Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The "Sharing Economy": Will Americans Embrace The Entrepreneurial Revival?
Townhall.com ^ | August 3, 2014 | Austin Hill

Posted on 08/03/2014 6:03:25 AM PDT by Kaslin

Back in the first century a poet named Juvenal surmised that his fellow citizens of Rome would put up with just about anything from their government, as long as they had enough food and entertainment. "Give them bread and circuses, and they'll never revolt" he wrote sarcastically.

In the 1920's Fascist Prime Minister Benito Musolini said much the same thing of his fellow citizens in Italy. The people that he governed would tolerate just about anything he wanted to do, Musoli suggested, "as long as the trains run on time."

Today Americans seem as tolerant of bad abusive government as the ancient Romans and the 20th century Italians were back in the day. But statist politicans in America may just find that they've "jumped the shark," so to speak, if they continue to selfishly manipulate the "the sharing economy."

Despite the socialistic sounding name, the essence of "the sharing economy" is actually very positive. The term is used to describe individuals and organizations providing, on a very basic and freelance basis, products and services to people who want to pay for them, and the seller and buyer are usually brought together through a website or online community.

Take for example Uber.Com, a San Francisco-based venture that matches people who need a ride from one end of a city to another with people who have cars and are willing to travel. Visit the company's website, download the app, and search for people who are ready right now to shuttle you about. If you want to be a provider, Uber.Com has a screening process whereby you can register to deliver transportation services.

This very basic " seller-hooks-up-with-buyer" type of transaction is happening at an increasing rate in cities all across the country, all on a freelance non-professional basis and mostly all via online connections. Need someone in your area to run errands or perform household chores? TaskRabbit.Com might help you find a provider who's ready right now. Got an extra room to rent for people visiting your town? AirBnB.Com connects travelers with in-home accomodations.

With people freely choosing to sell their services - and others freely choosing to buy them - it may seem confusing why anbody would object to this type of productivity. But established business owners - small business owners and large corporations alike - don't like the competition, labor unions hate it because the service providers aren't "organized," and politicans think they're "losing tax revenue" that otherwise rightfully belongs to them.

But before you throw your support to politicians and bureaucrats who promise to throw cold water on the embers of "the sharing economy," consider the things that they say, and the realities behind the rhetoric:

A) Sharing economy services providers are"un-trained and un-licensed": Sometimes this is sort-of true, but not entirely. Consider the ridesharing services that Uber.Com or Lyft.Com distribute. Labor union bureaucrats and politicians lament that the drivers aren't trained and licesned as cab drivers, yet both websites require a service provider to be a licensed driver in their jurisdiction. If politicians want to impugn people for "selling" an occassional ride across town via a website, they best crackdown on people that provide rides to friends and family without compensation as well - there isn't much difference between the two.

B) "Sharing economy services aren't taxed and that's unfair to businesses that are taxed": Again, this is sort of a "kind of true kind of not true" proposition. Granted the person who rents a room in their home or provides a ride on occassion isn't subject to the taxes, regulations, licensure and authorization fees that an actual motel owner or cab operator has to put up with. But rideshare providers pay taxes on the fuel, tires and insurance that they consume when they're driving, and room hosts pay taxes on the energy and food consumed by each of their in-home visitors.

C) "Sharing economy providers need to be subject to the same regulations and taxes as more established business owners, just so its 'fair' " : No doubt there is at times a disparity between freelancer service providers and established shop owners. The question is, what will remedy the disparity, and make things more fair? Politicians quite naturally want more control over all businesses, not less, and the option thhey never want us to consider is reducing the burdens of taxes and regulations on existing businesses instead of increasing it for the freelancers.

Will Americans allow selfish politicians and business bosses wrap their chains around freelancers? Or will we demand that the path remain clear for the freelancers? Perhaps we'll begin to act like Americans once again, instead of Italians and ancient Romans.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: entrepreneurship; sharingeconomy; uber

1 posted on 08/03/2014 6:03:25 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Keep the masses comfortable then give them the shaft by taking away their “rights” with regulations. Oh yes, stock pile ammunition just in case they “we” resist... “Bread & Circuses.”


2 posted on 08/03/2014 6:13:47 AM PDT by rusureitflies?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I like how they use the euphemism "Sharing Economy" for the free market/black market. Call it whatever you want, so long and more and more people embrace it and see the light.

Just like "life" in Jurassic Park, Adam Smith "will find a way."

3 posted on 08/03/2014 6:23:53 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee
Exactly.

Obama and his marxist planners really got it wrong this time.

Those who believed they could collapse the system to implement a government takeover didn't anticipate the entrepreneurial spirit of Americans might thwart their plans.

And when the baby boomers retire, there will be a big boom in freelancing.

4 posted on 08/03/2014 6:41:39 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (Obama: Race is his cover...jihad is his game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

High taxes depress on-the-books entrepreneurial activity.


5 posted on 08/03/2014 6:51:27 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Granted the person who rents a room in their home or provides a ride on occassion isn’t subject to the taxes, regulations, licensure and authorization fees that an actual motel owner or cab operator has to put up with. But rideshare providers pay taxes on the fuel, tires and insurance that they consume when they’re driving, and room hosts pay taxes on the energy and food consumed by each of their in-home visitors. “

This is like trying to say renters pay property taxes/school taxes through their rent payments and utility costs.


6 posted on 08/03/2014 6:57:38 AM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

5% Carry 100% of Free Republic Expense


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR Or Lose It

7 posted on 08/03/2014 6:58:22 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

I am sure that there are homeowners who who have part of their property taxes included in rent they are charging, although we never did when we were still paying our mortgage and my husband was in the service. We bought our house in late March of 1967 and moved in on April 1, 1967. Our real estate company rented our house out from August 1967 until late May of 1979 when my husband retired from the Army.


8 posted on 08/03/2014 8:01:16 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
High taxes depress on-the-books entrepreneurial activity.

Yep - and if one slips through the crack of government "oversight", you can be sure that the new "loopholes" will be specifically targeted to further suppress entrepreneurship activities...

9 posted on 08/03/2014 8:21:29 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not the same as being a landowner and getting a yearly tax bill.

Our house was paid off 20 years ago. If it weren’t for being able to rent out an apartment over the garage, we would have had to leave long ago.

9,000.00 a year in town and school taxes.


10 posted on 08/03/2014 8:22:21 AM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson