Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Pilots Say New Chinese Stealth Fighter Could Become Equal of F-22, F-35
USNI News ^ | November 5, 2014 | Dave Majumdar

Posted on 11/05/2014 11:10:21 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

China’s new Shenyang J-31 stealth fighter — making its debut next week at the Zhuhai international airshow — could eventually become more than a match for American stealth fighters in battle, several U.S. military and industry officials told USNI News.

The J-31 is China’s latest crack at developing a modern so-called fifth-generation stealth fighter — equivalent in ability to Lockheed Martin’s F-22 Raptor or F-35 Lighting II Joint Strike Fighter.

“They’re still in the glossy brochure phase of development, so they still look ten feet tall and bulletproof,” one senior U.S. fighter pilot familiar with the F-35 program told USNI News.

“I think they’ll eventually be on par with our fifth gen jets — as they should be, because industrial espionage is alive and well.”

Many suspect the J-31 is designed using technology stolen from the Pentagon’s nearly $400 billion Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program.

“They sure look like F-35 and F-22s don’t they?” one Air Force operational test pilot told USNI News.

The senior U.S. pilot familiar with the F-35 — who has extensive experience flying the Lockheed Martin F-16 Falcon — told USNI News the Chinese jet is now likely more than match for existing fourth generation non stealth American fighters like the Air Force Falcons, Boeing F-15 Eagles and the U.S. Navy’s F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.

“They’ll probably be a handful right off the bat for all of our fourth gen stuff,” the pilot said.

One former Air Force fighter pilot extensive experience with foreign hardware told USNI News potential air battles might be more about sheer number of jets the Chinese might be able to put into the air versus the superior training of U.S. pilots.

“I worry about numbers more than particular platforms,” the former fighter pilot said. “I imagine their jets and their weapons are pretty good. Don’t know about the pilots or their capacity to employ.”

Further, the retired pilot noted, airshows are designed to show off weapons to potential buyers, but offer no real information about what jet can really do during an actual combat mission.

“Just remember that airshows are exactly that — airshows.” the former pilot said. “Airshows provide no real clue to capabilities. As such, airshows generally rely on spectacular maneuvers to garner attention without providing substance. No different from the F-15C or the F-22.”

One current Air Force test pilot told USNI News that it would be difficult to gauge just how good the Chinese jet will be.

“Overall at this stage their not [operational] so it’s hard, for anyone to truly make a reasonable assessment,” the test pilot said.

There are still many unanswered questions about how the Chinese will operate their aircraft and what kinds of weapons the jets will carry. Perhaps the most important question is how good are the Chinese radars and other sensors compared to their American equivalents.

“How well will organic sensors work to support those weapons?” the test pilot asked rhetorically.

For U.S. industry officials, the J-31’s debut at the Zhuhai airshow signals that the Chinese are planning on selling the jet on the open market.

“I would characterize the J-31 flying at the Chinese airshow as ‘incremental and measured,’” a senior industry official told USNI News.

“There have been some reports that the J-31 maybe be exported. If so, then showing it off makes even more sense to attract prospective buyers,” the official said.

The Chinese are making a lot of progress in developing their aerospace industry.

However, jet engines remain a weak spot for China.

“They have yet to field many of their “new” designs in any quantities,” the industry official said. “Time will tell.”

Meanwhile, the Russia’s advanced Sukhoi Su-35 Flanker-E is also making it debut at the Zhuhai airshow.

The Chinese are reportedly interested in the purchase of 24 examples of the modernized Russian-built jet.

There has been much media speculation that the Chinese intend to reverse engineer the aircraft as they have with previous Flanker variants.

“I view the Su-35 buy as a conservative stop-gap measure while they wait for the J-20 and J-31 to enter service,” the industry official said.

“Gotta have aircraft to have an air force.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; china; f22; f35

1 posted on 11/05/2014 11:10:21 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We still excel at pilots


2 posted on 11/05/2014 11:12:53 AM PST by al baby (Hi MomÂ…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Didn’t Clinton provide China with the blueprints?


3 posted on 11/05/2014 11:14:23 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I highly doubt their quality of interchangeable parts...


4 posted on 11/05/2014 11:14:44 AM PST by BBB333 (Q: Which is grammatically correct? Joe Biden IS or Joe Biden ARE an idiot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

stolen technology


5 posted on 11/05/2014 11:14:49 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The fake might look good, but doesn't usually hold up in real world usage.


6 posted on 11/05/2014 11:19:06 AM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

You know what they say about Chinese fighter jets, don’t ya?

Shoot one out of the sky, and an hour later...you’re ready to do it again.


7 posted on 11/05/2014 11:24:10 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It will be a few years.


8 posted on 11/05/2014 11:26:21 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Didn’t Clinton provide China with the blueprints?

Obama gave them all the updates I suppose.

9 posted on 11/05/2014 11:50:15 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Yes, but they have the time. After all, they’re still making them and we’re not.


10 posted on 11/05/2014 11:51:51 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Our huge advantage is in experience and running large operations, which the Chinese to this point are woefully short on. They need a war to test some things out, which may be coming with their neighbors.
11 posted on 11/05/2014 11:57:04 AM PST by aegiscg47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
We've been at it for over a decade and even WE can't build a mission-capable F-35 yet. I'm not concerned about a Chinese copy of an F-35.
12 posted on 11/05/2014 12:03:58 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Yes, but they have the time. After all, they’re still making them and we’re not. Yup, like the WW2 Rooskies. It's about the numbers in the air, not the quality of airplane nor pilot. All they need is 1 to work....
13 posted on 11/05/2014 12:44:13 PM PST by llevrok (I fear the US government more than I do al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

More to the point, their pilots don’t actually *have* to be very good. Air combat mostly isn’t about dogfighting with guns any more, its about who has better missiles, who launches first, and who has more of them.

With that in mind, the Chinese pilots only have to be good enough to be able to close to missile range, get a lock, and ripple fire every missile on or in the airframe. If they have 100 of them and we only have 20, well....


14 posted on 11/05/2014 1:01:44 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

I believe the doctrine is “Quantity has its own Quality”


15 posted on 11/05/2014 1:06:05 PM PST by wrench (While not "airborne" , Ebola is a Spit-Borne virus. Good thing no one sneezes in public)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wrench

Yup.

A good example of how it works is to play some of the more recent military simulators. You can play out such scenarios and at some point no matter how advanced your tech is, sheer numbers cancel them out.


16 posted on 11/05/2014 1:11:21 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

It worked for the Sherman tank in Europe...


17 posted on 11/05/2014 1:19:12 PM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

China should show us more about how weapons are mounted in that aircraft. Then we’ll decide. ;-)


18 posted on 11/05/2014 1:21:23 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

For some values of ‘work’, yes. Tended to be more than a bit hard on the crews, though.


19 posted on 11/05/2014 1:24:52 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

I was referring strictly to ‘quantity vs. quality’, ‘quality’ being the superior armor & firepower of the limited-quantity Panzers.


20 posted on 11/05/2014 4:13:57 PM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson