Posted on 09/24/2014 3:02:46 PM PDT by markomalley
True enough :)
Islam does teach peace. It is just that their definition is different from ours. Opposite in fact.
You got to the real truth of the question of whether Islam is a religion of peace or not.
If the Moslems didn’t have Jews/Israelis, Christians, and other religious minorities to target for extermination or dhimmitude, they’d be AND ARE killing each other over which Islamic movement (i.e. Wahaddi, Shiite, Sunni, Sufi, etc). is the TRUE ISLAM.
SO if Islam is “a religion of peace”, then why is this internecine slaughter taking place within the Islamic world.
I know that the jihadist coveruppers like CAIR, MSA, ICNA, etc. will say that only one group is the TRUE Islam practitioner, while all the others are malformed versions or even blasphermers.
Obama is a political/ideological Marxist, but a covert Islamist in religious and spiritual thought.
Instead of the old “Watermelon” ideologues, “Green on the outside, Red on the Inside”, Obama is a “Mildewed Watermelon”, “Black mildew for Islam on top of the Green of the environmental wacko leftists, covering up his deeply held RED Marxist core”.
If there is any doubt about my contention, reread this new UN speech and see who the villains of the world are today, starting with the US in Ferguson, MO. No criticism of Iran, No. Korea, Russia, Red China, the Wahhabists, Moslem Brotherhood, Islamic jihadists (who killed an innocent French citizen in Algeria today).
Obama is NOT “an enigma wrapped in a mystery”. He is a communist wrapped in a burqua with flowers in his hair.
I like it!
Of course, Barry, you're right again. For example, the States of "Al-Aska" and "Al-Abama" were originally founded by 12th Century Islamic colonists.
It’s Time to Take the Islamic State Seriously (Excellent Analysis!)
Crisis Magazine ^ | September 23, 2014 | REV. JAMES V. SCHALL, S.J.
Islam has no central or definitive body or figure authorized to define what exactly it is. Opinions about its essence and scope vary widely according to the political or philosophic background of its own interpreters. The current effort to establish an Islamic State, with a designated Caliph, again to take up the mission assigned to Islam, brings to our attention the question: “What is Islam?”
The issue of “terror” is a further aspect of this same understanding. Many outside Islam seek to separate “terror” and “Islam” as if they were, in their usage, independent or even opposed ideas. This latter view is almost impossible seriously to maintain in the light of Islamic history and the text of the Qur’an itself.
John Kerry, however, insists that what we see is “terrorism” with nothing to do with Islam. The Obama administration seems to have a rule never to identify Islam with “terrorism,” no matter what the evidence or what representatives of the Islamic State themselves say.
Ecumenism and liberalism both, in their differing ways, because of their commitment to tolerance and free speech, make it difficult to deal with what is happening in Islamic states. Islam is not friendly to relativism or to subtle distinctions.
Is terror intrinsic to Islam?
Yet, we can ask: is this Islamic State anything more than a pipe-dream? No Islamic state has any serious possibility of defeating modern armies. But, ironically, they no longer think that modern armies will be necessary. They are convinced that widespread use of terrorism and other means of civil disorder can be successful. No one really has the will or the means to control the destructive forces that the Islamic State already has in place.
Finally, the case of the Islamic State and of the jihadists is not just a threat arising out of Islam’s mission to conquer the world for Allah. It is also a moral case, that the life of the West is atheist and decadent. It does not deserve its prosperity and position. The mission of mankind is the submission to Allah in all things.
It is easy to write this movement off as fanatical and ruthless, which it is. To the outside world, it sounds horrific, but I suspect not to those who believe its truth and see the current revival of Islam with relief. The second or third class ranking of Islam in the modern world is over. But to the degree that we misjudge what is motivating the renewal of Islam, we will never understand why it exists as it does.
Full truth about Islam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3207048/posts
MESSAGE TO OBAMA ABOUT ISIS
Some of you may be familiar with the history of the beginning of Islam. If you can, please check in the Koran the references provided by Rashid.
Brother Rashid in a message to Obama about ISIS (in English).
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=698996990181639
Utter, moronic, easily refuted CRAP!
srbfl
I know and understand that blood pressure rises about all of this, but try to always remember that God is still on the throne and all of these clowns are going down, big time.
When he repeated that we will never be at war with Islam that was the signal to the Muzzie world that he had their collective 6. Not to worry. I might have to drop a few bombs but there will not be serious intentions. Stay cool, stay calm try not to be too much “In our face”.
Entirely apt description. I'd take it further, but as you point out, we need to have some decorum. Might put dumb, criminal, inept, and narcissistic in front just to clarify.
If you condemn Obama, you condemn Islam...
Every time the 0yutz runs his mouth something bad happens.
Absolutely they are and they have a plan for peace.
It comes after everyone who is not a muslim is dead.
They have also stated they are willing to wait a thousand years to complete the task.
Islam is to peace as a dog turd is to a fine cigar.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.