the same about Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Georgia, etc?
Some have joined NATO and some more were planning to. IOW they don’t want to be part of the “Soviet Union” any more now, than they did 70 years ago.
He should only talk about one thing? And if he did that, who would ever take him seriously as a "leader"?
Ted Cruz made an endorsement today
The crisis at America’s border is a defining issue in the coming election, especially in Arizona. I’m supporting Doug Ducey for Arizona governor because he is the best candidate to help secure the border, protect the people, and enforce the law. He has the most serious and credible plan to address the border crisis.
I guess since he thinks the border crisis is the DEFINING ISSUE of the coming election, it's still not good enough. You think he should talk about nothing else?
And tell me about how you ever earned the right to call anyone a traitor. You don’t pack the gear. You know exactly what I mean ,,,
Your retardness and treason is not dependent on any previous insults you have told me. It is dependent on your stupid and treasonous opinions.
And since when is it treason to not defend anything over in Ukraine? LOL I don’t remember pledging allegiance to Ukraine, indivisible, with jackboots, and skinheads for all.
I call you treasonous because you are Pro-Moscow, a regime that is highly anti-American, supports communist states and movements, supports Iran's nuclear program, and publishes a media that is virulently hateful to the United States and our people.
It is very clear: If you are willing to vomit up Russian media talking points and defend Putin, you are siding with the enemy.
Is Ted serious? All Obama does is throw words around. And when he doesn't back them up, he comes in for ridicule. And evicting Putin from Crimea isn't something Obama or the US are in any position to do. When the words aren't backed up with action, they'll look hollow and worthless. So obviously, it's not something the president is going to say anytime soon.
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" is a rhetorical exhortation. Nobody's going to be surprised or angry or very disappointed if Gorbachev doesn't tear down the wall immediately. "Mr. Putin, give back Crimea!" looks a lot more like a demand. Putin will ignore it and score points from his supporters, and the person who says the line will look ridiculous -- or more ridiculous. And there may be a limit to how ridiculous Obama can afford to look look (maybe ... though his supporters don't seem to notice much).
I guess Ted's idea is that we need decisive, confident, and forceful leadership now. Okay, point taken, but leadership is more a matter of action than of striking more dramatic poses. Reagan wasn't great because he bequeathed a lot of rhetorical tropes to Ted's generation, but because he was able to respond to crises with right actions rather than just fine words.
cruz-whipping-tonight-against-boehner-border-bill
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3185128/posts
You might want to pay attention. Otherwise you’ll be surprised and disappointed instead of just disappointed in the successes Cruz has in the months ahead
I think it means Texas is part of Mexico
Anyway, they all belong to the dinosaurs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.