Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"The selective targeting of one group, the immediate, unhesitating and unconditional acceptance of the assertions of one side, the draconian civil and criminal penalties, and the indecent haste with which this flawed measure was stampeded to the governor's desk, all smack of retaliation towards pro-life activists for McCullen v. Coakley," he said.

Of course it's retaliation, Big Murder considers anyone who opposes the slaughter of innocents to be the enemy. Even Dracula didn't fear the Cross they way abortionists do.

1 posted on 07/31/2014 7:00:05 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Coleus; narses; Salvation
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 07/31/2014 7:00:31 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 07/31/2014 7:01:22 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

The federal judge in Illinois who gave a deadline to their state legislature to enact a constitutional concealed carry law, *which would then be vetted by the court for constitutionality*, or else there would be no law after that date, has really hit on a new tool for the federal judiciary against obstinate local and state governments.

In this case, under instructions from the SCOTUS, or not, their federal district judges should use this same concept to slap this governor down.

That is, require that a new law must be passed by a given date, a constitutional law that will be vetted by these judges before it goes into effect, and if it is *not* constitutional, there will be *no law* that limits free speech around abortion clinics.

This makes it a catch-22 argument for those who would impose on pro-life protesters. Either they pass a law that is constitutional, and thus does not restrict their freedom of speech; or there will be no law restricting their freedom of speech at all.

Either way, they cannot oppress with the force of law.


4 posted on 07/31/2014 7:09:04 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

5% Carry 100% of Free Republic Expense


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR Or Lose It

6 posted on 07/31/2014 7:17:08 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I’d wager that those who mourn the deepest the tragic death of Gazan children caught in the folly of their own leaders are also the ones who virtually CELEBRATE the ability of “mothers” here who set out to prevent the very birth of their own children.


7 posted on 07/31/2014 7:22:05 AM PDT by CaptainAmiigaf (NY TIMES: We print the news as it fits our views.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Nice to see that government can act promptly when the vital interests of its constituents are at stake. /sarc


8 posted on 07/31/2014 7:27:10 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson