Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libs Already Regret Net Neutrality; Google to Filter Search Results by "Fact"
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | March 2, 2015 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 03/02/2015 12:42:41 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
More in the link
1 posted on 03/02/2015 12:42:41 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why the dig at Netflix, I wonder- I don’t see much perversion on there.

In fact I am about to cancel it because there is rarely anything new I want to watch.


2 posted on 03/02/2015 12:46:37 PM PST by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016 (for 16 years of conservative bliss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Already finished third season of House of Cards (U.S. version)?


3 posted on 03/02/2015 1:00:05 PM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I can see net neutrality doing real damage to online gaming which has plenty of gamers all across the political spectrum.


4 posted on 03/02/2015 1:00:55 PM PST by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Typical liberals. Always slow to catch up with reality. They were warned.

Watching them cheer lead for net neutrality reminds me of when they were cheer leading for obamacare.


5 posted on 03/02/2015 1:09:28 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Fact.

As determined by Snopes, Politifact, and what. Media Matters?


6 posted on 03/02/2015 1:15:09 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Regime is going to regulate content.

No dictator can co-exist with freedom of speech.

7 posted on 03/02/2015 1:16:11 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Try as it can, the FCC’s jurisdiction would only apply to networks and servers and sites hosted within US borders, right? A site hosted in, say, Panama or Japan or India could still thumb its nose at them.

Considering foreign hosting alternatives for FR yet?


8 posted on 03/02/2015 1:20:10 PM PST by coydog (Time to feed the pigs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I have absolutely no use for Netflix. I have tried to sign up several times but could not find movies that interested me and when I finally found one, they didn’t have it in stock. So I gave up


9 posted on 03/02/2015 1:21:19 PM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Do you know who the number one cheerleader for Net Neutrality has been, since his first day in office as a Senator from Minnesota?


10 posted on 03/02/2015 1:22:21 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The only thing worth watching on Netflix is Breaking Bad, and fargo (movie). Even the kids shows suck!


11 posted on 03/02/2015 1:26:34 PM PST by gr8eman (Don't waste your energy trying to understand commies. Use it to defeat them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: coydog

Fully expect accelerated efforts to pass a UN International “Internet Protection” treaty any time now, all in the name of:
1. thwarting terrorism / inciting violence, such as ISIS recruitment, via hate / radical / misinformation site information monitoring and filtering to label and restrict access, to “protect” us.
2. ensure privacy of world citizens to “protect” against improper use of Personal Information data - authorities will need to monitor PII / PHI data to ensure compliance.

3. protect vital infrastructure, such as banking, health, food, energy, government essential services - authorities will overtly need to monitor IP addresses.

Note, the USA ICANN ceded control of the internet
http://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2014/03/15/us-government-cedes-control-of-the-internet/

FCC gets control of the US internet last week.

Now Google is going to work with Microsoft and left orientated “Fact-checking” sites to “protect” US subjects from mis/dis-information.

Things are moving fast to usher in a Global Tyrannical Dem-Socialist reign.
Control information dissemination
Crash the dollar / EU
Reconstitute governments and economies to usher in a “A New World Order” (power & social structure), just as Bush I literally stated, 25 years ago...


12 posted on 03/02/2015 2:08:11 PM PST by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Netfick was the big pusher of this.. they want the streaming video qos without paying for that top tier with out paying for it...it like wanting a private jet at your beck and call but at budget airlines standby rates...

There the 10 ton King Kong at the all you can eat bandwidth buffet eating with the regular people.. you’re just going to get what’s left for scraps


13 posted on 03/02/2015 2:21:31 PM PST by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Information will always find a way if it wants to.

Even with all that, it’s still whack-a-mole.


14 posted on 03/02/2015 3:22:26 PM PST by coydog (Time to feed the pigs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

On CNBC they went around asking people what net neutrality was. Very few even knew it had something to do with the internet. One guy knew. He said that the Democrats wanted to make the internet fair, but the Republicans were bowing to the big internet companies and didn’t want the little guys to have access to the internet by making it cost too much.


15 posted on 03/02/2015 3:22:35 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coydog

“Try as it can, the FCC’s jurisdiction would only apply to networks and servers and sites hosted within US borders, right?”

Wrong, because the foreign servers can be monitored for content and their IP addresses can then be filtered out at the intermediate domestic routers responsible for forwarding the IP packets. The end result would be monitoring and censoring of foreign located servers who are then unable to deliver IP packets to domestic American clients.


16 posted on 03/02/2015 3:38:04 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Then they would be no better than China, and in effect, squander their moral credibility. Whatever ways that system can be gotten around, I’m all for them.


17 posted on 03/02/2015 3:52:22 PM PST by coydog (Time to feed the pigs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: coydog; GeronL
Try as it can, the FCC’s jurisdiction would only apply to networks and servers and sites hosted within US borders, right?

Doesn't Google already censor search results for China and other oppressive nations?

18 posted on 03/02/2015 5:13:35 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Why do you think it will affect gaming?


19 posted on 03/02/2015 6:53:49 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

Gaming takes major bandwidth and the feds are going to drive the costs out of reach for many.


20 posted on 03/02/2015 6:59:04 PM PST by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson