Posted on 07/31/2014 5:15:00 AM PDT by Kaslin
This president knows what his mission is — to destroy the United States and turn it into some socialist third world banana republic. But he is too incompetent or lazy to actually come up with strategies for accomplishing his goals. So he is perfectly content to be the public face of more powerful people and groups behind the scenes who will do the real work to destroy the US.
There is zero probability that articles of impeachment will be drawn up by the House against President Obama.
Where has he actually broken the law where it cannot be argued it is simply a matter of his discretion in ‘how’ to enforce law? Remember the Arizona case in Scotus, lost by Governor Brewer, in which the court said the president is in charge of ‘how’ to enforce border law.
In the following, though, I think he’s broke the law IF he’s proven to be part of the actions:
1. Fast and Furious
2. IRS conservative targeting
3. Eavesdropping on Americans without warrants
There is zero probability that articles of impeachment will be drawn up by the House against President Obama.
Where has he actually broken the law where it cannot be argued it is simply a matter of his discretion in ‘how’ to enforce law? Remember the Arizona case in Scotus, lost by Governor Brewer, in which the court said the president is in charge of ‘how’ to enforce border law.
In the following, though, I think he’s broken the law IF he’s proven to be part of the actions:
1. Fast and Furious
2. IRS conservative targeting
3. Eavesdropping on Americans without warrants
“He’s not stupid and knows exactly what he’s doing”
You give him too much credit. He’s following directions of people around him
That's exactly my point.His entire life is taken from the pages of Rules For Radicals and from the writings of that guy who was so prominently featured in the pages of the NY Times on 9/11/2001...the one who said he's wasn't sorry for the bombs he planted and wished he could have planted more.
Someone please help me with his name...I'm having a mental block! ;-)
They can explain it to Our Lord, just before He throws them into the Lake of Fire.
Yes.
You give him too little credit.We underestimate his intelligence at our peril.He's not "following directions" of those around him...he's surrounded himself with individuals who are just as intelligent and just as utterly amoral as is he.
Aren’t both impeachable offenses?
Obviously BOTH
Rules for Radicals == Saul Alinsky
Was the NY Times guy Bill Ayres?
He’s not a manger, CEO, CFO, diplomat, lawyer, doctor, railroad chief.
He’s a Community Organizer which means he knows how to create havoc, rabble raise, and NOT HOW TO FIX IT.
Not amoral, IMO. Immoral.
I think he knows full well that his agenda is evil and destructive, and follows it deliberately because he wants to be evil and destructive.
Yup,that;s him.He's the guy that Osama Obama says he just bumped into once or twice in the neighborhood.Of course Ayers tells a far different story...and I'm inclined to believe the *self-admitted* Maoist on that one.
Yes.
I agree. And my tagline says where I think this will go.
We’ve actually seen no proof of his intellect beyond his ability to READ a speech written, probably, by someone else.
When he doesn’t have that text in front of him, he sounds like someone you’d be circumspect about hiring to mow your lawn.
Yes.
He is lawless. Worse, he simply refuses to recognize that there are any limits on a president’s power. He thinks he has been made boss of the world.
At least 90% of the 535 members of congress see themselves as future presidents and crave the same power. No one will stop him.
My understanding of the two words is:"immoral" is one who understands the basic moral code but is unable,or unwilling,to abide by it.Some of them are capable of feeling guilt because of their actions and *some* eventually see the error of their ways and modify their thinking and behavior to comply with that code.Or,to put it another way,some "sinners" do eventually seek "redemption".
OTOH,"amoral" means that someone fully understands the basic moral code but has genuine,complete contempt for it,feels *no* guilt and have no intention whatsoever of ever conforming to this code.They *never* seek "redemption",
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.