Posted on 09/16/2014 11:15:57 AM PDT by Mount Athos
Tyson doesn’t believe in God anyway, so why should he really care. Just another liberal Bush basher...
OBTW Tyson, I tried to watch Cosmos, but your condescending tone and orgasmic spewing of evolution caused me to turn the channel and delete the series from my DVR. You sir are a douche and a pinhead.
I had to Google him; didn’t know who he is ...
And that is why I did not watch Cosmos with host Tyson. I bet even his name is fake.
The Muslims worship a moon god, not the God Who made the heavens, the earth, the moon, and the rest of the universe.
Tyson's attempts to pretend he's a moderate by claiming GMOs are safe is also annoying. He spends little time attacking the liberals' claims, but spends much of Cosmos advocating the global warming religion, Darwinism, and the lie that Giordano Bruno was unjustly persecuted. He is one of the most dangerous liberals alive today, as he is good at getting the normally apolitical and apathetic to believe in absolute claptrap which furthers the liberal agenda.
“Allah of the Muslims is the same God as the God of the Old Testament. So, but let’s hold that aside. He says, “Our God is the God” — he’s loosely quoting Genesis, biblical Genesis — “Our God is the God who named the stars.” -—
My Bible says that the LORD God who created the heavens and the earth and everything in them is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. He’s the same God who sent His Son into the world to deliver people from sin.
So many lies...tells me his father is the father of lies—the devil himself.
After devoting a quarter of his first episode to Christian bashing, I didn't watch another.
Tried to watch Cosmos.... I usually like these science and space shows but that was way too boring.
That is such a funny graphic. I’m sure he never said that, but so what. He likes making up quotes by other people.
“I had to Google him; didn’t know who he is ...”
Think Barry Obama, circa 2004.
This guy is a Harvard and Columbia type, who has been thrust into increasingly important roles, quite frankly because he is a minority. And, he has broken into popular culture with appearances on late night talk shows, etc....and now he has his own show.
The libs view him with great reverence - after all, he believes in evolution, global warming, etc...and since as a black man (actually half black making him even more like Barry) who has succeeded in a white dominated scientific world, he must be the smartest guy on the planet. He cannot be questioned - it would be ignorant and racist.
His credentials? Harvard and Columbia - again just like Barry. Harry Reid might even call him magic.
Anyway, for the foreseeable future, he will be put up as the ‘smart guy’ to dismiss all the racist redneck hicks in flyover country who don’t toe the line on global warming, etc.
Tyson Tyson and Dyson
The wholey three of blabberhood.
Tyson gets a pass because he is one of the few scientists foolish enough to agree with the “New Atheists” on the fallacy that science disproves God. So of course, the atheists think he must be a rare genius for agreeing with them, rather than the common dunce that he really is.
Lmao, did he actually say that, or is that just a clever parody?
What??? Show me where he said that because it beyond stupid ...its mathematically impossible.. so ever if i don’t like the guy i would have think he just misspoke
More atoms in the galaxy than atoms in the universe? Nothwithstanding the fact that each star is composed of more atome than there are stars in the universe. Perhaps that is what he meant to say.
Where is the Smoking Hot Spot?
No smoking hot spot1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.
Each possible cause of global warming has a different pattern of where in the planet the warming occurs first and the most. The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmosphere for decades using radiosondes: weather balloons with thermometers that radio back the temperature as the balloon ascends through the atmosphere. They show no hot spot. Whatsoever.
If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming. If we had found the greenhouse signature then I would be an alarmist again.
More stars than atoms??? Please tell me he didn’t really say that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.