Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recapturing a Revolution
Accuracy in Academia ^ | August 4, 2014 | Malcolm A. Kline

Posted on 08/04/2014 11:10:24 AM PDT by Academiadotorg

It’s hard to find a history of the American Revolution from academia that actually tries to recapture it rather than engage in a deconstruction project. Fortunately, the Liberty Fund has re-issued a classic that tries to reconstruct America’s founding, and largely succeeds.

“That the American Revolution and the American people—of all the world’s peoples the most materialistic and most vulgar and least disciplined—should have produced a governmental system adequate to check the very forces they unleashed; this was the miracle of the age, and of the succeeding age, and of all ages to come,” Forrest McDonald wrote in E Pluribus Unum: The Formation of The American Republic 1776-1790. “The French, the Russians, the Italians, the Germans, all the planet’s peoples in their turn, would become so unrestrained as to lost contact with sanity.”

“The Americans might have suffered a similar history, had they followed the lead of those who, in 1787 and 1788, spoke in the name of the people and of popular ‘rights,’” McDonald concluded. “But there were giants in the earth in those days, and they spoke in the name of the nation, and the people followed them. As a result, the Americans were, despite themselves, doomed forever to be free.”

McDonald is a distinguished University Research Professor Emeritus at the University of Alabama. We should note that he nonetheless avoids hagiography in his account, offering vivid portraits of those “giants” that, nonetheless, note their quirks:

“In an age I which most Americans stood about five feet five and measured nearly three-fourths of that around the waist, Washington stood six feet and had broad, powerful shoulders and slim hips; and he had learned the trick, when men said something beyond his ken, of looking at them in a way that made them feel irreverent or even stupid.”

“Madison, at thirty-seven (or any other age), was Washington’s opposite. Few men looked less like a leader: owned a physical presence as uncommanding as one was likely to meet. But his knowledge of what to do in a convention was vast, and his talents for doing it matched his knowledge.”

McDonald’s character sketches of lesser known delegates to the Constitutional convention are, if anything, even more colorful:

“Attorney General William Patterson was so short that even Madison could see the top of his head without standing on tiptoe, but what he had inside made him a tall man at any gathering.”

“Alexander Martin, a former governor of North Carolina, had lived in luxurious isolation on his back-country plantation for so long that (it was rumored) he (a) had abandoned any nationalist sentiments he had ever held; (b) had taken to writing poetry; and (c) had begun doing things with this slaves that made even rednecks blush. (The first two rumors were warranted; the third was never documented.)”

McDonald’s masterful volume is exhaustively sourced, yet never reads like the original source material. “As it happened, Nature had been as generous in the South as she was parsimonious in New England,” McDonald wrote. “Accordingly, to a Southerner the evidence said that God was a decent, easygoing chap; to the Yankee, is said that God was a harsh, vindictive old man who was always putting people on trial.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: constitution; georgewashington; jamesmadison

1 posted on 08/04/2014 11:10:24 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg
McDonald's E Pluribus Unum is a delightful read.

IIRC, he and Gordon Wood were among the young Turks who blasted the dirtbag Beard's An Economic Interpretation . . . out of the water.

2 posted on 08/04/2014 12:11:22 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

what a trio


3 posted on 08/04/2014 12:16:06 PM PDT by Academiadotorg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

I remember the series written by Allan W. Eckert, each loaded with all the footnotes, printed documents, and personal letters, which left little ‘to flesh out a story’.

The series started the story just before The French and Indian War, and ended not too long after the War of 1812.

It’s hard to denounce actual letters, written by lesser known historical characters, because academia attempts to denounce, in the truest of the Communist style, any leader that precedes the current denouncer.


4 posted on 08/04/2014 12:37:47 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith

and, going with that, academics rarely use primary sources. McDonald used the sources you refer to as well as Census data and congressional debates.


5 posted on 08/04/2014 12:47:38 PM PDT by Academiadotorg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson