Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Tea Partiers Sink Mitch McConnell’s Kentucky Senate Reelection Bid?
Daily Beast ^ | August 4, 2014

Posted on 08/04/2014 5:54:42 AM PDT by Maceman

The Senate minority leader, long reviled among many on the right for what they see as kowtowing to Democrats, is in a tough race for his seat—and in trouble with the Tea Party.

If Alison Lundergan Grimes pulls off an upset victory over Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in November, she may have Tea Partiers to thank. But don’t expect conservative voters to rally to Grimes—they simply aren't getting behind McConnell.

Although the five-term Republican ended up winning a a tough primary challenge from businessman Matt Bevin handily, the race was one of the most vicious and ugly this cycle, with Bevin’s campaign badly damaged in a cockfighting scandal. And while some disaffected conservatives have backed McConnell in November, Bevin has still not endorsed him, and many of the Tea Party groups that supported the businessman are following suit. As a result, in a recent poll, nearly 20% of self-identified Republicans didn't support McConnell

Scott Hofstra, spokesman for the United Kentucky Tea Party, said he isn’t backing McConnell and “taking the lesser of the two evils approach.” Many conservatives, Hofstra predicted, either will leave the box on the ballot for U.S. Senate empty or will vote for David Patterson, the libertarian candidate. The senator has alienated many Tea Partiers and has yet to reach out to bridge the gap, Hofstra said. The divide was opened further, he added, by McConnell’s open support for Thad Cochran in the Mississippi Senate runoff and McConnell’s association with pro-Cochran ads that many conservatives assailed as race-baiting. “If there were some people on the fence after what happened in Kentucky, the Mississippi incident really put them over the edge,” Hofstra said. Still, he noted that Tea Party dissatisfaction with McConnell wasn’t winning Grimes their votes. “I haven’t talked to anybody who would vote her.”

Andrew Schachtner, president of the Louisville Tea Party and a former Bevin campaign staffer, sounded somewhat more restrained than Hofstra in his comments to The Daily Beast. He said his group “was focusing on state and local issues” instead of the Senate race. In particular, he said, the Louisville Tea Party was prioritizing a local state house candidate to help Republicans gain control of the Kentucky House of Representatives. As for the McConnell-Grimes race, Schachtner said he had decided whom he would vote for but declined to disclose that candidate’s identity.

It’s not just Grimes who stands to benefit from Tea Party doubts about McConnell. Patterson, a policeman from the central Kentucky town of Harrodsburg, is seeking to get on the ballot as the Libertarian candidate. A recent poll put Patterson at 7 percent in the race and poised to be a spoiler. In an interview with The Daily Beast, Patterson said he felt confident that his team would get the necessary signatures and noted that he was already preparing in advance for any legal challenge.

Although McConnell has had a slight edge over Grimes in recent polls, most political observers consider the race a tossup, and it looks likely to be tight through Election Day.

But Patterson said that at the moment he is not directly appealing to disaffected Tea Partiers. While he said his campaign “will definitely appeal to those…who are absolutely fed up with the way McConnell has been voting in D.C.,” the Libertarian was aiming to attract those voters who feel “disenfranchised” by the two-party system. While he took pains to say he wasn’t “modeling his campaign after anybody,” he mentioned Gary Johnson’s presidential campaign as a possible inspiration: “more fiscally conservative than the Republicans and more socially accepting than the Democrats.”

Yet despite lingering anger over the primary and the potential appeal of Patterson, some Tea Partiers are rallying around McConnell. Frank Simon of the Tea Party of Kentucky said he is “very much for McConnell over Grimes…Politics is always the lesser of two evils. McConnell is always much better than Grimes. Grimes is pro-abortion.” But Simon said he couldn’t “speak for all the Tea Parties.” Instead, his group’s approach is to try “to make friends with people, because that’s the only way we’re going to survive,” he said. “We’re trying to overlook problems that we had before and trying to pull together to survive November.”

Simon said the bulk of his group’s efforts would involve a voter guide that was put out “not under this organization” but through a political action committee and another organization, which would go out to about 30,000 people. He told The Daily Beast that “unless something unforeseen happens, it will endorse McConnell over Grimes.” The bulk of the voter guides will go out through churches, which is allowed, he said, because it “also gives the pro-abortion endorsements, pro-homosexual endorsements, pro-labor endorsements.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last
No more voting for RINOs ever, under any circumstances. Period.

In the past I voted for McCain, and Romney nationally, and for Scott Brown in Massachusetts. But I guess it depends on your belief in how far gone this nation is, and what it will take to restore it, assuming that is even possible at this point.

Personally, I now believe that the only way to save this nation now (assuming such a thing is still possible) is to put conservatives in political offices and enact an agenda based on free markets, limited government and the rule of law. As long as we have a Republican party that actively opposes those ends (and we do, obviously), then I believe our only (slim) hope is drastic action.

As long as the Republican Party establishment believes that it can continue to survive by being Democrat-lite, and that it can continue to maintain power while actively fighting against the core principles of liberty, free markets and Constitutional law, it will never make the necessary change of direction.

Only when the Republican party understands that it must change or die can we hope to turn this country around. Our too-long-serving entrenched establishment politicians can still enjoy their comfy lifestyles, their wealth, power and prestige as members of a minority party. So why should they bother to change direction?

Surely a John Boehner (or an Eric Cantor -- had he not been defeated -- or a Mitch McConnell) would be just as happy to be minority leaders if the election cycle didn't go their way. Yes, they would prefer to be majority leaders, but what good would it be to them if a conservative Republican Party won the majority and then threw them out of their cushy positions and all those perks, replacing them with real conservatives?

Ask yourself -- which do you think Mitch McConnell would prefer -- a majority Republican party in which he was stripped of his position by a conservative majority, or a minority Republican party in which he could remain Senate minority leader because the majority of Republican senators were RINOs?

You may argue that we have no time to wait for the Republicans to realize that their only choice is to change or die as a viable party. But if we don't have time for that, then what makes you think we have time to wait for the RINOs and the GOP-e to pursue a "moderately marginal" course of action designed only to maintain their personal fiefdoms at the expense of a free America operating under the rule of Constitutional law?

The GOP had majority power in the House and Senate, and occupied the White House, 10 years ago. What did all that power do to move the agenda of liberty forward? Answer: nothing.

A GOP that cannot even sell liberty, limited governments and free markets to the American people is worse than useless. It is a party of tyranny enablers, and I will have none of it.

Unbelievably, today we are facing once again the stark choice between liberty and death.

Once again, these are the times that try men's souls. Conservatives need to be waging aggressive war against the totalitarian leftist tyrants on all fronts -- in the branches of government at the federal and state level, in academia, in the media, through public demonstrations, and in the voting booth.

Many argue that we must continued to vote for "the most electable conservative," which means "vote for the RINO if no conservative is running." But I respectfully disagree with that choice. I am done enabling.

If we really are to lose the greatest country in the history of the world, then let's at least be fighting for it when it goes down.

And who knows, maybe -- just maybe, if we show sufficient resolve and conviction -- divine Providence will once again provide the support that gave our founders their unlikely victory in 1776, and grant us once again the "new birth of freedom" that Lincoln called for a century later.

1 posted on 08/04/2014 5:54:42 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Maceman

I would like to see McConnell kicked to the curb, just like Eric Cantor.


2 posted on 08/04/2014 5:57:58 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
If you want to make an omelet you have to crack a few eggs.

The GOP-wing of the Democrat Party has to be made to understand that they are no longer in charge.

3 posted on 08/04/2014 5:59:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

I hope that Grimes cleans Mitch’s clock for what he has done...


4 posted on 08/04/2014 6:03:34 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Truth be told, the EXEMPT McConnell COULD on any day
have turned it around going against the Tyrant.

But he never did.

The EXEMPT McConnell went after ... conservatives.


5 posted on 08/04/2014 6:03:54 AM PDT by Diogenesis (The EXEMPT Congress is complicit in the absence of impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

A Republicrat


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR Or Lose It

6 posted on 08/04/2014 6:05:23 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

I am honestly surprised McConnell hasn’t made some effort to mend bridges with the base. I think the GOP is testing the waters this cycle to see if they can get enough votes with independents, and nose holding conservatives to disown their base.


7 posted on 08/04/2014 6:16:36 AM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Will Tea Partiers Sink Mitch McConnell’s Kentucky Senate Reelection Bid?


I’m one of ‘em here in central KY.

Man, I hope we do.


8 posted on 08/04/2014 6:21:28 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If you want to make an omelet you have to crack a few eggs.
The GOP-wing of the Democrat Party has to be made to understand that they are no longer in charge.


Exactly my take. It does us absolutely no good to give the current GOP the senate. The higher priority is cleaning out the RINOs. Especially those with over 20 years in the senate.


9 posted on 08/04/2014 6:22:52 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

“Will Tea Partiers Sink Mitch McConnell’s Kentucky Senate Reelection Bid?”

As usual, when a bad guy (McConnell) gets pointed out, and good guys (Tea Party) does something about it, the good guys are suddenly painted as the bad people.


10 posted on 08/04/2014 6:30:07 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

uhmm... maybe the article should be if independent and democrates who voted for him in primaries are going to sink him. There are many more such fraud voters who turn coat on him than conservatives.

this is unreal the schizophrenia.


11 posted on 08/04/2014 6:32:51 AM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist
I am honestly surprised McConnell hasn’t made some effort to mend bridges with the base.

Aaahhh, Arrogance and stupidity in one package, how efficient!

Ambassador Londo Mollari, 2263

12 posted on 08/04/2014 6:34:21 AM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

GOPe encouraged party-line-crossing in Missouri.

I recommend conservatives return the favor and vote Democrat against McConnel.

Until the GOPe loses because of conservatism, they will not listen.


13 posted on 08/04/2014 6:41:30 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The GOP-e scum enlisted Democrats to steal the Republican primary. The GOP-e can go to Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

The sit at home “conservative purists” gave us 4 more years of nobama in 2012 and now you want to do the same and guarantee the dems keep the Senate?

This purist stance is going to end up killing instead of curing America.

Where were you during the Kentucky Primary? Did you stongly support Bevins with your time and money? Obviously not near enough did.


14 posted on 08/04/2014 6:43:35 AM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

While dumping Mitch might be emotionally gratifying, doesn’t look like its going to happen based on the polls I’ve seen...

Mitch has taken the lead in polling and widening it.

Article reads more like wishful thinking than reality at this point.

No doubt he’s angered part of his base, but the idea the libertarian candidate is going to play spoiler for sour grapism isn’t currently being played out. We’ll see in November.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/07/28/mcconnell-leads-grimes-in-bluegrass-poll/13298343/


15 posted on 08/04/2014 6:44:07 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Let's get the facts straight, shall we?

The Tea Party won't be responsible for Mitch McConnell losing.

Mitch McConnell himself will be responsible for his loss (should that happen.)

Fact is, Mitch McConnell's "go along to get along" with Dirty Harry Reid over the last 10 years or so will be his undoing.

16 posted on 08/04/2014 6:46:30 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

Bevin was another not ready for prime time player that the Tea Party put up and got crushed... Don’t have to like McConnell, but if you expect to take him down you have to do better than Bevin.

Internet ads mocking him for looking like a turtle might make the converted excited, but are going to turn off most from even listening to you.

That was probably the absolutely dumbest thing I had seen in a long time.. if his campaign wasn’t over before that ad, it was guaranteed done after.


17 posted on 08/04/2014 6:47:50 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Maceman; All
"Yeah..Mitch, You made your bed (sleepin' w/ 0'Mullah / 0'Reid) in the Senate, Now sleep there"

18 posted on 08/04/2014 6:48:49 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Mullah / "Rustler" 0'Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

I agree, if he goes down it will be by his own hand, but the odds of him going down in November, are to me wishful thinking and sour grapes.

Time will tell, but based on the fact he’s actually improving in every poll that’s come out so far, its hard to imagine he’s going to be sent packing.


19 posted on 08/04/2014 6:49:05 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

McConnell declared war on the TEA Party by saying his goal was to “crush” it. Now he wants pity and votes from conservatives. He’s the Hamas of the GOP.


20 posted on 08/04/2014 6:49:45 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Will Tea PartiersMitch McConnell Sink Mitch McConnell’s Kentucky Senate Reelection Bid?
21 posted on 08/04/2014 6:55:03 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back The Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

McConnell has got to go. Period.

It’s unfortunate that he wasn’t kicked out already 6 years ago, then we’d probably have a real viable candidate against Grimes.


22 posted on 08/04/2014 6:58:02 AM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Exactly! The time for this fight was in the Primary.

These “self proclaimed” Tea Party orgs are proving they pick the wrong people and then don’t have the strength to back them sufficiently. They don’t have us grassroots Tea Party voter’s backing because many are wildeyed libertarian anarchist types who are “self appointed Tea Party leaders” who none of us grassroots folks asked for nor approved of.


23 posted on 08/04/2014 7:00:27 AM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Will you be voting for Grimes? Or neither?


24 posted on 08/04/2014 7:04:58 AM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

The Supreme Court. The Supreme Court. The Supreme Court. This is our Supreme Court:

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 81
Antonin Scalia, 78
Anthony Kennedy, 78
Stephen Breyer, 75
Clarence Thomas, 66
Samuel Alito, 64
Sonia Sotomayor, 60
John Roberts, 59
Elena Kagan, 54

Ginsburg is not retiring this year, but she could retire next year and a Senate Controlled by Democrats could confirm a liberal justice who would hold a place for 30 more years. If Scalia or Kennedy pass away in Obama’s last two years, the Court could have a liberal majority for the next 25 years.

Are we supposed to wait until 2040 for the great conservative take-over? Anything that may leave control of the Senate in the hands of Democrats is absolutely asinine. Conservatives can’t win by losing. Conservatives need to win elections. And, a weak Republican who will caucus with conservatives is always going to be better than a liberal majority in the Senate.


25 posted on 08/04/2014 7:05:54 AM PDT by Kaisersrsic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf; All
Am seriously considering voting straight GOP down
-ticket (locals) and "writing-in" Matt Bevin
after more than 40 years of voting GOP; we Conservatives fought the Marxists for
love of country, It has come to this, the GOP/E selling US(A) out to the Marxists.

Yeah...Mitch, we've seen your Dirty Tricks in KY.
& MS. & your GOP/E pro-Marxist leanings.

26 posted on 08/04/2014 7:11:16 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Mullah / "Rustler" 0'Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SpeakerToAnimals

Ahhhhh, a fan of BAB5! d:^)


27 posted on 08/04/2014 7:12:37 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Mullah / "Rustler" 0'Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

I watched the movie this line is from just the other night. They do not make TV shows as they once did.


28 posted on 08/04/2014 7:16:25 AM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

Will you be voting for Grimes? Or neither?


My goal is not to protest. My goal is to get McConnel out. It means voting, and it means voting for the candidate most likely to defeat him.


29 posted on 08/04/2014 7:19:10 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
While I'm no fan of McConnell, I would much prefer him to Bill Clinton's bubble headed bimbo Lutefisk-Grimey or whatever her name is. She is the democrats newest “Abortion Barbie v2.0” now that Wendy Davis has gone down in flames and deserves to lose if for no other reason to finally put to rest the democrats strategy to run young, attractive but radical leftist women in red states so that any criticism or campaigning against them is met with screams of “Sexist!” and “Women Hater!”
30 posted on 08/04/2014 7:20:14 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt; All
Where were you during the Kentucky Primary?
Did you strongly support Bevin with your time and money?
Obviously not near enough did.
some of US in KY, (like me) gave >200$ to his campaign...
it seems he concentrated all his efforts to L'ville area.
It wasn't until the last 6 wks. (seemly) his tried
to spread into the rest of the state.

31 posted on 08/04/2014 7:22:51 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Mullah / "Rustler" 0'Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

You touch on an important point: the old saying that if you’re going to take a shot at the king, be sure to kill him.

Given the poll numbers, and McConnell’s past track record at defeating challengers, it’s looking like he’s going to win. By a comfortable margin too, if the trending persists.

The result will be a GOP leader, possibly a Senate Majority leader, who won in spite of Conservatives. Not because of them. That’s not a good position to be in, effectively locking the Tea Party out from having any influence, at all, at least through the next cycle and possibly beyond.

Remember what Alinsky said about political action: pick a target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it. Then look at what Mark Levin said about picking one GOP Senate race each cycle and targeting the incumbent for removal.

IMHO for 2014 that race should be Mississippi. It’s a much more egregious situation, and therefore much more ripe for using to send a message.


32 posted on 08/04/2014 7:23:16 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: apillar
While I'm no fan of McConnell, I would much prefer him to Bill Clinton's bubble headed bimbo Lutefisk-Grimey or whatever her name is. She is the democrats newest “Abortion Barbie v2.0” now that Wendy Davis has gone down in flames and deserves to lose if for no other reason to finally put to rest the democrats strategy to run young, attractive but radical leftist women in red states so that any criticism or campaigning against them is met with screams of “Sexist!” and “Women Hater!”

With all due respect, and I mean that, I think there is a bigger picture.

If you reward bad behavior, you get more of it. The RINOs have managed to own the Republican party because they know that conservatives have nowhere else to go.

Your approach is playing right into that strategy. The RINOs have become so certain of your vote that they actually believe they can continued to stay in power by declaring outright war on the conservative base.

And when they do that, they are actually declaring war on America -- war on liberty, war on free market economics, and even war on the Constitution.

The RINO Republicans cannot even make an appeal to the traditional American love of those principles, because they have lost the credibility and historical awareness to articulate them, let alone promote them.

Yes, having Harry Reid continue as speaker is a horrific scenario. But having RINO Republicans win that office is only a marginally better short-term outcome.

And in some ways it is even worse, because as they reach across the aisle" to promote Democrat policies, they give the Democrats cover from the well-deserved blame that they have unleashed on our country for the last five years.

America is out of time now. We cannot continue on the current path. And as things continue to deteriorate, who do you think the voters will blame if the Republicans are in power when the 2016 elections come around?

You think Mitch McConnell's senate will repeal Obamacare? You think it will take the right position on immigration?

America needs clear, passionate and articulate voices to advocate and defend our founding principles, to secure our borders, to preserve our nation, and to take legislative and administrative steps to turn this country around, assuming it still can be turned around.

Majority leader Mitch McConnell will NEVER provide that voice or leadership. He is not the guy to turn things around for our formerly blessed nation.

But in 2016 a newly terrified Republican will be forced to court instead of alienate the conservative base, and come 2017 will be in a position to put the party and our nation on the proper path. Such a duly chastised party has a real chance of nominating a Ted Cruz, instead of a Mitt Romney who, according to last night's panel on Fox News, is at this point the likely Republican presidential nominee.

So in November, I urge those who vote in Kentucky to stay home on election day, or vote libertarian -- anything to prove the RINOs wrong in thinking that they can stay in power by literally declaring war on conservatism.

Think about it.

33 posted on 08/04/2014 7:24:34 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: usconservative; All
Fact is, Mitch McConnell's "go along to get along" with
Dirty Harry Reid over the last 10 years or so will be his undoing.
pretty much, He made his Bed...

34 posted on 08/04/2014 7:25:24 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Mullah / "Rustler" 0'Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: apillar

What the Dems are doing is playing to a lot of crass stereotypes on what motivates Conservatives to vote.

Witness the picture of Grimes aiming that scoped hunting rifle while wearing a tight white tank top and jeans. Definitely playing up the SILF factor.

Then this weekend you have a Grimes surrogate who started taunting McConnell for having an Asian wife. Sure the surrogate backpeddled under mass Democrat condemnations, but that only served to get the taunting more coverage and traction in the press ...


35 posted on 08/04/2014 7:42:58 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Maceman; All
Think about it.
unlike the 'rats, thinkin' is req'd..
many of US(A) voted for "the *itch" in '86, we thought he was a Conservative, we
were wrong..he caught "Potomac fever, let's just forget the voters/US Constitution/BoR"
A Constitutional remedy is Req'd. (2 Term Limit w/ Recall)
"soiled diapers must be changed..so must the Senate"

36 posted on 08/04/2014 7:47:34 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...0'Mullah / "Rustler" 0'Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
"If you reward bad behavior, you get more of it.

What would you call running an ad accusing McConnell and the republicans of taking $750 billion out of medicare? Or one accusing Mitch and the republicans as being responsible for the loss of coal jobs? How about belonging to a party that denigrates him because he married an Asian? Or maybe you prefer a candidate that 100% supports obamacare and abortion on demand. I detest McConnell, but next to Alison, he looks like a saint. We had our chance to replace him in the primary and failed. Trading him for a younger, more radical Harry Reid won't solve anything.

37 posted on 08/04/2014 7:56:11 AM PDT by anoldafvet (Close the border!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
I despise McConnell.

But Conservatives MUST get behind him. Alison Grimes would be an absolute national disaster.

38 posted on 08/04/2014 8:08:16 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Also...McConnell sucks. But was Matt Bevin so much better? He is pro-amnesty, and that is my #1 issue, bar none. Bevin would have been a sure vote for a Gang of 8 style bill.

Chris McDaniel...different story. He is worth fighting for, and defeating Thad Cochran over.

39 posted on 08/04/2014 8:10:37 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

It’s pretty obvious that once elected, she would hold that seat forever, like a Patty Murray or Barb Miskulski.


40 posted on 08/04/2014 8:12:14 AM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The GOP-wing of the Democrat Party has to be made to understand that they are no longer in charge.

Exactly right.

41 posted on 08/04/2014 8:50:21 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

"Is freedom anything else than the right to live as we wish?
Nothing else."

~Epictetus




God bless this site, this Free Republic.
Please click the pic


42 posted on 08/04/2014 8:50:43 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
.


The Tea Party needs to make an "example" of Mitch McConnell ...

just like when Gen. Patton made an "example" of the Nazis in Germany.

Politically speaking, of course ...


.
43 posted on 08/04/2014 8:50:45 AM PDT by Patton@Bastogne (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist
I am honestly surprised McConnell hasn’t made some effort to mend bridges with the base. I think the GOP is testing the waters this cycle to see if they can get enough votes with independents, and nose holding conservatives to disown their base.

There is no mending. McConnell funded those ads in Mississippi accusing the Tea Party of racism. There is no forgiveness. He needs to go.


44 posted on 08/04/2014 8:52:46 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Be prepared, the GOPe apologists are out in full force today. I think Reince promised extra bonus checks this weekend.


45 posted on 08/04/2014 8:53:21 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Maceman,

With all due respect, if a person joins the forces of “evil” to help that “evil” defeat the forces of the “insufficiently perfect”, then that person is really NOT promoting “perfection”.

That person is promoting “evil”.

Such people are called “useful idiots” precisely because they do NOT promote the virtue or perfection they imagine. Their actions promote “evil”, just as much as if they were, in fact, well-paid Obama-campaign-funded trolls.

It seems that you are willing to help Obama appoint Eric Holder as our next Supreme Court Justice.

IMHO, you need to ask yourself what “message” THAT tragic defeat for America would convey to patriots — and to the world.


46 posted on 08/04/2014 8:53:49 AM PDT by pfony1 (Add just 6 GOP Senators and we "bury" Harry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt
This purist stance is going to end up killing instead of curing America.

Because we are doing So Well with Republican-Democrats. So which one of Obama's Judicial nominees did McConnell NOT vote for?

47 posted on 08/04/2014 8:55:09 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

“As usual, when a bad guy (McConnell) gets pointed out, and good guys (Tea Party) does something about it, the good guys are suddenly painted as the bad people.”

Take candy from babies and they cry. Sometimes a parent has to do that, or the baby gets sick.

That’s what parenting (leadership) is all about.


48 posted on 08/04/2014 8:55:32 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
No doubt he’s angered part of his base, but the idea the libertarian candidate is going to play spoiler for sour grapism isn’t currently being played out. We’ll see in November.

You think this is sour grapes? Is that what you call it when a member of your own party deliberately targets you as a racist?

This is way beyond sour grapes, this is a deadly threat to our existence.

49 posted on 08/04/2014 8:58:29 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Bevin was another not ready for prime time player that the Tea Party put up and got crushed... Don’t have to like McConnell, but if you expect to take him down you have to do better than Bevin.

It's not about Bevin, it's about McDaniel, and what Mitch McConnell paid for in Mississippi. He put a dagger in our back, and probably cost us that Senate seat as well.


50 posted on 08/04/2014 9:02:06 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson