Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren blasts FDA proposal on gay sex (calls it too restrictive)
Politico ^ | December 23, 2014 | Trevor Eischen

Posted on 12/24/2014 3:43:50 AM PST by Zakeet

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) took to Twitter on Tuesday to criticize the FDA’s proposed new policy on blood donations from gay men, saying that while the recommendation is a “step forward” it is still “discriminatory.”

The liberal legislator and potential 2016 presidential candidate tweeted that the FDA must “have courage to set policies based on science” in order to “commit to building a bigger, safer blood supply through risk-based screenings.”

The policy, introduced Tuesday by FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, would replace a 30-year-old ban on blood donations from gay and bisexual men with a new rule permitting donations from men who haven’t had sex with another man for at least a year.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: aids; blood; cdc; ebola; elizabethwarren; fauxahontas; fda; gayblood; homofascism; hookupculture; lieawatha; massachusetts; publichealth; redcross; warren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Granny squaw with high cheekbones pander to base ... also know-em heap much medicine ... pay-em back bad white man for give-em Indians smallpox ... dose-em white man with heap bad blood ... Chief Spreading Bull teach-em white man heap good lesson.

1 posted on 12/24/2014 3:43:50 AM PST by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
The liberal legislator and potential 2016 presidential candidate tweeted that the FDA must “have courage to set policies based on science”

The science is this, gay men have shorter lifespans, higher rates of drug abuse, and have greater/rising numbers of STDs (including AIDS). A significant portion of their "community" still engages in random sexual hookups with total strangers (in public washrooms, nightclubs, and now with grindr via cellphone app introductions).

2 posted on 12/24/2014 3:50:46 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I will go along with warren on this if she signs a document that when and if her children and grandchildren ever need a blood transfusion in thier life time they will use a gay mans donated blood only! Have we not had enough of these arrogant man beast biotches


3 posted on 12/24/2014 3:51:41 AM PST by ronnie raygun (Empty head empty suit = arrogant little bastard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Well, if blood banks, hospitals, and any place draws one gay mans blood knowingly. Carelessly disregarding all knowledge of how STDS that specifically target 80% homosexual men in our country, and the rest IV drug users. Then I guess if I need a transfusion or die, I die.

All because one lawmaker wants to make it fair that sodomizing idiots want to feel justified in their abomination to all nature, and all humanity.

A prime example of what the atheistic belief leads to. Contradicting everything observable because “I’m right, and I cannot possibly be wrong.”


4 posted on 12/24/2014 3:52:01 AM PST by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
The liberal legislator and potential 2016 presidential candidate tweeted that the FDA must “have courage to set policies based on science”

Science isn't a consideration when policies apply to liberal totems like man-made global warming, or racial preferences, so why start this now?

5 posted on 12/24/2014 3:53:25 AM PST by Sooth2222 ("In a democracy people get the leaders they deserve." - Joseph de Maistre, 1753-1821)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Every FDA and politicians who sign off on this needs to have a special supply of blood if they need it....

Gay men’s blood since they are so damn special....


6 posted on 12/24/2014 3:56:00 AM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

It is, and if this goes through. I propose not one heterosexual normal, not mentally ill person donate their blood. Ever again.

Supply and demand rule capitalism, and not one person in their right mind (even a liberal democrat) will accept a blood transfusion not knowing if it came from a high risk gay man, or a normal human being that do not engage in highly risky sexual acts, and IV drug use.

Soon when people start dying due to a shortage of blood and unwillingness to accept transfusions, gay men will not be allowed to donate blood, and all blood stock will be destroyed.

Waste of time, waste of money, waste of thought, and waste of my energy to even consider. Because I already know what the outcome will be.


7 posted on 12/24/2014 3:58:23 AM PST by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
“have courage to set policies based on science” in order to “commit to building a bigger, safer blood supply through risk-based screenings.”

Isn't that what they are doing with the current gay ban?

As I always say, the left is irony impaired.

8 posted on 12/24/2014 4:15:37 AM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I’ll take non-queer blood for may transfusion, please.


9 posted on 12/24/2014 4:18:55 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I’ve said all along. Let the gays donate, when they leave pour the blood down the drain. No big deal.
The only way we check is through a questionnaire. If they say they aren’t gay we believe them, so you can bet some blood is tainted. And some is intentional.
The couple of major operations I’ve had over the past 10-15 yrs the doctors were very reluctant to transfuse .
Doctors told me I did not require a transfusion.


10 posted on 12/24/2014 4:33:25 AM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Why are gays so eager to give blood, they must rupture hemorrhoids all the time.


11 posted on 12/24/2014 4:35:44 AM PST by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Maybe Granny Squaw get to receive some AIDs nainted queer blood.


12 posted on 12/24/2014 4:57:56 AM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

And the ruling elite will have its own supply of untainted blood. This shows their contempt for normal people.
Warren is insane.


13 posted on 12/24/2014 5:04:30 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

She’s as much of a squaw as I am. Will someone please turn the lights on around this fraud.


14 posted on 12/24/2014 5:09:34 AM PST by ThomasMore (Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

It wouldn’t surprise me if these politicians have a secret “protected” blood supply solely for their own use.


15 posted on 12/24/2014 5:10:45 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

ph


16 posted on 12/24/2014 5:15:44 AM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

She should demonstrate this by being injected with blood from a homosexual man.


17 posted on 12/24/2014 5:18:47 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

It seems to me that homosexuals are already giving blood. They just lie on the questionnaire when filling the form. Do hospitals analyze all blood that is donated? It’s hard to stop queers from donating if they don’t disclose their sexual peccadilloes.


18 posted on 12/24/2014 5:21:21 AM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

“I will go along with warren on this if she signs a document that when and if her children and grandchildren ever need a blood transfusion in thier life time they will use a gay mans donated blood only! Have we not had enough of these arrogant man beast biotches”

But...she’s a professor so she must be really smart. On any subject, too. Just like our current President.


19 posted on 12/24/2014 5:41:55 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Time to set up a new, private blood bank whose donors are carefully screened and whose supply is not open to the general public. Liberals and Atheists don't want conservative or Christian blood, anyhow.
20 posted on 12/24/2014 5:54:11 AM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson