Posted on 03/06/2015 10:01:35 AM PST by Theoria
Sigh.
Some people have no sense of nuance. (Please don’t ask, I’m not interested in explaining it to you.)
Really, I thought the article was guilt by association. In the article it says that the prosecution is basing their fact off of picture from Facebook. Tell me how he was abetting a capitol crime. Lets say I’m at a bar and someone snaps a photo of me, and there you are in the background talking to a random person. Does this mean we’re friends. No. He is being charged with a crime based on a b.s. law. If he is a criminal by all means throw him in prison. But putting our tax dollars into a prison being filled with innocent people is not justified and anyone who thinks it is had better hope the same doesn’t happen to them, because it easily could.
So you’re saying he is not a member of the gang involved in the drive-by shooting? You should contact his attorney and offer to vouch for his character.
I could quote a certain Star Wars princess, but the comparison would be too obvious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.